Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ive locked the old thread post here now. it's how backdoor CCJ's work sadly as he didn't update his 'creditors' he had moved sadly quite legal and to be honest 9/10 nothing can now be done. paying it will NOT resolve the issue a CCJ shows for 6yrs regardless to paid or not or paying or not. you could poss ask whom is refusing his guarantor status for you that if the CCJ is paid, would the issue be resolved, but that will cost you the sum of the judgement. dx  
    • new thread created for this parking CCJ. please only post here now.  
    • So how can the courts then issue a CCJ?! Confirmed by Registry Trust? and issued by CNBC?! 😡  I'll phone again tomorrow and get all the details.
    • dx is wrong there. The reason they did the application with a hearing is likely that they had questions of the application that weren't answered in their wx. nothing to do with your N180 no they are just saying that they want the extension to make it 7.
    • its not a fine! it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3236 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Lousy Service, possible Breach of Contract?

 

I phoned them and asked them if they could repair a tilt and turn window in a rental property They said that they could and quoted three prices (depending on what work needed to be done) which I agreed and furnished my credit card details.

 

An appointment was made for a few days later. On the morning of the appointment the engineer telephoned me and when leaning it is a tilt and turn, said he could not do it.

 

 

I complained to the company and Mr R**** sent me, (to the wrong address), an insulting reply saying they are not charging me and offering 15% discount on future work (as if).

 

I have asked for reasonable compensation and if I do not get it will take them to court. A complete bunch of cowboys.

 

I see that the company have complained to Trust Pilot about my naming one of their employee sin a scathing review. I have therefore removed his name. It is a pity that Able Group have not dealt with the problem rather than their petty attempts to have it removed.

Edited by Andyorch
Company named removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

To be frank, I don't think you have much of a case.

 

You cannot claim for the day you may have had to take off work

They gave you a refund

 

You are now back in the same position you were in before you called them so no loss whatsoever.

 

If you tried to take this to court, I fear you would lose.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

To be frank, I don't think you have much of a case.

 

You cannot claim for the day you may have had to take off work

They gave you a refund

 

You are now back in the same position you were in before you called them so no loss whatsoever.

 

If you tried to take this to court, I fear you would lose.

 

Agree... Dont be unreasonable here. There only responsibility is to refund you should they be unable to complete their work...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot claim for the day you may have had to take off work

They gave you a refund

 

They did not, they did not charge

 

You are now back in the same position you were in before you called them so no loss whatsoever.

 

No I am not. I cancelled all appointments for that morning and it took me several hours on the internet to find a company willing to undertake the work. As a professional landlord, time is money.

 

Please do not reply to posts unless you have fully understood them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree... Dont be unreasonable here. There (sic) only responsibility is to refund you should they be unable to complete their work...

 

I am not sure that that is correct under contract law, a verbal contract was agreed, they breached it, causing me to find another company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot claim for the day you may have had to take off work

They gave you a refund

 

They did not, they did not charge

 

You are now back in the same position you were in before you called them so no loss whatsoever.

 

No I am not. I cancelled all appointments for that morning and it took me several hours on the internet to find a company willing to undertake the work. As a professional landlord, time is money.

 

Please do not reply to posts unless you have fully understood them.

 

Please understand that I am only giving you the same information you would get elsewhere. If you doubt this, call Citizens advice.

You chose to spend that amount of time researching. Nobody forced you to.

 

Agree... Dont be unreasonable here. There (sic) only responsibility is to refund you should they be unable to complete their work...

 

I am not sure that that is correct under contract law, a verbal contract was agreed, they breached it, causing me to find another company.

 

Have you actually read the terms and conditions?

 

Please do not go on the attack if you don't want to hear the opinions of others.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please understand that I am only giving you the same information you would get elsewhere. If you doubt this, call Citizens advice.

You chose to spend that amount of time researching. Nobody forced you to.

 

 

 

Have you actually read the terms and conditions?

 

Please do not go on the attack if you don't want to hear the opinions of others.

 

Fully agree with SF here. While im an advocate for consumer rights, you also have to see it from the company side... They haven't actually done much wrong, aside from their engineer being allocated incorrectly. Their liability to you in this situation is non existent, and I guarantee you that the T&Cs they say they wont be held liable for LOE.

