Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP Compliance interview *Update*


Liyanne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

My sister attended her interview today with he DWP compliance officer. They wanted to see her because she negligently failed to inform them of her savings when she claimed benefits. I honestly think she's losing her mind because she keeps forgetting things and lands herself in trouble. She has zero understanding of the benefit rules (I'm no expert) and never knew how much savings or capital one is allowed to have before qualifying for benefits. She has worked her whole life apart from this 16 months.

 

Anyway, the DWP want full bank statements during the period she was on benefits, theres's definitely been an overpayment. She claimed for around 16 months.

 

She's now told me she will refuse to bring bank statements and will voluntarily offer to repay all the benefits she's received. Is this even possible ?

 

She is now working and just wants to get on with life. She's worried they will take her to court so she just want to repay everything rather than stress.

 

What do you guys think? Can she just offer to repay everything to make the DWP go away? She doesn't know the full amount but given her high rent , income support etc, I'm assuming it's around £17K.

 

The whole family is stressing about this as we are worried about her wellbeing. Many thanks for any imput.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She should provide the statements - the DWP and LA have to do a calculation to work out the diminishing capital - what this is is where they virtually calculate how much the capital would have been reduced if she had to live on it and wasn't receiving the benefit.

 

What level ( roughly ) is her savings at? If it's anywhere near the £6000-£16000 mark, then the above calculation can make a big difference (by thousands) to the overpayment. She can then repay the correct amount of overpayment.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want the DWP to go away quickly then play ball with them - ie, provide the statements. If you want things to drag out, let DWP get the statements themselves - which they can and will do, but this can take a longer time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for responding, much appreciated.

 

I think her savings could possibly be about £8k. Is it normal practice for DWP to look into previous claimants who are no longer on benefits ? I can't help but worry she will be taken to court if she does not comply with requests. The sad thing is, she is convinced DWP will just close the case if she gives them a cheque covering the amount of all benefits she's ever received. She has already applied for a bank loan to cover this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If her savings were (as an example) £8,000 for the entire period in question, then the overpayment would not amount to £17,000. The DWP (and L.A.) disregard the first £6,000 and then deduct £1 for every £250 above this - The overpayment would be £8 per week in the above example.

 

Provide the DWP with the information they request and allow them to do the calculations. While they are number crunching, contact the Local council (HB & CT departments) and advise that there has been an oversight regarding the savings and provide them with the same information that has been given to the DWP. The L.A. will use the same calculations as the DWP.

 

Until both sides have done their calculations, it seems foolish to take out a massive loan to repay an overpayment that in all probability is no where as large as your sister thinks. Plunging herself in to debt for what could be a (relatively) minor amount only stores up bigger problems in the future.

 

It is unlikely that the DWP will commence criminal proceedings as a result of a compliance interview. However, the L.A. may go down that route if they find out via the DWP.

 

 

In the meantime, If she is forgetting things and you suspect the problem may be getting worse, get her to go to the doctors - It could be early signs of any number of degenerative conditions, many of which can be managed if diagnosed early enough.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If her savings are around £8000, then it's highly unlikely she'd have an O/P large enough to bother with prosecution, and if she was getting full income support then her HB won't be affected at all. So the actual overpayment once statements are provided will be less than £1000.

 

DWP are in fact far more likely to prosecute someone with a larger overpayment who does not co-operate, than someone with a small overpayment who co-operates fully - so by providing her bankstatements she greatly reduces the chance of prosecution, because she will be reducing the potential overpayment by providing the correct information. Not providing would suggest to the DWP that she has something to hide.

 

Also, repaying a large overpayment has no impact on whether or not a prosecution takes place.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the very useful advice. My sister is no longer on benefits so I hope things get sorted soon. She suffers from depression and I'm thinking of contacting MIND for

 

Is it true that DWP are more lenient on overpayments relating to previous claims rather than those that are flagged up whilst the claimant is still on benefits ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

(back of fag packet calculation) Assume 64 weeks of claiming. With £8,000 savings resulting in an overpayment of £8 per week. Total overpayment for the 16 month period = £512

 

Would the DWP launch a prosecution for such a trivial amount - Highly unlikely as the costs alone would outweigh any benefit and they have many more higher value cases to pursue.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course if the sister refuses to give the statements, the FULL benefit for each week would become an overpayment, resulting in total O/P of thousands, and a much higher chance of prosecution.

