Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice needed on housing benefit interview please


twinmummy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3212 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok sorry to hear of this mess, when you had your IUC did you get any paperwork handed to you? There are things that need to be done in a specific order see here http://www.advicenow.org.uk/advicenow-guides/problems-with-benefits/how-to-handle-an-interview-under-caution/interview-under-caution-useful-contacts-html,665,FP.html

 

 

Have a read in "in this section" and see if there were any irregularities! Your first mistake was not informing them as soon as possible, your second was sending information by "standard" post they always lose this in some shape or form, the right way to do this is to take the information to the Council and go to reception and have it scanned in to their systems and a receipt issued to you.

 

 

If you had followed this then you could show you did in fact supply the required information when requested. I know better late than never.

 

 

£3k seems a lot of overpayment have you got the dates for which this applies to you/your partner? All overpayments that are the fault of the claimant can be recovered, different rules apply for the agencies fault for this.

 

 

As far as the arrangement you now have with your LA for recovery does this include any civil penalty for the error?

Has the LA agreed with you in writing that you should not appeal this case?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry is this my thread im new to this and find it a bit confusing if its not please delete all this!

 

basically i have been renting off my dad and when i filled out for HB i lied.. stupid and i deeply regret this now i was so sure my new business wold take off and i would be paying my own way but 4 years later it never did, they had me down for 17k underpayment for my dads rent but i did alot of maintence in the house as my dad lives abroad needless to say i took advantage of the fact i was renting from family

also i was done for benefit fraud 8 years ago ( a complete lie but they won my appeal and i paid it all back)

also after my IUC i realised i hadnt told anyone i was getting maintence but i have told then now

basically am i looking at jail ? i have sent a letter to the council expressing my genuine regret and made it clear i was to pay back every single penny asap

my dad is furious with me, the council think the tennancy is fake and its not and if my family didnt live abraod i would have been kicked out before now

my fiance has since moved in and taken all finacial responsibilities

i am sick with worry

Link to post
Share on other sites

a few questions to improve understanding of your situation

 

when was your IUC?

did you take a solicitor with you?

 

when did you receive the letter stating that the Council had decided you were not entitled to HB and had been overpaid?

 

what reason did the Council give for you not being entitled to HB?

 

have you appealed against the decision?

if so, what stage is the appeal at?

 

has the Council told you that they intend to prosecute?

 

when you were previously done for benefit fraud, was it HB or a different benefit?

were you prosecuted, cautioned or offered a penalty on the previous occasion?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all since you knew what you were doing please see this link and read up on what could happen to you then pop back for further advice see here

 

 

http://www.scoop.it/t/lacef-news by reading some of the stories on benefit fraud this will give you an idea of what to expect further advice will be posted shortly with some more links for you to read up on ok

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

ICU was the other day i went with a friend

letter just said they think a offence has occured and to attend a cautioned interview

at the interview the main aspect was i lied on my HB form that i wasnt related to the landlord and that from my bank to dads showed 17k less than they paid me in HB

in a flood of tears i admitted that i was related and knowing lied

all i no is that theres a back log of cases and i could be waiting sometime to find out what happens next

i have visions of my wedding day in a few months being called off

i believe the last ICU was income support not HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's good news.

 

 

You can type in benefit fraud in to your search engine and the read up on what you can expect, can you state how long this has been going on and has the Council given their findings yet?

 

 

If you cannot open links type this into your search engine Loss of benefit as a penalty for benefit fraud

The link you want to read up on is the one from the .gov site dated the 29/01/2015

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i really appreciate being able to talk to someone

all i know is theres a backlog of cases and i could wait sometime

i have done several googles and its all so contradicting theres alot of suspended sentances and alot of just repayments yet nothings like my case some people have had a jail sentance for 12k and some just have to pay back and that 70k

i understand each council is diffrent i cant eat or function properly im such a fool

Link to post
Share on other sites

Realising you have done wrong is the first step, stopping benefit fraud is the 2nd, the wait for the decision whether or not to prosecute you is the 3rd. This is as you know agonisingly long. You may or may not get taken to Court, things running against you are the fact there has been a previous case against you.

 

 

Type this in to your search bar loss of benefit as a penalty for benefit fraud the one you want is 27/03/2013 read sections one and two.

 

 

A word of warning to you and your poor choices regarding benefits, it is this

Since the rules changed after the 01/04/2015 the penalties are much more severe ok?

