Link Parking PCN n- ow gladstone letter of claim - used Incorrect machine for area - Llynfi Court, Llynfi Lane, Bridgend ***Claim Discontinued***

[ericsbrother]

block their email addy and set any response to bounce back.

Now as they have decided that you are liable then let this one run and run, if they take you to court you can prove that they are vexatious litigants  and earn a few quid out of them..

 

If you have sent them anything since consulting this forum please tell us what as the advice we always give is to wait for specific advice on the what and when and it will nevr be before they ahve wasted their money chasing you for a good while.

So you keep quiet from now on as far as they are concerned and let us knwo what they send next, probably a threatogram from a useless dca.

[Brunowales]

Hi ericsbrother

 

I have not sent them anything.  The only correspondence was the 2 appeals my wife made thats it.

[ericsbrother]

ANY correspondence is bad, the appeals removes protections that you have in law against presumption or liability unless specific requirements are met so we always say dont appeal u8nless there are very good reasons for doing so and generally that is only around the grace period not being considered.

[Brunowales]

Hi All

 

I have received a letter from BW Legal regarding the PCN.  Its addressed to me even though my wife is registered keeper and stated this in the appeal she submitted as well as stating she was the driver.  They have also said that we have failed to make a payment (true) or raised an appeal within 28 days of the PCN (false).

 

They are demanding £100 for PCN and £60 in legal costs.  The letter states that these charges are detailed in the car park signage terms and conditions that are clearly displayed in the client signage - there is no such signage - during the appeal they sent a jpeg image of what a sign looks like there isnt one in the car park.

 

Shall I respond to this letter pointing out the flaws in their findings - could someone please advise - many thanks.

[brassnecked]

Don't  respond to anything yet until the regulars here have come back to you

[ericsbrother]

as they are chasing the wrong person and you have proof that you have already told them this I would do nothing and let them sue you as they will automatically lose and it will then cost them the same to sue your wife and they will still lose if they are minded to do so. Your combined expenses claim for the day at court will put an end to that.

 

So you and your wife do nothing until they actually issue a court summons and then you have to respond. Anyhting before that and you will invite them to correct themselves and actually stand a chance of winning a claim.

[Brunowales]

I have now received a letter of claim from BW Legal for the PCN - will now wait for the claim form,

[dx100uk]

now time for an ericsbrothers snotty / insulting letter.

you must reply within 30days.

plenty in threads here already.

[ericsbrother]

so

Dear sirs,

It is apparent that your clients cant read or they would know that there isnt a sign at the location they are referring to for people who can read to peruse.

Obviously as Will and John of the IPC have personally approved every sign used by your clients soemone has read out to Link what it should say but that doesnt excuse them for not putting the damed things up. I look forward to your clients next move, I could do with a day out in Pontypridd so 5 minutes in court will pay for that.

[Brunowales]

Hi ericsbrother

 

That letter will be winging its way tomorrow lol. Thanks very much 

[dx100uk]

posts moved town thread

 

 

[ericsbrother]

you can use thsi as being persuasive in your case. It may well be the same judge so even easier but you have to raise the issue in your WS and not rely on mentioning it on the day

[AndyOrch]

Unlocked

[Brunowales]

Thanks very much Andy

 

Just want to update thread, received letter out of blue from BW Legal offering 20% discount on debt of £160 for parking fine.

 

My initial thought is to ignore does everyone agree?

[dx100uk]

begging letter..where does it say they are fining you please?

[ericsbrother]

so BWL are happy to take a mre £28 for writing to you. they get paid by Link as well so dont feel sorry for them

[Brunowales]

Hi All

Thought this had gone but have received yet another letter of claim from BW legal.

 

I sent a SAR to Link when I received the last letter and replied to BW stating this.  Received the SAR last September and not heard anything since.

 

Is it worth replying to these muppets or just wait for the claim to drop?

[lookinforinfo]

If the LOC was addressed to you just sit back and start working out how to spend the money they will have to pay you.

[dx100uk]

You must reply

Time for the ericsbrother snooth/insulting letter

 

Lots of examples here

Use our search top right

[brassnecked]

Yes as insulting as possible possibly referring to any you sent last time they tried it, so a

"Despite my correspondence outlining your lack of grasp that I know and you know that you have a case founded on sand...

[lookinforinfo]

You have already sent one last year-could you please post up their reply. 

[brassnecked]

Wonder if they left it alone after first letter, then thought its been a year, lets have another try?

[Brunowales]

After I sent a reply to the last letter before claim, I heard nothing from them until the latest one.

 

Link send some documents etc in the SAR but what they sent was just photos etc pretty poor to be honest.

 

I am going to respond stating that this will be the last correspondence I will be sending and for them to issue a claim if they feel they have a case.

[lookinforinfo]

As they didn't respond, I would be inclined to resend your first response to their LoC just so they can't sat that they never received the first one. 

I would also point out that as this is the second LoC you could ask if this another one of a series or are they so useless that they don't even know that they sent you one last year.

[brassnecked]

   So I refer you to my previous reply to your other LOC, which I copy below for your info with date of original on they can't say never had it then.  If they do try court it will be disclosed to the court making them look silly.