 

an insulting reply saying they are not charging me and offering 15% discount on future work (as if).

 

Well if they didnt charge you then... There is no issue...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please understand that I am only giving you the same information you would get elsewhere. If you doubt this, call Citizens advice.

 

The CAB is the last place anyone should go for advice. Some of the advice they have given to people ticketed by private parking companies is horrendous.

 

You chose to spend that amount of time researching. Nobody forced you to.

 

I did not choose to, it was forced on me by my legal obligation to my tenant under the AST to maintain the property in good order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please understand that I am only giving you the same information you would get elsewhere. If you doubt this, call Citizens advice.

 

The CAB is the last place anyone should go for advice. Some of the advice they have given to people ticketed by private Parking companies is horrendous.

 

You chose to spend that amount of time researching. Nobody forced you to.

 

I did not choose to, it was forced on me by my legal obligation to my tenant under the AST to maintain the property in good order.

 

Fully agree that with an AST it needs to be maintained, and I can see the balance, but... Just rebook it...

Stop going off on one with this that and the other and itll be okay.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please understand that I am only giving you the same information you would get elsewhere. If you doubt this, call Citizens advice.

 

The CAB is the last place anyone should go for advice. Some of the advice they have given to people ticketed by private parking companies is horrendous.

 

You chose to spend that amount of time researching. Nobody forced you to.

 

I did not choose to, it was forced on me by my legal obligation to my tenant under the AST to maintain the property in good order.

 

Which is not the fault or liability of the company.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is not the fault or liability of the company.

 

No-one is saying it is.

 

My thrust is that an agreement was made on a business to business basis and one side failed to perform. Whether a Judge will agree that there is a breach, I do not know, SCCs are always a lottery, but if he/she does then I shall claim liquidated damages for three hours at the court agreed rate of £18 an hour, my travel costs , and court fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

an agreement was made on a business to business basis ...

 

The regulation on B2B is very different to consumer law, you don't have the same protection. This is a consumer help site, if you want to claim damages then go ahead, I'm with the others though, there is no damages to be claimed.

Let us know how the court case goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is not the fault or liability of the company.

 

No-one is saying it is.

 

My thrust is that an agreement was made on a business to business basis and one side failed to perform. Whether a Judge will agree that there is a breach, I do not know, SCCs are always a lottery, but if he/she does then I shall claim liquidated damages for three hours at the court agreed rate of £18 an hour, my travel costs , and court fees.

 

A liquidated damages claim must be supported by a negotiated liquidated damages clause

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A liquidated damages claim must be supported by a negotiated liquidated damages clause

 

Are you sure about that? What about private parking invoices? Have you ever visited peppipoo?

 

1) They are invoices - they may well be "speculative invoices"

2) The PPC's will argue (if they are arguing a contract, not just a license) that it was negotiated : the terms will be displayed and the driver can choose to accept them or not.

The PPC's have failed in the past where the signs weren't clear, precisely because agreement to the term must be inferrable for the charge to stand.

 

How are you going to show the firm agreed those liquidated damages as a term of your contract?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2) The PPC's will argue (if they are arguing a contract, not just a license) that it was negotiated

 

I am unaware of any case where that argument has been deployed. They are usually trounced By UTCCC Regs anyway.

 

This was, if it was a contract, a verbal contract, no T&C, no damages clauses, nothing. Are you saying that no such agreement has any validity? I was damaged by the incompetence of this company, are you saying that that is OK?

 

http://thelawdictionary.org/article/is-a-verbal-agreement-legally-binding/

Link to post
Share on other sites

2) The PPC's will argue (if they are arguing a contract, not just a license) that it was negotiated

 

I am unaware of any case where that argument has been deployed. They are usually trounced By UTCCC Regs anyway.

 

This was, if it was a contract, a verbal contract, no T&C, no damages clauses, nothing. Are you saying that no such agreement has any validity? I was damaged by the incompetence of this company, are you saying that that is OK?

 

http://thelawdictionary.org/article/is-a-verbal-agreement-legally-binding/

 

The basic agreement is valid as the 4 components of a contract are present (offer, acceptance, consideration & intent to create contractual relations).

