Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NFU Mutual - Failure of this Business Motor Insurance company lead to my +£9k loss in my business - can i sue?


Recommended Posts

Dear National Consumer Group

I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to seek legal advice concerning a significant issue I encountered with my current business motor insurance. The details of the situation are as follows:

On October 23, 2023, I discovered that my company's insurance coverage had been terminated due to a missed payment, of which I had not been previously informed. Despite notifying the insurance company of my change of address through multiple emails, reminders were sent to an outdated address, leaving me unaware of the missing payment.

When I inquired about the situation over the phone, the insurance company assured me that I could reinstate coverage by promptly making the missing payment. However, after the payment was made, they informed me that they could no longer cover my area in London and so they had to stop my insurance.

This unexpected turn of events caused a considerable amount of stress, particularly as my business relies on a unique vintage milk float from 1972 for deliveries of plastic-free groceries. Due to the vehicle's age and purpose, finding reasonably affordable insurance proved to be a challenging task. Despite my efforts to secure alternative coverage through brokers and insurers, I was unsuccessful, leading to a temporary halt in my business deliveries.

I also initiated a complaint regarding the incomplete change of address process, which underwent investigation by my insurance until November 30, 2023. They acknowledged finally their mistake and It wasn't until December 4, 2023, that I was able to reinstate my insurance. During this period, I faced a significant financial setback, impacting the peak sales season for my business, especially during the Christmas sales.

During this crucial time, I sought support from my customers through various channels. Unfortunately, despite their incredible support, the financial setback resulted in a precarious position for my company, leading to a loss of revenue and the departure of my main driver, Antonio, who found alternative employment due to the inoperability of the delivery van without insurance.

I have estimated the total loss to be approximately £7000, excluding the cost of hiring and training a new driver, the mental stress endured, and the additional workload undertaken to readjust my business operations.

In light of these challenges, I am seeking fair compensation of £9,500 to offset the financial setbacks my business has faced. I am reaching out to you for guidance on what I am entitled to request as fair compensation in this situation and if I could request more, and how I should proceed. I have already sent out a first letter with my sales reports from last year and this year to demonstrate the loss of revenue. Additionally, they offered £350 (with a cheque they sent out) for the stress, which I find almost disrespectful. They have requested me to send a bank statement, which I am prepared to do. However, before providing any further documentation, I would like to formalize my compensation request, especially since I am now seeking legal advice here.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I eagerly await your advice on the best course of action.

Sincerely,

C.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Failure Business Motor Insurance - a unique vintage milk float from 1972 for deliveries of plastic-free groceries.

who?

dx

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Failure of a Business Motor Insurance company lead to +£9k loss of business - can i sue?

Moved to legal issues part of the site.

Yes in theory you could sue the Insurance company for the loss you suffered. But do provide them with calculation plus evidence together in a letter before action, before you file the Court claim , giving them say 21 days to pay the amount.  And if they don't pay the amount or don't pay an amount you are satisfied with, then go ahead and issue the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may be able to do far better than the figure you think is fair.
There are various issues – including their breach of contract, failure to treat you fairly and communicate with you fairly and also in accurate data processing that refers to individuals rather than your business.
As my site team colleague @dx100uk has said, we need to know which insurance company you are dealing with. Also something about your business. What is the line of business and can you describe to us how it was impacted even if you don't want to give us the name et cetera of your business.

I see that you say that you are eagerly waiting advice – so we look equally to receive the responses to these questions.

They also suggest that you send insurance company a subject access request.

It will be extremely important that you provide evidence of your losses pointed out by my site team colleague  @unclebulgaria67 – both actual losses and the injury that you have suffered in terms of stress or distress  to you and your family.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, clareFW said:

as my business relies on a unique vintage milk float from 1972 for deliveries of plastic-free groceries

and with no driver thats pretty dead...:lol: when they did reinstate your ins...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,
Some of you may perhaps remember me ?
I was originally a member of this site way back in the early days when it first started, and was very active in the reclaiming bank charges section. An exciting and groundbreaking time ! 
Although I've not really been active herein since I do still often wave the flag for this site and all the wonderful, very knowledgeable and generous people on here, and I do encourage anyone with financial, consumer or legal issues or frustrations to come here, seek help and ideas (and also make a contribution upon their success).

So, it was myself who recommended to Claire that she come here to share her problems and experiences in a hope of getting some feedback and help.
Seeing the prompt, knowledgeable and supportive replies she's already received is a clear demonstration that my admiration for this essential site and it's wonderful members is not misplaced.  Thank you all.

