Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Centrica/CST claimform - Industrial Training Bond


smooth
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 579 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

They had initially chased me for the money and i spoke to centrica directly disagreeing with owing this money and the department in Centrica who deal with money owed advised me to email another department which i did.

 

The email contained my reasoning behind leaving, my justification in doing so and why i don't agree with owing this money. 

I had heard nothing from centrica since that email was sent

 

now 3 years later i'm being harassed by credit style asking repay this money.

I was wondering if anyone else in this thread has heard anything else since receiving these letters as i appear to be a month or 2 behind you lot.

 

They have left me numerous voice mails

however on one of the recent voicemails they said they'll have to pass the debt back to centrica if i don't contact them?

 

I also read that employers can't seek money off an employee through a government funded apprenticeship however i'm not sure how true that holds to this particular case though the apprenticeship at least partly was government funded.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 

 

(i recently done a credit check on my name and i have zero debt on my credit file also)  

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them all

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

they have solved your problem for you.

 

If you don't pay up they will stop harassing you as they dont do that for free so it becomes Centrica's problem again.

 

centrica will have to provide proper accounts as to what is owed and why and they may find this costs more than the debt they are chasing.

 

maintain radio silence for the meanwhile

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi BadMojo, 

 

Have you heard anything since receiving that letter from CST law?

 

I've received mine today (after receiving letters from Credit Style)  and it's for the training bond for leaving British gas i left within the first year so they're stating i owe over £9,000 :( ...

 

The letter states 'Our client' 'possible legal action' and 'new balance if a CCJ is obtained' among other things.

 

Thanks for advice/help regarding this matter 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a std threat-o-gram hoping to find a mug to fleece.

and of course the letter doesn't say will anything.

 

as long as the client (the 'debt' owner) has your correct and current address and you have not moved, very safe to ignore.

 

ther are no examples I can find of any legal action by BG involving these 'courses' .

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello, following up on my old thread and I am in a similar situation to others who have posted recently. 

 

in all honesty I’m very confused about everything and what I have to do

 

i had a claim form sent to me in which it stated I had to respond, I did even though I didn’t fully understand it and had also spoken to CST law who were putting offers across to Centrica to clear the debt if we can come to an agreement. 

 

I have since received another letter called ‘notice of proposed allocation to the fast track’ stating this is now a defended claim

 

my understanding from CST law is that everything is on hold until Centrica reply with a response after the offer we had put across to them I chased CST law multiple times and they kept saying they haven’t responded and to wait

 

now I have this from the court which is time sensitive the questions and what I need to fill in are extremely confusing to someone like my self who isn’t technical in the legal system 

 

I have rang CST law multiple times and each time the legal team are busy and my case handler just isn’t ringing me back

 

from my understanding after ringing the court I have to fill out this form by the 20th December and I am happy to do so but I really have no idea what sections I should fill in and weather I say yes or no to certain questions

 

is anyone else in a similar position to me or can assist me with what I am meant to be doing? That would be greatly appreciated 

 

thanks again 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to another Centrica/CST claimform - Industrial Training Bond .

Good grief.  CST Law are the enemy.  They won't help you.  CAG however will.

 

Please upload the form you have to fill in.

 

And write here what you put in your defence.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to another Centrica/CST claimform Fast Track - Industrial Training Bond . help with N181 please

why have you come here so late after getting the claimform?

 

you now have an N181 , use our search top right for that one

 

but we need all the usual information please!!

 

fill this out :

 

 

 

 

and post up the defence you filled too please

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

Claim form issue date - 28th July 

 

Notice of proposed allocation to the fast track - 18th November 

 

poc

 

1.The claimant's claim is in respect of an overpayment of salary/expenses full particulars of which have been previously supplied

 

2.and the claimant claims 9324.63 GBP, Account No 2151**

 

3374.24 GBP, interest thereon in accordance with Section 69a of the county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8.00% p.a. calculated from the date upon which payment became due to the date hereof as set out below.

Further interest at the rate of 2.04 per day (8.00% p.a.) to judgement of payment.

