Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Informing DWP of changes - when?


Nystagmite
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Nystagmite:

 

:rant:Sheer ignorance of some general practioners about DWATO, specially blue ones as mine is, beggars belief! None of which helps you.

 

Sorry, but if your doctor won't support your claim with a Med 3, it's find a different practice or back to jobseekers. Waste of time completing the ESA50. Not meaning to sound harsh but that's the reality unless anyone's got any better ideas.

 

Think Jobcentre have to pay you jobseekers, assuming you keep the agreement, if your doctor, or Atos, say fit for work. Praps Antone or Flumps will know for sure.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :hug:

 

I think if he fills in the ESA50 the WCA will still go ahead, but his payments will stop in the mean time when his current cert runs out.

 

I assume then if he passes the WCA for now his GP situation wont affect the benefit. Of course its possible a processing of the ESA50 and medical could take many weeks which wouldnt be practical without sick notes.

 

I also suggest to change GP, assuming you know yourself that you not well enough to work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks. He knows I'm ill and it's extremely unlikely I'm going to find a job which fits my requirements.

 

There is no way I can take part in the work programme and he knows there's no alternative - I have to take part. I can't.

 

He claims it's because he doesn't want me to spending my life on benefits. Where have I ever said that's going to happen? I just need a few months off to sort myself out.

 

That GP does not even make sense as surely you would go onto JSA or ESA and both are benefits? and there is nothing to stop you looking for work whilst on ESA just without the added stressors of the Work Programme (at least whilst you are on assessment anyway). And how can an ESA50 apply if you have to go back on to JSA because you have no access to sick notes....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts exactly, Slatted. The GP's stance just doesn't make sense to me. But then I am a simple person! So the GP acknowledges his/her patient is unfit for work but won't provide the necessary written confirmation. Doesn't the GP know that a) that is not his/her patients best interest and b) even in the Support group of ESA you are quite entitled to look for work that you feel able to do.

I'm so sorry you're having such problems Nystagmite ...:grouphug:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ESA is for anybody sick for over 2 weeks as anything over 2 weeks means you are intelligible for JSA. There is no maximum nor is there a minimum term. ESA claim will have to be withdrawn and a claim for JSA made.

 

So.....

 

I'd explain all this to the RNIB, Council and whoever else you can think of to get a lot of pressure applied to the work program provider.

 

You know my musings on this already.

 

Did your GP not even put extra conditions/adaptations for a return on your fit note?

 

If not I would maybe suggest getting the practice manager involved and explain the situation and how without the adaptations you will suffer and deteriorate. Remember if/when you go back to work you will need exactly the same adaptations that also apply now to the Work Program.

 

As for GPs it's like banging your head against a brick wall at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But, well, if a GP signs a Med 3 as "may be fit subject to the following adjustments" the ESA department will accept that as a med cert stating the claimant is unfit for work. This is on the basis that technically you don't need to be completely incapable of working to claim ESA, you just need to have LCW - Limited Capability for Work.

 

I restate: if a GP issues you a Med 3, this is fine for ESA purposes as long as it states your incapacity, gives an end date (unless you have already been on ESA for six months, which I know Nystagmite has not) and is signed and stamped.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. The fit note states my disabilities, adjustments needed to be made and the date as ongoing. I have been informed by an Audiologist that my hearing may return to normal; but he doesn't know when or if this will happen. (whereas everything else won't)

 

On the first note note, the date was July 2nd and I was signed off for a month. The second note is dated 25/7. Is that a problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. The fit note states my disabilities, adjustments needed to be made and the date as ongoing. I have been informed by an Audiologist that my hearing may return to normal; but he doesn't know when or if this will happen. (whereas everything else won't)

 

On the first note note, the date was July 2nd and I was signed off for a month. The second note is dated 25/7. Is that a problem?

 

The only concern I have here is that a cert marked as "UFN" (Until Further Notice, or ongoing) may not be accepted at this stage of your claim. The rules used to be that UFN certs could not be accepted until a claimant had provided six months worth of dated certs. This could have changed, though, as it was a guidance/procedural thing and not actually stated in the legislation.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite:

 

An extra thought;

 

Seem to remember you're in a support group. Is there a leader/organiser who could advocate your case for adjustments should you find yourself back on jobseekers for any reason?

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite:

 

:oops: Completely missed the bit about reasonable adjustments. Sorry. Glad I suggested others may know more about it.

 

Assuming tomorrow goes alright, good luck with the ESA50.

