Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • as with some of your threads in the past. you are not reading things carefully and understanding things properly by going off on assumptions. not sure where you are getting your driving licence is being revoked from? nowhere do they use that word. nothing to do with it. vehicle excise licence. (Road Tax), a VEL cannot be revoked only voided. you are also wrong and nowhere does the DVLA state they cancelled the DD.  the court summons clearly states in the DVLA statement: it was your cancelling/reclaim of the DD on 15-02-2024 that caused this, NOTHING to do with the DVLA, they did not revoke the VEL. as they received no payment, on 02.05.2024 the VEL was Voided. it appears you have got the new DD setup wrong to the wrong DVLA account/ref number/VEL number. they have not received the payments to the correct VEL. i would be ringing DVLA and finding out where these payments are on their system and get them attributed to the correct VEL. that should solve the problem.
    • read the guide carefully  its all there CAG is 99% self help.   dx  
    • Edit :  I see what's happened its NOT to do with the Trustpilot review ... What i did was on Saturday night after being told by P2g that the parcel had been lost i sent an email saying that id like a refund and the £10 offer plus pre pay postage is to do with that ...         Ref: P2G1246   Good Morning Andrew,   Thanks for your Trustpilot review.   Unfortunately, as you did not purchase protection we cannot proceed with the claim and sadly you are not eligible for a claim settlement on this occasion. A refund of the carriage has been processed. I am happy to add £10.00 to your Prepay account, if you would like to accept this, please let me know and I will get this added for you. I'm so sorry for the inconvenience caused by this. I look forward to hearing from you. Kindest Regards Hannah Hogarth
    • just fyi prepay is £10 credit for their site. its not actual money you are tied to using on their site just fyi
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Solicitors & j d Williams catalogue


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2185 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

[when jdw find the agreement I will have to pay in full/QUOTE]

 

Says it all really. If their filing/computer/data systems are so bad how do they stay in business?

Illegitimi non carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the 12 + 2 days for cca was up on 6th march....and its now 22nd and they say jdw still trying to retrieve it from their archives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then until they do no dice fleecers

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you've already sent this?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?436-Failure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale.

 

So ignore anything they send unless it's a valid cca, and whatever they send post it up here for checking first.

 

And don't forget the unlawful charges.

Illegitimi non carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I sent cca request with fee etc as per CAG instructions...then after the 12 + 2 days and a few more, and lowells 3rd letter saying still waiting for cca but contact us if you have any questions etc, I then sent the formal dispute re no cca. so yes I will ignore them now until they can send a cca and will get anything they send as a cca checked here. They seem to think there is no dispute as the cca will get there eventually........

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to think there is no dispute as the cca will get there eventually........
.....And upon the second coming we will all bow down in the glory of the lord and bask in his light and all things will be made clear unto the Pharasees and the Hippotites and the way will be made right for all.......

 

Sorry, almost believed what they said. Nothing changes, no cca = no pay.

 

(and eventually is a wonderful way of looking at it. eventually all things must pass. )

Illegitimi non carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well well well.....letter from Lowell this morning

 

Dear not so daft and well informed cagger

 

We refer to your recent request for a cca for this account.

 

After laising with JDW in an effort to obtain this document we have been informed that it is no longer available due to the length of time since the account was opened by you.

 

At this time we have closed our file and will not make any further contact with you concerning payment against the account unless the copy of the agreement is received at some point in the future from JDW.

 

So, if its not available.......how can a copy be received? and if a copy can be received why haven't they done it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I thought .........Many thanks to dx and yourself Brigadier, as this would have cost me £293 to Lowell had I not come here first for help. And in that amount was over £100 in added charges. As it stands it would have been SB in 2015, so am guessing it will sit on credit report file until then and hopefully disappear?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you on behalf of dx and myself!!

Yes the default will be removed on its 6th anniversary.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep an occasional eye on your credit files and if Losers place any additional information, or try to extend the limit dates or whatever be ready to deliver a short, sharp shock to their banking system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt you will see any further reporting from Lowell.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have had an email from Lowell Soft...detailed as part of the Lowell Group.

 

It seems like a phishing thing, as it says they hold this email addy for me and want to help blah blah

and I should ring them, and then goes on to say that if I don't want them to contact me at this addy I should ring and quote a ref no.

 

I have no intention to ring at all.

 

Have never heard of "Lowell Soft" is this something new or just my first experience of it?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it. A few dcas are starting to use this trick. Its a new style of the old phishing letter. Add the address to your providers spam list.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had an email from Lowell Soft...detailed as part of the Lowell Group. It seems like a phishing thing, as it says they hold this email addy for me and want to help blah blah and I should ring them, and then goes on to say that if I don't want them to contact me at this addy I should ring and quote a ref no. I have no intention to ring at all. Have never heard of "Lowell Soft" is this something new or just my first experience of it?.

 

Definitely ignore and re-route all e-mails to junk!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't say I've heard of this either, nothing on it on Google.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think they forgot to add the 'in the head' bit :)

  • Confused 1
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some pdls have tried this and dcas are copying them. Dont be surprised to see more of this popping up

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

now emails are coming from sam N parcs-lowell home retail group, saying they are debt managers and I am to contact them urgently. Seems a variety of names associated with Lowell. I haven't and wont respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another one of Lowells' feeble attempts to make you feel that this mob are in a position of authority (in their dreams).

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...