 

The claimant believes that the facts stated in this claim form are true and I am duly authorised by the claimant to sign this statement 

 

What is the total value of the claim? £13433 
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Training bond due to leaving an apprenticeship before 3 years 
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? They have sent me a virtually signed document with the contract
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Centrica are claimant, CST law are dealing and the court

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I believe so yes
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I have had multiple letters like everyone else who has been on the forum over the years regarding this matter
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? I am unsure, but when I left I had contested the original claim as I was dealing directly with Centrica’s collection team and they never got back to me after the final email I had sent and didn’t hear anything until years down the line
 

Why did you cease payments? N/A
 

What was the date of your last payment? N/A
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Correct I originally contested what was owed back in 2017 and gave my reasons for leaving and I assumed the matter was closed
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

I left a British Gas apprenticeship within the first 12 months of starting and went back to my old career in an office , my reasons for leaving were down to the completely different job role which I realised quickly was not for me and it was impacting my mental health massively. The claim is for a training bond which was in a contract I signed based on a sliding scale Year 1 - £9,000 year 2 £6,000 year 3 £3,000  

 

............................

 

 

Thank you everyone for your quick responses I just wish I posted here in the first place 

 

I probably shouldn't have filled in the claim form however on the letter it said I had limited time to do so and because I was dealing with CST law trying to come to an agreement with paying off the debt I didn't think it would get to this point and now I have probably made my situation worst. Of course, I would have posted here first before sending it off had I not been in communication with CST to set up an agreement. 

 

I sent the letter back to the court as some point in early August, the issue date on the claim form is 28th July and the most recent letter I have received 'Notice of fast track' is dated 18th November 

 

If I am honest I can't fully remember what I wrote word for word in my defence, it would have been along the lines of why I left, my reasons and the fact I returned to my old career in an office plus taking a pay cut to do so. There wasn't much room to write a long winded defence so I kept it relativity short.

 

The above document Andy has posted is the exact document I am now looking at very confused in what exactly I put where 

 

I just want to re-iterate I never agreed with this money I owe due to the training bond but it has gone on for so long at this point I'm happy to set up a payment plan if the balance can get reduced or a small one off payment upfront and this is exactly what I was trying to do prior to receiving the most recent letter 

 

I have had zero communication from CST law, Centrica advised me to deal with them directly and I was waiting for a response from CST with the offer we had put across to Centrica - I chased it multiple times the following weeks and they kept telling me they haven't had a response and when they do we'll contact you which they still have not

 

Ideally I would rather not give them any money however I feel like I am out of options at what I probably should have done years ago is attempt to get it reduced and set up a payment plan 

 

Please let me know if I have missed any critical info out 

 

Thanks again for everyone's help

 

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent the CPR 31.14 we told everyone else to send?

why did you not follow the examples upon defence already here

what date is top right of the claimform please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I did not send CPR 31. 14, or follow up any defences in other threads and the reason why is because I was trying to come to an arrangement with CST law to reduce the bill and get it paid or set up a payment plan in hindsight I should have messaged here first, a big mistake on my part. 

 

Claim form issue date - 28th July 

 

Notice of proposed allocation to the fast track - 18th November 

 

Please let me know if you require any further info I will be at my computer all day and can reply much quicker 

 

Thank you 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you need to complete the DQ and get that filed and served.

 

A. Settlement (I assume you have no desire to offer any settlement so tick no at 1.) 

at 3 state your briefest reason as to why you don't wish to settle and is inappropriate and why you have defended the claim.

 

B. B2  Yes you are litigant and it must be heard in your local county court.

 

C. Not applicable to you the defendant

 

D. D1 No

    D2  N/A

    D3  N/A

    D4  N/A

 

E.  No

 

F. 1 yourself

 

G.  Less than 1 day 3 hours

 

H. N/A

 

I.  No

 

J. The claimants will set the Directions and you can agree or disagree

 

Sign and date the courts copy and provide email contact (not the claimants copy just date)

 

 

 

Andy

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see you were being harassed by Credit Style.  Well CST Law are simply Credit Style.  They're not a real firm of solicitors.  Credit Style admit this on their website.

