Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice needed on housing benefit interview please


twinmummy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3212 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I understand that's why I'm here, but I always think of the worst case as that way things can only get better I mean if it says I need to go to court, how long does it take?, what if I am on honeymoon and miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You are welcome, just to remind you of this as well, if I mean if the LA do want to take this to Court you MUST seek legal advice IMMEDIATELY the moment you know.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a Court date you MUST NOT fail to attend without good cause or notice to the Court, this regardless if you are on honeymoon, you are obliged to attend, failure to do so could see a bench warrant issued for your arrest for non attendance.

 

 

Again this is advice a Solicitor would tell you this anyway.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are away when it arrives then that is different, you will have ticket receipts and things to prove you were out of the country.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

twinmummy

 

 

I am known on the forums for being brutal and honest with my replies and sometimes, I upset the poster of the thread, it depends if you want the brutal truth or just a fancy acceptable answer it would help if you could answer that..

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is, there is no point in conjecture at this time, putting all this worry on yourself will do you no favours will it? NO!! So take a deep breath and walk away from this for a day or two, just so you can relax a little.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

twinmummy

 

 

I am known on the forums for being brutal and honest with my replies and sometimes, I upset the poster of the thread, it depends if you want the brutal truth or just a fancy acceptable answer it would help if you could answer that..

 

 

Just to add my two pennies worth dare I say it would help matters a tad If you didn't keep posting parts of your comments in bold/upper case, which comes across (to me at least) as shouting and so a wee bit aggressive sometimes. Just taking it a little gentler would help things.

 

People want sensible advise, and not being scared to death at this early stage imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

most people who commit benefit fraud do not go to prison, as this is normally reserved for the most serious cases

 

there are a number of things that could happen

  1. the council may simply ask you to repay the overpayment
  2. the council may apply an official caution - they can only do this if you admit the offence
  3. the council may apply a penalty - you do not have to plead guilty to accept a penalty - this is similar to an additional fine that you have to pay back as well as the overpayment
  4. the council may decide to prosecute - this means they take you to court - there are a wide range of possible sentences that you could receive - the vast majority do not involve prison

 

the best advice that can be offered is to seek professional legal advice from a soliciitor who specialises in social security - nobody here can advise you about how long this matter could take to deal with as it will depend upon complexity of case, caseload at your local Council, caseload at your local courts

 

at this moment in time you need to try not to get yourself upset - i would advise not reading about other cases and their outcomes as each case is individual, you just run the risk of upsetting and worrying yourself

 

we all make mistakes in life - a good thing is that it is better that you came clean now, rather than in another 4 or 5 years, when the amount you owe might have doubled

  • Confused 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add my two pennies worth dare I say it would help matters a tad If you didn't keep posting parts of your comments in bold/upper case, which comes across (to me at least) as shouting and so a wee bit aggressive sometimes. Just taking it a little gentler would help things.

 

People want sensible advise, and not being scared to death at this early stage imo.

 

 

Not shouting in the least. It is making the point that posters time and again forget that they don't always see what is clearly being said, it is used to draw attention to a point of fact or to show clearly what is being said.

 

 

Often repeating over several posts and still not being understood. But when in bold your eyes are drawn to these "words" and then it is understood. These are keywords for the poster, it is used often in many documents for this reason. Also it allows them to see the "word" clearer. Also CAG has key words that automatically link to the library or other things like quotes, so it is not necessarily me but the system as in the post above if you hover over it or click it you will see its actually a link with further information relevant to that word. Just pointing out the obvious if you hadn't noticed by the way?

 

 

I have all the time in the world so to speak for posters on any forum. But sometimes as stated it takes a bit more for the point to be taken. BTW no offence taken.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the complaint is that Mikeymack is bolding the word "overpayment", that's not something he has any control over. The forum software automatically makes that word into a link and bolds it by default - there's nothing an individual poster can do to prevent it. The same is true of a number of other words, such as "contribution".

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

most people who commit benefit fraud do not go to prison, as this is normally reserved for the most serious cases

 

there are a number of things that could happen

  1. the council may simply ask you to repay the overpayment
  2. the council may apply an official caution - they can only do this if you admit the offence
  3. the council may apply a penalty - you do not have to plead guilty to accept a penalty - this is similar to an additional fine that you have to pay back as well as the overpayment
  4. the council may decide to prosecute - this means they take you to court - there are a wide range of possible sentences that you could receive - the vast majority do not involve prison

 

the best advice that can be offered is to seek professional legal advice from a soliciitor who specialises in social security - nobody here can advise you about how long this matter could take to deal with as it will depend upon complexity of case, caseload at your local Council, caseload at your local courts

 

at this moment in time you need to try not to get yourself upset - i would advise not reading about other cases and their outcomes as each case is individual, you just run the risk of upsetting and worrying yourself

 

we all make mistakes in life - a good thing is that it is better that you came clean now, rather than in another 4 or 5 years, when the amount you owe might have doubled

 

Wish i read this last night i may have slept a bit will let you all know the outcome as may help someone else in a similar situation

thanks you all really has helped not feel so alone and believe me i will be double cheaking everything in future

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the complaint is that Mikeymack is bolding the word "overpayment", that's not something he has any control over. The forum software automatically makes that word into a link and bolds it by default - there's nothing an individual poster can do to prevent it. The same is true of a number of other words, such as "contribution".

 

 

No It's not that. I suggest you go back and read his previous posts to see what I mean.

 

*eta* I think he's adjusted that now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No It's not that. I suggest you go back and read his previous posts to see what I mean.

 

*eta* I think he's adjusted that now.

 

Hi Sadone

 

I understand what you mean from looking back at posts 9, 15, 27 & 29, I think mikeymack was just trying to place emphasis on some words as most people do when talking to people face to face, but can be lost in online or written communications.

 

Different people use different methods to place emphasis.

 

It is normal convention online that the use of capitals indicates shouting and I generally perceive use of uppercase as shouting/aggressive, so I fully understand where you are coming from, but I honestly do not think that was mikeymack's intention.

 

Personally, I find underlining or use of bold to be less aggressive than uppercase.

 

But I think it is important that we try to keep the thread on track.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish i read this last night i may have slept a bit will let you all know the outcome as may help someone else in a similar situation

thanks you all really has helped not feel so alone and believe me i will be double cheaking everything in future

 

I know it is difficult playing the waiting game, but you need to just do your best to allow life to go on, and focus on the things you need to.

 

There is no point in worrying about what has happened, as that will not change what has already happened

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

im trying to start a new post but cant work out how what im asking is im still awaiting a response from this benefit fraud investigation, i was told if i get a date and its on my wedding day /honeymoon i have to cancell the day/honeymoon

would wedding insurance cover something like that as allt he sites i have asked are very vague with no straight answers :( :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. If you're writing about the same problem, it's better not to start a new thread and to keep the information together for the people advising you.

 

For info though, if you scroll up to the top of this page, just above the name of the forum on the left, there is a blue box that says + Post New Thread in white.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...