Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord's advice needed


wannagethelp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone advise me please, I'm a landlord and have had a tenant living in my property for over 6 years, only a small deposit given and I didn't put into a protected thing, I now need to get the property back and the tenant says I need to evict them as they want a council property, what can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems you are aware that the deposit must be protected before you issue a Section 21.

 

So your choice is to protect the deposit or to return it prior to issuing the notice.

 

Whatever you do, the tenant could take you to court for failure to protect the deposit, so you just need to keep on their good side!

 

I'm not sure about the ethics of a tenant asking to be evicted - technically they are making themselves intentially homeless so as to jump the housing queue in front of someone perhaps more deserving. If the council have your details they may contact you to ask you why you are evicting (my partner received a call when we had to evict a tenant) and you will need to lie if you want to support their story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS. It's time money and effort to evict someone, as well as an issue about your personal reputation. The tenants who moved in after the previous tenant was evicted were a little bit wary because they only heard from the neighbours how nice she was (she flirted with them) and how mean the landlord was - are you really sure you want to be involved?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for the reply, it was helpful but now I'm stuck between evicting and lying to the council because yes, she does want a council property but do I wait until she has ran up rent arrears (which is going to happen as they are now charging her bedroom tax and landed her with a huge 3k bill as she hasn't been paying it), they have cut her rent benefits so I will lose out anyway as I won't even be getting the extremely low, full rent payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on a minute, bedroom tax does not apply to private rental agreements; the council will only pay what the claimant is entitled to, irrespective of the size of property!

So if there has been an overpayment it has nothing to do with how many bedrooms it has.

I would suggest you do nothing at the mo. and evict if she falls behind with rent, and return deposit when you issue a section 8, and hope she does not sue for non-protection of deposit.

That way it is all down to tenant.

You could get further advice on the landlordzone web site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies, I call it bedroom tax but in fact her eldest has left home so benefits have been cut, so in fact she is not entitled to the full rent payments she has been getting since the eldest left home, so hence the debt. Does anyone know how long I will have to wait for her to fall behind with the rent, as the reduction I will get is only a percentage of the rent I ask, so I'm not sure this will be a long drawn out matter as I've been told I have to wait until she is in 8 weeks arrears, which would take months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would

 

return the deposit "in order to help her financial position"

issue section 21

at end of notice, inform the tenant that if she does not leave by the end of the notice that you will be forced to seek a possession order which will create costs of which you will recover

 

Recover costs via small claims.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also inform her that if she is evicted due to rent arrears, she will be very very unlikely to get a place provided by social housing.

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have twice used apps written by this company to create a Section 21:

 

http://www.nationalpropertygroup.co.uk/SECTION21CALCULATOR.asp

 

It is free. Having used it I now get about 1 email a month which is usually interesting and relevant to small-time landlords (I don't have any other links with the company).

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to use form S21 4a to end a periodic tenancy, make sure you give the correct notice and get the dates right, but you must first return any deposit for it to be valid.

And then hope she does not sue you for non-protection!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What precise date in Sep 14 did T commence?

As there was an initial fixed term, you can serve simple s21b during periodic T, after repaying deposit) to expire 2 cal month later

Personally I would serve s8, citing g10 & 11 now. Repay deposit (less rent owing with T agreement), then serve & proceed with s21 later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but if there was an initial fixed T, then simple s21, akin to s21 b, can be used, to expire exactly 2 cal months later, even if mid tenancy period. No expiry date required. (Court of Appeal decision 2013/14). So in fact now 3 s21s - s21a, s21b, and basic s21.

The ruling was supposed to help LLs avoid simple mistakes wih 21b expiry dates and have it declared invalid & thrown out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also inform her that if she is evicted due to rent arrears, she will be very very unlikely to get a place provided by social housing.

 

 

This is very true.

 

Recently a friends daughter who lived in a Private rented property, had over a period of time, stopped paying her top up rent. (as her HB didn't cover it all)

 

So eventually the LL got fed up chasing for the rent arrears & served her with section 21.

 

Friends daughter went to Council housing & fully expected them to rehouse her & her 3 children.

 

Council refused her application on the grounds that she intentionally made herself homeless by running up rent arrears.

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 6 months later...

Can anyone advise, I have an ongoing legal matter, was sent an 'offer' letter by the other party solicitor, which my solicitor accepted, costs being at legal aid rate as stated in the letter, now they have withdrawn it, saying costs are at the standard rate (an extra approx £4,500), is this legal or ethical even?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a landlord going through an eviction with a tenant that has had legal aid as on benefits, to cut a long story short, I made errors in the initial section 21 and so would prefer to pay now instead of further legal fees at court, which I probably will get due to the mess up with the documentation,

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the question is why would they switch their offer from Legal Aid rate to Standard rate costs...even though your Solicitor accepted the first offer,as your Solicitor questioned them why this action/withdrawal has been taken?

 

Legal Aid cuts ?

 

I assume the above was all by way of letter?

 

Solicitors talk to each other.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...