 

If no T's & C's were agreed, a court would infer what was intended, if there was a dispute.

 

The firm only has to say "no liquidated damages clause was agreed" - and because you yourself also state this, the court will conclude there was a contract but it was a contract without a liquidated damages clause. You can't unilaterally add one in afterwards.

 

Are you sure you are claiming "liquidated damages"? Where the sum is agreed in advance?

 

Or are you claiming non-liquidated ("general") damages for breach of contract, where you could claim for actual losses but the damages would need to be both "reasonably foreseeable", and "flow naturally from the breach".

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

... are you claiming non-liquidated ("general") damages for breach of contract, where you could claim for actual losses but the damages would need to be both "reasonably foreseeable", and "flow naturally from the breach".

 

I am claiming general damages of £40, (but would settle for £20) It is not the money, it is the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lousy Service, possible Breach of Contract?

 

I phoned them and asked them if they could repair a tilt and turn window in a rental property They said that they could and quoted three prices (depending on what work needed to be done) which I agreed and furnished my credit card details.

 

An appointment was made for a few days later. On the morning of the appointment the engineer telephoned me and when leaning it is a tilt and turn, said he could not do it.

 

 

I complained to the company and Mr R**** sent me, (to the wrong address), an insulting reply saying they are not charging me and offering 15% discount on future work (as if).

 

I have asked for reasonable compensation and if I do not get it will take them to court. A complete bunch of cowboys.

 

I see that the company have complained to Trust Pilot about my naming one of their employee sin a scathing review. I have therefore removed his name. It is a pity that Able Group have not dealt with the problem rather than their petty attempts to have it removed.

 

 

You cannot claim for the day you may have had to take off work

They gave you a refund

 

They did not, they did not charge

 

You are now back in the same position you were in before you called them so no loss whatsoever.

 

No I am not. I cancelled all appointments for that morning and it took me several hours on the internet to find a company willing to undertake the work. As a professional landlord, time is money.

 

Please do not reply to posts unless you have fully understood them.

 

Agree... Dont be unreasonable here. There (sic) only responsibility is to refund you should they be unable to complete their work...

 

I am not sure that that is correct under contract law, a verbal contract was agreed, they breached it, causing me to find another company.

 

Please understand that I am only giving you the same information you would get elsewhere. If you doubt this, call Citizens advice.

 

The CAB is the last place anyone should go for advice. Some of the advice they have given to people ticketed by private parking companies is horrendous.

 

You chose to spend that amount of time researching. Nobody forced you to.

 

I did not choose to, it was forced on me by my legal obligation to my tenant under the AST to maintain the property in good order.

 

Which is not the fault or liability of the company.

 

No-one is saying it is.

 

My thrust is that an agreement was made on a business to business basis and one side failed to perform. Whether a Judge will agree that there is a breach, I do not know, SCCs are always a lottery, but if he/she does then I shall claim liquidated damages for three hours at the court agreed rate of £18 an hour, my travel costs , and court fees.

 

A liquidated damages claim must be supported by a negotiated liquidated damages clause

 

Are you sure about that? What about private parking invoices? Have you ever visited peppipoo?

 

2) The PPC's will argue (if they are arguing a contract, not just a license) that it was negotiated

 

I am unaware of any case where that argument has been deployed. They are usually trounced By UTCCC Regs anyway.

 

This was, if it was a contract, a verbal contract, no T&C, no damages clauses, nothing. Are you saying that no such agreement has any validity? I was damaged by the incompetence of this company, are you saying that that is OK?

 

http://thelawdictionary.org/article/is-a-verbal-agreement-legally-binding/

 

I am claiming general damages of £40, (but would settle for £20) It is not the money, it is the game.

 

 

For Reference

 

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5295134

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good heavens. Now we know where the 3 hours researching for another window fixer went. Posting the same thing all over the net.

 

I think you should put that link on MSE as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good heavens. Now we know where the 3 hours researching for another window fixer went. Posting the same thing all over the net.

 

I think you should put that link on MSE as well.

 

Already done :-)

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For reference, Pepipoo has no relevance to your case. You have had two different threads running over two respected websites and both are saying the same thing.

You don't seem to get it so I will back off and unsubscribe to this thread as watching paint dry is far more entertaining.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...