Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

have a unpaid debt with anglian water.

ccj granted march 2013 for a debt of £1,341,98.

agreed with them to pay debt off at £5 per month.

after a financial income check incomings outgoings.

 

we applied to pay this debt by direct debit payment.

they said it could not be done.

 

over the period of time we reduced this debt to about £300.

for some reason they cancelled the agreement and enforced this with the high court enforcement group who visited me today.

informing me they are collecting a debt of £2,041.15 for anglian water.

 

rather annoyed to find that anglian water never told me of there intentions or giving me a chance to put my case to the court.

 

where is the common sense the debt reducing.

then they treble the debt

 

to be honest struggle paying this amount.

is the court system just got no sense before they decide what actions they take on people.

 

any advice available here please .

 

contacted anglian water waiting for call back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how did you agree to pay it off

through a tomlin order

or direct to Anglia water?

 

why did you not defend the CCJ?

and is this now a second judgement?

 

have you checked your credit file?

you should have received numerous letters before the HCEO visit?

do they not know your correct address?

 

somethings not right here given the timeline you've stated.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your reply

 

1 agreed payment direct with anglian water after they sought judgement would not negotiate without judgement. payments where sent via payments through store ect.

 

this ccj was obtained in march 2013 was defended but admitted the debt due to get installment plan .

 

this is the same judgement seems to have been enforced. this is what credit file says

 

Name ....

Address ....

Judgment date 21/03/2013

Amount £ 1,347

Court name Northampton Ccbc

 

had no letters at all sent e mails and contacted anglian water asking for some explanation.

 

also the copies of all payments made balance before a high court writ ...would have been very small about £300.

 

nothing at all from anyone was not aware we have continued the agreed payments to anglian water.

 

We were unaware we was shocked . the debt has now been trebled

 

this is the payment booklet we have used also this is the letter the bailiffs left

20190104_121800.jpg

20190104_121625 (2).jpg

20190104_121800.jpg

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to say but you need to put your attachments into a multi page PDF then upload that. Remember to redact personal details. As for the total they are demanding then this will be based upon the original CCJ total and sounds very much that AW may not have informed them of any receipts.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uploads hidden you must redact them!!

 

Read upload

One multipage pdf only please

Pers details removed from above post

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have e mailed anglian water asking for any letters sent to me . also a full list of all payments made to them by us. some form of explanation to there actions considering the debt was being reduced. im gutted about this matter .so please all advice is most greatfull on how we move forward thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

or send them an sar

then they cant hide stuff

its a legal request.

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

PS you really should NOT be using email nor the phone

WRITE so you have a papertrail

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to note well and this is no criticism of you as the chances are it was never explained.

 

I assume the payment proposal you had with them was to pay a certain amount on a certain date. This should have been paid in clear funds to reach your part of their account. I note you that you seemed to use something like Paypoint at a local Newsagents, to keep this in context then it could have been up to 10 days later before your account was credited due to processing times. If this is the case then AW can rightly say you paid late and could be justified in going for enforcement.

 

When writing to AW ask that they hold off enforcement temporarily whilst you investigate your payments to them.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a unpaid debt with anglian water. CCJ granted march 2013 for a debt of £1,341,98.

 

Over the period of time we reduced this debt to about £300. For some reason they cancelled the agreement and enforced this with the high court enforcement group who visited me today informing me they are collecting a debt of £2,041.15 for anglian water.

 

Something is definitely not right so please do contact Anglian Water to investigate.

 

You mention that your repayments led to the debt being reduced to just £300. If that is the case, then the High Court Enforcement company should not have been instructed as they cannot enforce a debt that is less than £600.

 

You have not mentioned what action (if any) has been taken by the HCEO. Did the enforcement agent just leave a letter or did he gain entry into your premises?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something is definitely not right so please do contact Anglian Water to investigate.

 

You mention that your repayments led to the debt being reduced to just £300. If that is the case, then the High Court Enforcement company should not have been instructed as they cannot enforce a debt that is less than £600.

 

You have not mentioned what action (if any) has been taken by the HCEO. Did the enforcement agent just leave a letter or did he gain entry into your premises?

 

I think they meant that they reduced the debt by £300 as per the £5 a month paid over the last couple of years? If they originally had a CCJ and the judge agreed to the £5 DD every month, how can a second CCJ be raised for the same debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

An application to Stay the Enforcement might be a good move and an application to set an affordable payment with the court. You don't have to let the HCEO in and it might be better to keep them out and hide any car in the meantime. Ploddertom, BA, and others will probably have some further good advice soon

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

have had contact with debt enforcement at anglian water.

 

stated agreement was not paid on time and on the dates required.

due to this they cancelled the agreement.

 

they do not deny the balance was reducing to the originol debt.

notice was given they state in writing enforcement action would be commenced.

situation we have today arrived at.

 

we have confirmed that on no occasion have we had letters from anglian water re this matter.

they said we sent these you should contact the postal service and raise the matter with them .

they will not be blamed for this failure.

 

anglian water have asked me to make a lite application to them they will forward this via e mail..

they have my e mail address .

they have agreed to call off the bailiffs until they decide the lite application.

 

they will respond on the SAR request within 1 month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats a 'lite' application ???

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As discussed earlier, please find a copy of the Low Income Tariff for Eligible households (LITE) application form attached.

 

 

 

Please complete the form and return to us by post. Alternatively you can visit our website https://www.anglianwater.co.uk/household/your-account/bills-and-payments/tariffs/lite/lite-application-form.aspx and complete the form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok looking better then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...