 

We really need to see what you wrote in your defence.  If you've admitted or partially admitted to owing the money it could be bad news.

 

I see Andy has indicated how to fill the current form in.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow thank you Andy for the above, just a couple Q's before I fill in the bits I am unsure off, first is the below defence okay? 

 

A.3

 

I wish not to settle because I left due to my mental health, I had always worked in an office I had zero experience doing a physical, challenging and technical job in an environment I had never worked in before.

 

It had a huge impact on my life inside and outside of work - I felt the support was never there from management, I was working alone and had no one to support me or talk to.

 

I continued trying to work through it but towards the end, I felt I had no choice but to leave due to the pressures I was putting on myself - I got in contact with my previous employer and was offered my old job back, this is where I still work today, I took a large pay cut going back, hopefully, this proves how bad the situation was I was going through.

 

I explained my reasoning at the time of leaving, I also spoke to Centrica directly regarding the training bond, I was advised to email a specific department which I did, I put my case across and why I am disputing plus my reasons for leaving and that was the last I heard until years later down the line.  

 

B. B2 - ‘yes’ I am unsure what I write in the box below? Do I write ‘I am litigant and it must be heard in my local county court.’ It asks which court also? 

 

C - leave blank? 

 

F - Myself, do I need to state anything in the witness to which facts box next to it? 

 

J - leave blank? 

 

FTM Dave my original defence would have been similar to what I wrote above, I wouldn't have admitted to owing the money. 

 

Also I have the original email I sent to Centrica back in 2017 stating why I left and after I had sent that in I didn't hear anything until years later I will post it below as it may help my case further down the line if you would like to have a look at it - 

 

I have been advised to email in regards with the training bond I’d like to dispute.

My payroll number is ******** & my name is *********
I started my career in British Gas as an apprentice Smart meter Engineer back in July 2016 and made the decision to leave in January 2017.

The reason I left the company was because I realised that this type of work wasn’t for me, British Gas recruited me knowing my previous job history which was all office based and working alongside other colleagues in a team environment. Prior to this I had no previous experience working on my own or doing manual work.

My argument is that during my training and even when I went out on patch with a mentor I was always with someone, so I never really got a taste for what the job would be like, mentally without being around colleagues and working on my own. Not only that whilst I was out with the mentors they would always help you finish the jobs and take some of the work off your hands, either they would want to finish on time or had somewhere they needed to be so even then I never really understood how challenging the work was.

When I finally became qualified and was working on my own it was a massive shock to me how different the actual job was. I never once expected how mentally I would feel not having anyone alongside me to work with and how much more physically challenging the job was especially not having anyone to help me out.

I understand British Gas train you on a lot of things but when it comes to mental & physical preparation for the job I didn’t have the right training and support that I needed once I qualified.

This is my whole argument because a company such as yourselves should understand that this job isn’t going to be for everyone and should have measures in place to identify people like me, who may find it a lot more challenging than someone who has worked on their own before or come from an engineering background.

When I joined British Gas I was ** and prior to this had worked in ************** for 4 years doing call centre work, straight away someone of my age and my previous job experience should have raised alarm bells as being a high risk individual. But rather than speak to me on a one to one basis by your PS department or give me a little bit longer after I became qualified so I could actually get a taste for what the job was. I was put in the same boat as everyone else and now I’m liable to pay a £9,000 training bond.

As soon as I realised that this Job wasn’t for me which was within a month of becoming qualified I made the decision to leave and go back to my old job which by me doing so meant I was taking over a £10,000 pay cut. That alone should prove to British Gas that I genuinely would of left sooner if I knew what the job was actually going to be like.

During my time at British Gas I did learn a lot about the smart metering program. I learnt that incidents had happened but not been released to the press, incidents in which it was extremely lucky customers hadn’t been hurt or worst, killed. How the engineers really carry out their work in a supposedly ’safe’ manner and how the company British Gas victimise people like my self regardless of your age into paying a huge amount of money after realising the job they applied for after only doing the actual job for a month isn’t for them.