 

and no, previous claims, repaying thousands, NONE of this affects the likelihood of prosecution - the biggest factors are the amount of overpayment, and the amount of co-operation - which is why it's very important she provides statements.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a compliance officer visit as I had too must savings about 10K for a 6 month period. I played ball with them and supplied everything they wanted (EG bank statements) I was expecting an overpayment but not had contact from them since supplying the info, and that was over 2 1/2 years ago. So from personal experience let them have bank statements (if they want them that can get them anyway)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Will definitely advise her. It's quite sad that her mental health is deteriorating at such a young age and I have to keep telling her what's best given the situation she's in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Will definitely advise her. It's quite sad that her mental health is deteriorating at such a young age and I have to keep telling her what's best given the situation she's in.

Liyanne, your posts indicate that you trying to help your sister and that you have her best interest in your thoughts, if its unlikely that you sister mental health is going to improve you might want to discuss with your sister now about making you POA for her and her family its better a member of the family is POA rather than someone that the DWP / Court of Protection appoints there are many different levels of POA

http://www.sense.org.uk/content/managing-benefits-behalf-somebody-else

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/relationships_e/relationships_looking_after_people_e/managing_affairs_for_someone_else.htm#h_when_does_someone_lack_mental_capacity

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the great advice.

 

Vinny - I have read the links about appointing POA, very useful, thank you.

 

My sister has now provided all the information that was asked of her such as bank statements etc to the compliance officer. What will happen next ?. She was advised the statements will be sent to the overpayment section and she will receive a letter stating how much she has to repay. Is this the usual process ?. Who decides what happens / outcome? She is still worried sick and is hardly eating or sleeping. She has even exceeded her anti depressant dosage on a number of occasions. She thinks the compliance officer is lying to her and will pass her case to fraud section rather than the overpayment section. I truly hope this situation is resolved, I feel so sorry for her :-(

 

 

As always, your help is very much appreciated. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no particular reason to believe that the documents will be passed to the Fraud people. If the Fraud folks were interested in the case, they'd have wanted to conduct an Interview Under Caution so that they could potentially use the interview answers in court. This did not happen. Unless your sister confessed to some outrageous fraud as part of her Compliance interview, the documents will be passed to the Overpayment team as stated.

 

As noted by Mr P upthread, the overpayment is quite possibly a lot less than than £17k. If she only had £8000 in savings, that probably less than £1000 as an overpayment.

 

What you've described is a perfectly normal procedure when the Compliance officers do not think there has been any fraud. The decision on the overpayment will be made by the overpayments team.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Antone. Only 2 questions were asked at the interview: 1) did she have £8000 in her bank account when she claimed, YES. and 2) why did she not mention this ? She apologised for her ignorance and said she completely forgot and did not even think it was relevant. She was then asked to provide statements and told a letter will arrive from overpayments team soon. The interview lasted under 10 minutes.

 

She went to the law centre this week and asked if she should inform housing benefit regarding the compliance interview and also give her bank statements. She was advised not to contact HB as they would then start investigating her and more trouble will follow. She was advised that as she is no longer claiming any benefits ( she started work and cancelled all her benefit claims prior to compliance interview ), the HB section would not have much interest in her.

 

I can't help but worry. If there's a JSA overpayment, doesn't that also create a HB overpayment? I obviously don't want to advise her against a solicitor's advice but am confused. The solicitor even mentioned the case of a man he dealt with who had about a £10k overpayment of Income Support but was never contacted by housing benefits.

 

What do you guys think?. Thank you so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Income support is a 'passported benefit' for housing benefit. as long as she would have been receiving some income support then her entitlement to housing benefit would remain. As she only had £8000 of savings (and I'm assuming no other capital or income) then there would be no point when she wouldn't be entitled to some income support and therefore would have maintained full hb entitlement the whole time. Therefore no hb overpayment.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...