Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell hounding for 3 debt already paid.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I owed £15.00 on a 3mobile which Lowells bought along with a Capital Credit Card debt.

 

This was all paid off

- can't remember the exact date as I do not have the paperwork to hand- around 2013.

 

.On 21/6/15 I received a letter stated that I still owed them money.

I wrote to them & received a letter on 18/8/15 stating they confirmed the debt had been paid & assured me no further action would be taken & my file would be cleared.

 

On 27/2/17 Lowell's & 3G appeared again requesting a payment for £741.20!

 

I have emailed a complaint to them & they have replied

'that they are looking into this matter'

 

QUESTION

- How do I get these vile creatures off my back.

Do I report them to OFT or FO or both.

 

I am finding this quite distressing as it took such a long.long time to sort this matter in the past.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could it relate to other fees on the account with 3G e.g early termination of contract ?

 

It is up to Lowell to provide evidence of the debt and you can take it up with 3G, if there is an issue. Perhaps there has been a mistake.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure it's the same account? If it is then frankly I would be attacking them for some compensation. It's clearly a data protection breach. They hound you for money if you get it wrong, it seems to me only fair that you should reciprocate.

 

By the way, have you checked your credit file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the mistake was you blindly paid the debt..

now they think you are a mug and will fall for any old demand.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a prove it letter, bear in mind they seem to be phoning and texting debtors and alleged debtors recently, so say nothing on the phone unless you can record the call, and save any texts. Could be useful if they are hounding you for a non debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses.

 

 

I had a credit card debt that was bought by the same company along with the £15.00 mobile debt.

 

Without being too harsh towards dx's comments

- I spent years (with thanks to this website) sending letters to the debt collection company,

I attended the High Courts of Justice London 5 times.

 

I was recovering from cancer & had had enough so through a solicitor a negotiated payment was made & I have documented proof that all was settled.

 

Obviously if the debt company decides to take this further I will contest this as I have previously as I am not a mug.

 

I would like to know who I can contact to make a complaint regarding this company as I would not wish for others to go through this - FOS?

 

Thank you to the person who suggested a credit score report.

I am awaiting my credit file report

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you not get your file online at noddle or clearscore now.?

 

is this the same account number as the one you settled via a solicitor?

 

what is sending letters to DCA's [bad move just invites letter tennis] and being in high court? 5 times ,got to do with you not being mugged the first time around?

 

trying to understand the story....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just an update re Lowells.

Nothing appeared on my credit score.

 

 

I emailed Lowells advising them them to look into their records as I received correspondence in 2015 stating that the original debt of £5.00 to 3Mobile had been settled.

 

I received an email from them apologising & informing me a cheque for £250.00 would be sent in the post.

No further action to be taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£250! wow!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post that letter up where they say about the £250?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

lowell email re £250..

 

 

I note from your correspondence that you have referred to an email from Lowell dated 18/5/15 in which we acknowledged that the account had been paid, that we apologised for failing to close the account and that we stated was now closed.

 

I have read the email sent to you.

I can see that it acknowledges that you had previously paid the above account with BWlegal and that an apology was given with assurance that the matter would be closed.

 

The account was unfortunately not closed as stated and as such further correspondence was sent to you in error, as well as the text message that you received.

(i received numerous text messages and phone calls).

 

Having reviewed the account in detail I have found that we have failed to undertake the account as stated.

 

The person who initially wrote to you failed to close the account a stated.

 

Please accept my sincere apologies for this further contact which should not have occurred for the second time.

 

In light of the above information I am upholding your complaint.

As a gesture of goodwill I have arranged for a cheque to be issued for £250.00.

This will be issued within the next 10 working day.

 

Please be assured that the account is now closed and you will hear nothing further on the matter.

Relevant feedback has also been given to the colleague concerned..

 

If you disagree with how I reached my conclusion please do not hesitate to contact me telling me your reason and include any evidence that has not already been provided that you think is important in your case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh the old gesture of goodwill. At least it is now closed and they have paid you compensation.

 

It's up to you if you wish to file a formal complain, as who knows how many others its happened to, and how many people became extremely scared and paid up extra.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have paid you the likely amount you would have got from them in a court claim for breaches of the DPA.

 

 

they save money and their reputation ( cough) by paying up now.

 

 

The presumption is that you will now not report them to the regulatory authorities.

 

 

If you did they would claim the matter is settled to your satisfaction

 

 

but that really isnt the point about why ombudsmen are needed

but it is lilely nothing else would happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...