Jump to content


UKCPS/? PCN nov 2015 Claimform - Driver-passengers observed leaving site - WEST QUAY RETAIL HULL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2761 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

would be best if you scanned it all up to ONE multipage PDF

 

 

follow the upload

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

they are killed by a lack of authority

- the managuing agents dont have the authority to sign a contract and that is well known by UKCPS.

 

 

Look up Dr M V UKCPS and M v UKPC and the amongst others.

 

 

I really cant understand why they risk criminal charges for continuing these hopeless claims.

 

 

Probably because CPS are too busy investigating dead people

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are killed by a lack of authority

- the managuing agents dont have the authority to sign a contract and that is well known by UKCPS.

 

Look up Dr M V UKCPS and M v UKPC and the amongst others.

 

I really cant understand why they risk criminal charges for continuing these hopeless claims.

 

Probably because CPS are too busy investigating dead people

 

Hello EB.

How can I proof that about managing agent?

I have searched those cases but could not find anything.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need proof, the managing agent cannot do things in the name of the landowner that only the landowner can do, they simply dont have the authority.

If they use Beavis they are even more stupid than they appear. It is totally irrelevant as it applies to a P&D car park, not a housing development. You have enough point to beat their claim so dont worry about their waffle

Read the parking pranksters bog and web site and look at all of the cases from last year. You will find them with case summaries. You can quote them as long as you get the case number and court details right. Dont worry, most judges are wise to these charades but you have to show you understand your defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...