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

 

Ah, these things happen. You are correct when you state that a failure of the WCA has to be accepted as prima facie evidence of capability for work for JSA purposes. The problems tend to arise because many people kicked off ESA aren't able to agree to the Jobseekers Agreements they are required to sign when claiming JSA because of their health condition. This is a systemic failure, of course, but one that needs to be considered.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On the first note note, the date was July 2nd and I was signed off for a month. The second note is dated 25/7. Is that a problem?

 

Meant to note, although it's not directly relevant to your case, that overlapping certs are not a problem. A cert signed 02/07/2012 for one calendar month will be accepted as valid until 01/08/2012. If you subsequently present a cert signed 25/07/2012 then all that happens is that the end date of the new cert will take precedence.

 

On the other hand, a gap in certs can cause problems. This is one of those areas where I could elaborate, but won't unless someone really wants me to as it could be tedious.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite:

 

An extra thought;

 

Seem to remember you're in a support group. Is there a leader/organiser who could advocate your case for adjustments should you find yourself back on jobseekers for any reason?

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

 

Thanks. This has been brought up. I've not heard from the branch manager yet as to whether she did contact my adviser. Thanks for the reminder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope it works out ok for you Nystagmite that is good news your cert will be valid and just date been the issue.

 

Indeed. And thanks for the clarification, antone, it was quite interesting ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nysty as we discussed in another thread you are going to have to put your GP to one side and start putting your own support services in place. Make this your one and only goal in life as it will make things far less stressful.

 

The G in GP stands for general. So for specialist tailored support you can't really expect them to know what is available. All you can do is find it yourself and if you need a GPs help in a referral to it, convince them. Helping yourself in this way should also tell them that this problem is that serious for you and your health that they have to help.

 

I have engaged my own welfare rights service, charities and am now paying for my own counseling as my GP is absolutely hopeless. I have also found out there are a lot more things he can and should have done for me. I am just preparing to leave for a new practice as this one since it reorganised in 2010 has consistently failed me.

 

Your GP does not sound too bad. I just think when they are out of their depth you have to educate them to get the best out of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. If it makes any difference, this particular GP is a trainee.

 

Spoke to someone at the job centre this morning who wasn't sure, neither was the person she spoke to. Phoned ESA and they said that my fit note is acceptable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it makes any difference, this particular GP is a trainee.

 

I wonder? Talk to people, then if you have to, get your practice manager involved. Trust me demonstrating your needs backed up by evidence from other people and organisations can bring a pretty big change in how you are treated. It also has a bonus effect in your own understanding so you can play with things that might help.

 

It has taken me a bit of effort to get what I have in place and I am currently having to train my new counselor. She thought I was joking when I said I would like to learn how to do a handstand today. I even offered to buy her an ice cream too! Freud would have seriously investigated it and everybody knows he would never turn down a free ice cream.

 

All the stuff I have got in place will not fix me! It does allow me a bit of space from benefits, housing and my brain issues. Once you have the basics in place you can then go looking for more specialist support. It exists and the people handling your basics are the folks who will have a good idea of what is available beyond them. It also gives me the confidence to make big decisions and fight for the support/treatment I currently really need to have.

 

I know more about my issues and what treatment I need than my GP. It is not hard tbf. He has been an absolute disaster for me since my excellent nice lady doctor left. As soon as I figure out how it may effect my current referral I'm binning him as I think I've found somebody in a better position to help me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I received my DLA award last week. It mentioned something about communication (I said on DLA & ESA forms I have trouble) and something about needing help in unfamiliar places. Can I use my DLA award as evidence for ESA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my DLA award last week. It mentioned something about communication (I said on DLA & ESA forms I have trouble) and something about needing help in unfamiliar places. Can I use my DLA award as evidence for ESA?

 

Highly unlikely that they will be interested in what the DLA report said. However, should you fail the ESA assessment, the DWP will and do use the ESA report to review your DLA entitlement

 

Simply put, no you can't use evidence for one benefit with another, but the DWP can if it means a possibility of being able to reduce the amount they pay you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer, to my mind, is yes. Of course. It is evidence of your disability or illnesses. I certainly intend to include details of my DLA award in the bumpf of evidence I'll be submitting to the DWP for ESA. It is true that the criteria of the benefits are different but all evidence that supports or highlights your illness and disability in any way helps form an overall picture for the DWP Decision Maker.

Any other evidence you can think of also has some merit. I have copies of a letter written by a consultant at Charing Cross Hospital. What I was seeing him for has absolutely nothing to do with my illness or ESA. However, he did note and comment on my physical state when writing to my GP. These side comments help to support my assertation of physical debilitation so it goes in the mix!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...