 

 

From 2002 to 2010 the rules were different see here

 

 

3. Background

For benefit fraud wholly committed on or after 1 April 2002, the rules allowed for the removal or reduction of benefit for 13 weeks if a claimant, their partner or a family member had been convicted of a second benefit fraud offence.

 

From 1 April 2010, these rules were strengthened to enable a reduction or removal of benefit for 4 weeks in certain cases of fraud by a claimant, their partner or a family member. The new rules applied if:

 

  • they had been convicted, or had accepted a caution or an administrative penalty, for a first (or non-linking) benefit fraud offence, and
  • the fraud was committed wholly on or after 1 April 2010

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be difficult to say due to all of the new rules and each case is different. It may be you only receive a penalty and repay the debt instead of going to Court, the decision is for the LA to make. Overpayment is recoverable because it was from the start, if you had notified the LA that the LL was a relative they may not have awarded benefits, but if you had they still may have awarded them to you.

 

 

For future reference it pays to ask about the rules in advance so you will not fall into this type of trap, as you have done with your fiancé.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My fiance and dad didn't realise and he only moved in at weekend

I genuinely thought my business would make me self sufficient I thank you for your help desperate to make it right

Link to post
Share on other sites

All you can do now is wait for the LA to let you know what their intentions are going to be. Until then you really should try to stop worrying its too late to change this, but now you know the rules PLEASE be very careful in the future with your benefits and what you declare to them.

 

 

A side note the truth will set you free ( an attempt to make you understand and be truthful in the future ok?)

 

 

A second warning for you as well, in the future please remember your partner could also get into trouble as well if they know/knew about the fraud ok. BTW was there any other benefit you have claimed subject to any investigation yet?

 

 

I have dug out a quote from the .gov site for you its as follows

 

 

Housing benefit

 

Part 75 Overpayments of housing benefit

 

(1) Except where regulations otherwise provide, any amount of housing benefit paid in excess of entitlement may be recovered in such manner as may be prescribed either by the Secretary of State or by the authority which paid the benefit.

 

(2) Regulations may require such an authority to recover such an amount in such circumstances as may be prescribed.

 

(3) An amount recoverable under this section is in all cases recoverable from the person to whom it was paid; but, in such circumstances as may be prescribed, it may also be recovered from such other person as may be prescribed.

 

(4) Any amount recoverable under this section may, without prejudice to any other method of recovery, be recovered by deduction from prescribed benefits.

 

 

 

 

Partial quote above is from here http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/5/part/III/enacted

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I no this is not a reply to this thread but I could really do with some advice. I have been called for a interview under caution on Friday I am literally getting over a mental breakdown I started a job and did not tell hb because of on going mental problems I can only concentrate on one thing at a time. I am also emphysema sufferer I do get pip. Please help I am at my wits end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advise i have stopped all my benefit as my fiance is working we have had to claim wtc but theres a new claim started for the 10th of may (when he moved in )

as soon as i have his wage details

i never want to claim anything where i can forget or miss anything its going to be hard but me and my fiance are going to pay back everything im not entitled to and not claim any HB or CTB

i have been told that i should hear before my wedding im just deverstated if i get sentanced and cant get married

you advise is/has been appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

twinmummy We know this will be hard for you, especially so close to your wedding and all that. you really should try to stop getting so upset, you cannot do anything now its out of your hands ok!

 

 

Secondly if you wish or are entitled to claim any form of top up please use the correct procedure and use the benefit advisor, complete the details required and then see what it throws up for you, then if it recommends claiming, then apply for that in the right manner.

 

 

A change of circumstances should always be notified to the agency dealing with that benefit, as soon as it could change the amount of money you are entitled to claim, this way you will be doing things the right way. Even if you are not sure declare it anyway....

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree and everything's felt with now I just want to know if I'm going to prison as need to sort my babies out I'm so grateful to be able to discuss this and one thing for sure I will always seek advise like you said

Link to post
Share on other sites

twinmummy You have to remember if you were to see a Court case against you this will be some time in the future, and a sentence could include a custodial sentence, But this could be a suspended sentence with a monetary penalty as well, or a community based sentence, it really does depend on the outcome for what your LA will decide to do.

 

 

This is something that is truthful and accurate, I would not be giving the best advice if I did not tell you this as well.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...