I've some insight into the events leading to the original post, and think it best I don't get too involved, but I do know that Claire is immensely busy with work and life, so (after she has responded to the above posts) would appreciate if someone could kindly give her a brief explanation of the the kind of solutions and recompense she might be entitled to, the amount of time and effort it may take and the chances of success she might expect if she undertakes this herself.
Alternatively, would she be better handing matters over to a third party, and if so, perhaps whom (and hopefully this site would still get some small benefit from such route) ?

I'll now leave it to Claire to respond, update and interact with yourselves safe in the knowledge she's in good hands. Thank you all.

  • Like 2

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recall you photoman long time no see:classic_biggrin:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you all for your prompt responses.

I apologise for only being able to reply in the evenings; I'm the only driver for my plastic-free grocery delivery service, and I'm busy with deliveries throughout the day.

My insurance provider is NFU Mutual, currently the best option for my unique business, which involves using an electric milk float as the delivery van for plastic-free groceries, fitted in the van with a custom-made design and containers display.

I conduct deliveries every day from Tuesday to Sunday, covering North London, and also run a small shop that I can open when not delivering or when I have a driver which i used to have until my issue with the insurance. The bulk of my revenue comes from deliveries, and the shop serves as an additional source.

When my motor insurance was unexpectedly halted, the shop became a crucial alternative, allowing me to redirect customers there, and ensure a minimum revenue. However, its accessibility was limited for many of my customers. The delivery aspect is essential as it enables me to reach people who face challenges in physically shopping, such as those with disabilities, young children, the elderly, or those without transportation or time.

During the period when my insurance was suspended, I decided to use my private car to continue reaching customers. However, this posed significant challenges as my usual operations involved utilising the van to pick up customers' containers, fill them on the spot from the van, and deliver them back.  The transition to my private car required entirely different and more time-consuming procedures.

Handling the shop, managing deliveries, addressing customer service concerns, dealing with booking cancellations, and navigating the insurance situation—all on my own, alongside caring for my two children—left me finishing each day extremely late and starting very early.

The entire month took a toll on my physical well-being, compounded by the stress of uncertainty regarding the insurance investigation, and whether my company could endure the financial setback.

I discovered i wasn't insured  On October 23, 2023, and they put it back the 4th of December

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start off by sending a subject access request. Subject access requests offer personal data – not company data. I suppose the insurance was taken out in your companies name? However, you may as well try it.

You seem to have a lot of information about what happened – the fact that reminders went to a previous address et cetera. Much of this have you got in writing?
The key to sorting this out is to make sure that you have got a good file of evidence which substantiates every complaint you are making in every point you are making.
Also, please do be aware that we are all volunteers here. No one gets paid and maybe you could cut down a little bit on the narrative and simply give us the facts that we need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you and  sure, 

yes, everything is in writing, i have made sure to write to the insurance during the time they stopped to remind them about facts,  also had calls with them that they recorded, and they also sent a letter acknowledging the fact they made a mistake.

the insurance was under my company name yes

can you clarify this?' 

Start off by sending a subject access request, ' .

Should i send it to them ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, send it to the insurer because you need to know everything that they know. If you follow the subject access request link, then you will find a template which can be modified if you want and also you will find information about what you are entitled to have stop
you should accompany the subject access request with proof of your identity such as a utility bill or something.

Of course be prepared for them to decline on the basis that it isn't personal data it is business data – but let us try anyway.

Of course it is very helpful that you have everything in writing anyway – but it is worth fishing around to see what else might be available

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from their contractual responsibilities, the insurers are bound by certain statutory regulations devised and implemented by the FCA under the authority of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

These provide a number of pretty strict rules – but unfortunately the public seem to know very little about them and as a result they are not very often enforced and I'm not aware of anybody bringing any legal actions on them.
However you have a right to bring a legal action and to claim damages.

If you are happy to do this and it seems appropriate then we will help you.

You should start off by having a look at the ICOBS rules contained in the FCA Handbook

WWW.HANDBOOK.FCA.ORG.UK

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, clareFW said:

sure, ok, will do that asap, thank you 

ASAP should mean tomorrow. I'm afraid you're going to have to find some time to put in some basic spadework to get additional evidence. The quicker you get it going the quicker it will happen.
Organisations have up to 30 days to respond to a subject access request and you can be certain they take it right up to the limit.

