Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Informing DWP of changes - when?


Nystagmite
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Really pleased for you Nystagmite, and keeping my fingers crossed for Rae as well.

 

 

was just ESA50, or other evidence also?

 

congrats btw.

 

Can depend worried. I got Supprt Group from ESA form with no evidence sent in. Having said that have never had an IB medical either. Can depend on the condition , whether it all ties in as a typical progressive outlook for condition based on info they have on file for you already etc.

 

And a good measure of 'pot luck' on who first looks at your form, as some people put into Support Group have been moved a year later onto WRAG or as fit to work. Lottery process really.

 

Making sure you don't overload the form with info not relevant to descriptors is important as well, I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. It was other evidence too.

 

Can I please ask what kind of evidence you have sent if it is not trouble

I have sent my esa50 (trans.from I.B) on 19th 09 12 with lots of hospital appt. doctor reports etc. still waiting to hear

waiting is more stress more me it has lots of effect on my health. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really pleased for you Nystagmite, and keeping my fingers crossed for Rae as well.

 

 

 

 

Can depend worried. I got Supprt Group from ESA form with no evidence sent in. Having said that have never had an IB medical either. Can depend on the condition , whether it all ties in as a typical progressive outlook for condition based on info they have on file for you already etc.

 

And a good measure of 'pot luck' on who first looks at your form, as some people put into Support Group have been moved a year later onto WRAG or as fit to work. Lottery process really.

 

Making sure you don't overload the form with info not relevant to descriptors is important as well, I think.

 

indeed, if they used what on my ESA50 alone I would also be in SG, so cleaerly the person processing your form was more leniant than the one who processed mine. I am somewhat surprised someone can get into SG with an ESA50 alone, as whats stopping people outright lieing just using an ESA50? I suspect your ATOS centre was massively overwhelmed and they had to cut corners.

 

I even had ATOS tell the DPW SG and I got put in WRAG.

 

The DM told me they used my much older DLA medical report on walking distance over the ESA report. They didnt give me a reason why they ignored the 2nd SG descriptor I met.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My GP was contacted, which may have made some difference. I know with DLA, they have a decision makers guide, which has a list of medical conditions and the expected needs arising from them. I won't be surprised if they used something similar for ESA. Yet, as many will tell you, we don't fit into neat little boxes when it comes to disability. Especially for those of us with multiple disabilities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://labourlist.org/2013/01/esasos-the-government-are-sneaking-through-major-changes-to-how-disabled-people-are-assessed/

 

:mad2:

 

So, we now have imaginary guide dogs. Now, I do not know the process of getting a guide dog or how easy it is to obtain one. But is it reasonable for them to assume you can use a guide dog? Bearing in mind there are checks they have to do; such as if you've got other pets. (you can have a guide dog if you've got other pets; but it depends how the animals are together) And then there's the training you have to do. Some people may have medical conditions which make using a guide dog unsuitable.

 

If you're just mentally impaired, you can't use physical descriptors and vice versa. Where does this leave people with things like Autism? It's developmental and many of us are affected physically and mentally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

reading the article it unfortunately leaves people like yourself, exactly where the govt wants you to be, unsupported, no money, no income, no job, no hope, no life, but hey, at least us 'benefit scrounging sc{}m' are being 'put in our place' where the 'strivers' no longer have to pay through the nose in order to keep us in the manner to which we have become accustomed..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This hasn't happened yet; but have known for a while what my parents plans are.

 

Basically, my parents are paying off their mortgage on their house and when they've finished doing that, they want to transfer the house so that it's in the name of me and my two siblings. They said they can't see my brother moving out. I will and I know my sister will.

 

I currently receive income based ESA. I know that if you have property or savings worth over £16k, you can't claim income based benefits.

 

Where do I stand when it comes to properties where more than one person owns it? Neither are likely (at least for a while) to be able to afford to buy me out.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you live in the property then there will be no effect on your benefit but once you move out you need to declare that you have an interest in te property and would either be expected to have an income or capital. This could be disregarded for a period of 26 weeks whilst you decide what to do with regards to realising your share of the capital from the property.

You could be treated as being in receipt of 1/3 of the value of the property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

however if the property is occupied by a relative who is either a pensioner or disabled, the value of the property is disregarded

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any more information on this please? Brother is disabled.

 

 

The Employment and Support Allowance Regulations 2008

 

SCHEDULE 9

CAPITAL TO BE DISREGARDED

 

4. Any premises occupied in whole or in part by—

(a)a partner or relative of a single claimant or any member of the family as the home where that person is aged 60 or over or is incapacitated;

(b)the former partner of a claimant as the home; but this provision is not to apply where the former partner is a person from whom the claimant is estranged or divorced or with whom the person formed a civil partnership that has been dissolved.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/794/schedule/9/made

 

This is the original ESA legislation, I suspect the reference to age 60 will have been amended since to reflect the increase in qualifying age for pension credit, but can't locate the updated version

  • Haha 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

What is the procedure (what to do?) if you have a sickness note for a month whilst on JSA please? Or for three months?

 

Are sick notes still in existence under the new system please?

 

It is coming up to Christmas so I don't really want to rock the boat right now and I don't feel very well any way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything over 2 weeks you need to change your claim to ESA

 

Thought as much. Thinking of the procedure and if a delay is likely to occur. Not ideal just before Christmas.

 

I assume that the sickness certificate is sent to DWP. But is there a new claim form needed to be completed? Who needs to be advised? Housing Benefit etc?

 

I have forgotten the old system and I wonder if anything has changed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I am finally moving. I pick my keys up on Frday. We're going to start moving stuff in on Friday and are having stuff delivered the following week.

 

So, as far as DWP are concerned, when am I actually classed as having had moved? IE, when do I have to tell them my new address and my entitlement to SDP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When do you start having to pay rent ?

 

Most likely, they will consider you having moved the day you take up residence which may be a week or two after you have started paying rent (assuming this is rented).

 

personally, I'd go from the date stated on the tenancy agreement. As to when to inform the DWP, it makes sense to do so as soon as possible, certainly within weeks.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...