Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKCPS MNPR PCN - Gateway House Piccadilly Manchester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I'm a Uber driver with a hired car,

I received a fine stating "no stopping" at Gateway House in Manchester,

I dropped off a regular customer which I've been using this part of the station for years,

I've read that its changed and somehow you are not allowed to use it.

  Is there anyway I can avoid paying these people my hard earned money which I need more than them, 

any advice will be much appreciated.

I have read previous threads but thought it would be better to start a new topic.

Thanking you in  advance

Regards

MK

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

Thank you for creating your own thread, it's the best thing to do. I'm afraid I've had to remove your attachments because you've left in your car registration, a photo with the car reg, the reference number and other information that identifies you.

 

The best thing is to edit them carefully and repost them as a single pdf file to keep this confidential. Our upload guide has details.

 

Best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And please highlight where the paperwork says FINE please??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once you've sorted out the attachments, please could you let us have the information requested in the forum sticky so that we can advise you?

 

 

You'll see quite a few other threads about Gateway House that will be worth following for you.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 18th February 2020

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 3rd March 2020

3 Date received A few days later 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up No

7 Who is the parking company? UKCPS 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Gateway Piccadilly Manchester 

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of ukpcs gateway threads here to follow and read

use our custom google search box on this page

 

bottom line

ignore everything until the  letter of claim.

 

example that answer just about every perceivable question you might have

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

Ericsbrother is telling you they issued the NTK a day too late to ground Keeper liability, and further as it is a prohibition as in No Stopping, and their invoices rely on Contract Law, no contract for you to pay squat can be legally formed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've converted your image to PDF so only registered Caggers can view it, best to keep the fleecers guessing.

 

Just ignore the letter - but don't ignore a Letter Before Action if they ever send one.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you were told almost a month ago to get reading up.

to date you've not read one other thread relating to this no stopping rubbish??

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will start now but due to current issues I totally forgot 

 

No excuse 

 

Much appreciated 

 

Thank you 

 

Thank you for reminding me 

 

On 02/04/2020 at 14:53, brassnecked said:

 

Ericsbrother is telling you they issued the NTK a day too late to ground Keeper liability, and further as it is a prohibition as in No Stopping, and their invoices rely on Contract Law, no contract for you to pay squat can be legally formed.

So should  I wait for letter before action

 

Thanking you again in advance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

had to be issued by the 2nd and delivered by the 4th.

So no cigar for them even if they got it to his doormat in time.

 

You now ignore any further correspondence until such time they threaten to take you to court. Keep us informed and try and get some pictures of the road, its markings and the signage there if possible just in case. Many peopel get into a lather because they didnt and when they get sued 2 years later the signs have changed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone 

 

hope all is well during the lockdown 

 

i received the following letter in the post from a recovery firm, please can you kindly advise what I should be doing in this matter.

 

thanking you in advance 

 

regards 

Mk

 

Apologies here is the letter, somehow iPhone wouldn't allow me to attach it

 

Regards

MK

 

DR+ Gateway Picca.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

I'd say do nothing, but see what the guys think when they're able to get here. Please don't respond unless one of the regulars says to, because doing what DR+ say could cause you additional problems. It's not urgent. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and is that a letter before claim...no ....its from a powerless DCA that have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt..

 

please get reading up as already advised or atleast read this thread 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have read  enough thread to know that  a begging letter from a toothless DCA is their fist port of call. Note that the  amount asked for has goen up. this addition is called unicorn food tax as it is completely unlawful to add to the amount  on the NTK that was sent out under the conditions they rely on the POFA to create a liability.

You ignore the DCA completely

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Open

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a formal notice of intention to commence legal proceedings, so you need to reply.

 

We had a spate of these letters in January & February.  All the motorists replied with a snotty letter.  None have been taken to court.  So you need to do the same.

 

Have a look at post 9 at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/431634-ukcps-2xmnpr-pcn-lbc-no-stopping-manchester-piccadilly-gateway-house/  and post 6 at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/431431-ukcpscst-2-mnpr-pcns-letter-before-claim-no-stopping-gateway-house-piccadilly/?tab=comments#comment-5093077

 and draft something similar.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...