Get this done quickly and then you can settle back for a little while but we will start having a look at the whole situation. You should certainly be looking at the ICOBS rules because they may well form the basis of an action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to NFU Mutual - Failure of this Business Motor Insurance company lead to my +£9k loss in my business - can i sue?
  • 2 weeks later...

What date did you send it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Using our advice on how to prepare your court bundle I suggest that you use roughly the same method to arrange the documents that you have received as well as an index sheet.

Then start inspecting it for what it contains but also maybe more importantly anything that it doesn't contain..

Compare it with your own document so emails that you have and also your own records of any telephone conversations and see if they have supplied everything. Very important to understand if anything is missing and if so what

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

@clareFW

I would want to see the NFU Mutual letter of 4/12/23 in which they admit their mistake.

Can you upload a pdf version of this, with any personal info redacted.

And also please provide a breakdown of your £9500 calculation of loss.

Why did the Direct Debit payment fail to go through originally?  Did you not receive a communication from your Bank about this payment not going through? If you took this to court, NFU might ask for you to supply copies of Bank records including notifications. 

You may have to accept partial blame for the loss and reflect this in the amount you are seeking.  

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Clare

Thank you for your reply 

Attached is the letter.

I haven't received a letter from the bank. 

£9500 breakdown:  I expected a revenue of around £17,994.48 between October 23 and December 4, 2023, which was my last year's revenue. However, I only managed to generate £11,043.73, resulting in a loss of £6,951.48. Additionally, the cost of hiring and training a new driver is estimated at £2,500, as the process will inevitably slow down my business operations. 

I haven't added any other financial requests but i haven't quantified the extra work I had during and after this period & the stress resulted.

Final Decision Letter.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Claire,

Firstly, regarding the attached letter from the insurers, I note in their letter they say:
"We have let you down, so I am awarding £350. A cheque for this amount will be sent under a separate cover. compensation to be transferred into your nominated bank account. Please allow 14 working days for the payment to be received. I hope this will help make up for the poor service received".

Could you please clarify what the £350 'award' cheque is for ?
Take care, because if you actually bank this they might claim this is your acceptance of their offer and 'case closed'. Also be careful not to sign anything.
Could you also clarify what they are referring to when they mention "..compensation to be transferred into your nominated bank account".  
What are they referring to ? Is this a sum separate to the £350, and why are they calling it 'compensation' ?
Again, take care about accepting it and do not sign anything.

As for your claim generally, you say above:
"....resulting in a loss of £6,951.48. Additionally, the cost of hiring and training a new driver is estimated at £2,500, as the process will inevitably slow down my business operations. I haven't added any other financial requests but i haven't quantified the extra work I had during and after this period & the stress resulted".

Personally, I think you might be entitled to more.
In the first instance, you will also have suffered financial loss due to the loss of goodwill from existing customers, who during the time you could not operate would have had to seek goods elsewhere, and some would have have frustrated by your poor service. Of course, not all would know that was not your fault, but in any case, some of them will no longer remain your customers, so that is a consequential loss of income from the same incident.
In my view, I think you have a case to claim for those losses too.


There might also be other types of compensation you should receive (other members here can probably better explain the various types of  compensation, which if I recall are: Compensatory, Punitive and Exemplary).
Plus of course, on top of everything, you should also receive interest, as that has also been lost due to you not having the sums in your own account to earn interest.

These are my own thoughts.... but I'm sure others here who are more knowledgeable and experienced will have more to add.

regards to all


 

 

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did the Direct Debit fail to go through ?

If you had financial issues or your Bank made an error, then this is part of the picture.

I don't think you can rely on NFU writing to old address leading to cancellation.

If you ask for too much, NFU are likely to refuse to offer much more. They might increase the offer a bit. And then you would then be left with decision whether to issue letter before action letter stating losses (including evidence) and then if NFU fail to respond issue Court claim

If you end up in Court, then you will be required to provide much more information including full disclosure of your finances  business accounts etc. If a Direct Debit failed, why did your Bank not contact you ?

No reason not to Bank £350, but advise that this is not acceptance of any settlement, as the amount does not cover losses incurred.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

- direct debit failed for not enough money on that day on the account.

-  a £350 has been sent to my address as compensation for the stress, i didn't not yet put it on my account. . First they offer £100 that i rejected over the phone. they then increased to 350 by mail. 

- compensation to be transferred into your nominated bank account".  means the cheque is addressed to my bank account

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...