British Gas as a company are more than happy enough to put people into a massive amount of debt after only working for the company for 6 months and doing the job it self for 1 month and certain individuals like my self this will put a huge strain on someone’s finical commitments and mental health for years and years to come.

If this can’t be resolved fairly the only other action I can take is to pass what I know over to numerous online press agencies and TV channels and really go into detail with what I’ve learned about the company, the manner in which meters are installed, incidents that have occurred, support which should be there but isn't and how the company treats its young apprentices.

I really do hope this can be resolved as that is the last option I’d want to take.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

B. B2 - ‘yes’ I am unsure what I write in the box below? Do I write ‘I am litigant and it must be heard in my local county court.’ It asks which court also?  State your Local county Court name if you know it

 

C - leave blank?  Yes that's for the claimant

 

F - Myself, do I need to state anything in the witness to which facts box next to it?  No just you your name

 

J - leave blank? Yes the claimant will post its directions to you later for approval and agreement

 

 

With regards to your comments for A3 ...this is not another opportunity to state a defence...just a simple explanation as to why you cant agree to mediation

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! I am going to get the letter sent off today.

 

. I am still unable to contact CST law, I was even giving the case handlers direct email and she 'apparently' tried ringing me 3 times as I was emailing her to no avail even though my phone was next to me, with signal, zero missed calls and no voicemail left.

 

Very disappointing from CST, 2 days later she has still yet to contact me. If it wasn't for this forum I wouldn't have a clue what I should be doing so again thank you for help. 

 

One thing I did want to mention with my home insurance I have what's called 'family legal protection' 

 

WWW.ADMIRAL.COM

Family Legal Protection will cover issues such as property or employment disputes, personal injury and personal identity theft. Get a quote with Admiral today

 

Do you think it is worth contacting them regarding the matter I am currently dealing with at this stage? 

Edited by dx100uk
added A few blank lines only..dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

What bit didn't you understand of

 

On 30/11/2021 at 15:01, FTMDave said:

Good grief.  CST Law are the enemy. 

and

 

23 hours ago, FTMDave said:

I see you were being harassed by Credit Style.  Well CST Law are simply Credit Style.  They're not a real firm of solicitors.  Credit Style admit this on their website.

Instead of wasting time with a debt collection agency get the court form filed and then think about the arguments you'll need to fight this claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know of anyone who is ahead of me in this process? If so, what was the outcome? 

 

I want to try and avoid adding even more to the balance hence why I said to CST I'm happy to put an offer across and get the whole thing dropped :(

 

If it does go to court what are possible outcomes? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at these three threads.  IIRC it's not they're ahead of you, more in parallel with you.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/419587-centricacst-claimform-industrial-training-bond/#comment-5028753

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/439918-centricacst-manual-claimform-scottish-gas-training-bond/#comment-5127871

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/437728-centrica-cst-reclaiming-training-bonds-as-overpaid-wages/#comment-5121350

 

I think the big question you need to answer is - do you accept you owe this money?  Because on the one hand the answer seems to be no and you file a defence to their claim, on the other hand the answer seems to be yes as you look to do a deal with them.  This half way house is getting you nowhere and you need to decide.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the only reason I tried to pay some of the balance off and have the whole case dropped is because I don't want to keep dealing with it and I made the assumption it will go to court (due to the original court letter) and I'll loose.

 

I 100% do not agree with the money owed like the other threads.

 

I will file the letter and wait to see what the next step is - I will post again once I have their reply.

 

By the way, I offered to pay £2,000 and get everything dropped this is what I was waiting for CST to get back to be regarding.

 

Thanks again! Will update when I know more :)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd not pay it

there are people in front of you 

go read those threads.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if we seem to be bombarding you with questions, but there is a reason.

 

Before you got the court claim, did you receive a letter with

   Letter Before Claim, or

   Letter of Claim, or

   Letter Before Action in the heading?

 

I don't mean the usual threatening letters DCAs send out, I mean a proper notification of intention to start a court case.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...