Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My partner has a buy to let mortgage and the estate agent has failed to credit the rental money into partner's account for two months running.

This has has the knock-on effect of two mortgages being unpaid.

 

The outstanding funds have now been credited to the account but neither mortgage company seems willing to remove the late payments.

 

I know that we can add the reason for the late payment to the credit file but is there any way to get it removed please?

 

The Estate agent will write letters to confirm that they were at fault and pay the bank and mortgage charges but is that enough when they have wrecked my parner's credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they applied for any credit accounts within 12 months, 2 late payment markers might cause them a problem. Also if existing credit cards are subject to credit file reviews, then it is possible interest rates might be increased.

 

The mortgage companies on receipt of Estate Agent letters could at their discretion clear the late payment markers, but they don't have to. If the markers caused any problems and the cost could be calculated, then you could sue the Estate Agent if necessary.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your comments which were better than I thought.

One of the mortgage companies has already said that even a letter from the Estate agent will not mean that they will remove the late payment marker.

Of course my partner was amiss in not picking up the estate agent's error but it does seem a bit over the top not to remove the marker when it is obvious that the non payment would not have occurred had the agent done the job they are paid to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your beef is with the estate agent, you have a mortgage that wasnt paid, the mechanics of how you pay it is nothing to do with the mortgage conditions. In truth the markers wont have affected you but if they do in the future you can sue the EA for your losses. So, for example, refused a loan at an advertised super low rate and forced to accept a higher rate? sue for the difference in the cost of repayments. Almost worth taking out a loan just to test this and bury them

The agents should belong to a trade organisation like ARLA, get a complaint going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sack the estate agent and report them to the trade organisation as ericsbrother suggested.

Do you really need an estate agent to collect rent?

They don't do anything, I don't think they collect cash at the door, do they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also check to see if they are registered with National Association of Estate Agents (NAEA): http://www.naea.co.uk/

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your partner is responsible for the mortgage being paid on time everytime. Insufficient funds in the account is your partners responsibility. Didn't notice the 1st month????? Then you should be looking more closely at your partner and not blaming the agent. Its a separate issue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your partner is responsible for the mortgage being paid on time everytime. Insufficient funds in the account is your partners responsibility. Didn't notice the 1st month????? Then you should be looking more closely at your partner and not blaming the agent. Its a separate issue

 

Thank you Sgt Bush we can always rely on you for your unvarnished truth.

 

You may not like the way it was phrased, but the underlying message (it isn't the mortgage company's responsibility to check) isn't wrong.

 

If you want to claim damages against the estate agent expect them to rely on the fact that you have an obligation to 'mitigate your loss'.

It remains your responsibility to ensure the mortgage was paid ..... you had the option to

a) chase the estate agent, before the payment was due, or

b) seek the funds elsewhere, ensuring the mortgage payment was made. If you had done this, and the cost was still less than the damages that would have been caused, then the estate agent would be liable for the costs (such as interest) you incurred in doing so.

 

I'm sorry if this isn't what you want to hear, but I can't be sorry for pointing out the law that the estate agency are likely to rely on to limit the damages you could recover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no point sugar coating answers and patting people on the head saying it will be alright, Someone else is to blame when their isn't.

The two are seperate issues and are not interchangeable to a point

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be a bit more constructive, your credit score includes a scoring for your ability to cope with the unexpected.

 

If you are renting out a property you cannot guarantee that rent will be paid on time every month as you are often dependent on your tenants being paid on time in the same way that the mortgage company are dependent on you being paid on time. Or the boiler may break down requiring a sudden need to find a thousand or two.

 

Ideally, people should have savings that cover such scenarios.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to all who have answered my questions it is appreciated.

 

To Sgt Bush et al-I had already acknowledged in post 4 that my partner should have picked up on the error so your comments were superflous. I am not blaming the agent for the non payment of the mortgage, I am blaming them for not paying the agreed funds into the account. The fact that my partner was undergoing a serious operationover plus moving house over that period was the reason the non payments were missed but does not excuse the agent.

Estate Agents find tenants for landlords and they charge high fees for doing so. In this instance the agent is a large reputable London company who has dealt with my partner and the tenant

for several years. The tenant has always paid on the right date so it is reasonable to expect that the Agent will forward that money less their fees as required in a tiimely fashion as stipulated in their contract. The fact that they didn't puts them in a position that they are liable for the cost of their breach of the contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to all who have answered my questions it is appreciated.

 

To Sgt Bush et al-I had already acknowledged in post 4 that my partner should have picked up on the error so your comments were superflous. I am not blaming the agent for the non payment of the mortgage, I am blaming them for not paying the agreed funds into the account. The fact that my partner was undergoing a serious operationover plus moving house over that period was the reason the non payments were missed but does not excuse the agent.

Estate Agents find tenants for landlords and they charge high fees for doing so. In this instance the agent is a large reputable London company who has dealt with my partner and the tenant

for several years. The tenant has always paid on the right date so it is reasonable to expect that the Agent will forward that money less their fees as required in a tiimely fashion as stipulated in their contract. The fact that they didn't puts them in a position that they are liable for the cost of their breach of the contract.

 

And this is a great opportunity for you to get rid of the estate agent and get the rent transferred directly to your account, saving rip off fees in the mean time.

Ok, they found a tenant, but then they just acted as a middle man taking a slice of your money for organising a standing order: 3 minute job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that they didn't puts them in a position that they are liable for the cost of their breach of the contract.

Subject to:

1) is there an applicable (limitation and / or exclusion) clause in the contract

2) Your obligation to mitigate your loss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this is a great opportunity for you to get rid of the estate agent and get the rent transferred directly to your account, saving rip off fees in the mean time.

Ok, they found a tenant, but then they just acted as a middle man taking a slice of your money for organising a standing order: 3 minute job.

 

If there was just one tenant that would be a possibility and it depends on the tenant for a start and the more tenants you have, the more the problems add up. In an ideal world you would be right of course but if you want a quieter life where the possible ongoing legal problemsetc dealing with tenants is handled by the estate agent the one has to bite the bullet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...