Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Global debt management recovery ltd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anybody heard of these delightful people?

 

They have left messages on my phone and sent letters

- the debt is something ran up by my ex husband

- we split up 13 years ago

 

I rang them and said I wanted the details taken off their records and the guy started cross examining me

 

The debt isn't mine and letters are all in my old married name

- he said he had got me by the electoral register

and would speak to his colleague jack jones tomorrow

to make a decision on whether or not they will remove the details

 

I've sent the letter back not at this Address

 

They were very nasty and have unnerved me ringing my house

- I only checked messages as I am waiting a hospital appointment.

Can anybody advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop talking to them, and get a FULL complaint in writing to them and to the regulators.

 

If they start sending letters to you for a debt that isnt yours, then they are in very deep trouble. Especially 13 years after the debt was accrued and its well Statute Barred.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

he said he had got me by the electoral register and would speak to his colleague jack jones tomorrow to make a decision on whether or not they will remove the details

I've sent the letter back not at this Address

 

Jack Jones indeed!! Stupid little boy, if he rings again, tell him he's got two hopes and one of those is 'Bob' laugh then hang up.

 

In all seriousness, check your credit file, just in case they have been foolish enough to leave muddy footprints over it, if they ring, then laugh and hang up, repeat the process until they receive this letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387367-Harassment-by-Telephone-(update-21.04.2014)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack Jones indeed!! Stupid little boy, if he rings again, tell him he's got two hopes and one of those is 'Bob' laugh then hang up.

 

In all seriousness, check your credit file, just in case they have been foolish enough to leave muddy footprints over it, if they ring, then laugh and hang up, repeat the process until they receive this letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387367-Harassment-by-Telephone-(update-21.04.2014)

Thank you I've just read my credit report and they haven't searched it and my old married name from 13 years ago isn't even on there so not sure how they got my details which is a worry - the man who left the message said he was called jack jones too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them to the regulators and then ignore their prattle. Something like this MUST be reported.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe he is a one band??

 

As Renegade said, complain to all who purport to police this incestuous industry.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help - what if there is a ccj on this because my ex has not paid what he should? Will it still be statue barred? Like I said there is nothing on my credit report linking me to this at all or my old married name I'm a bit of a panic merchant to be honest so really worried

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say this is not your debt?

 

Not a joint debt was it?

 

Might be an idea to expand on what the debt actually is/was?

 

If it was something for your ex and you were not part of it i.e. joint and several liability then you have no need to worry.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was in his name and I was down as secondary on what he took out - he said he was paying the debt but like many other things hasn't it looks like it's not been paid since 2002 we divorced the year after and it's been 14 years since I had any contact with him

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your name was on it as well, you would probably have been liable for it. But chances are now, it is well and truely statute barred.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your name was on it as well, you would probably have been liable for it. But chances are now, it is well and truely statute barred.

 

Ok thanks very much I've searched my credit record and can't see it listed or any CCJ so that's reassuring thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may well be but if he has been making, say, token payments on it then it may not be that easy.

 

It does sound like this may well be SB but we need to be careful about definitive statements without knowing the full details.

 

Perhaps some more investigating to find out when exactly the last payment or written acknowledgement was?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what i was thinking ims. i very much doubt her ex has paid anything, but as you say we cant be sure. Chances are the DCA doesnt know that, so why not make them do all the leg work.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what i was thinking ims. i very much doubt her ex has paid anything, but as you say we cant be sure. Chances are the DCA doesnt know that, so why not make them do all the leg work.

 

 

I doubt he's paid a penny last I heard he had moved totally out of the area I'll see if jack jones calls me back tomorrow and take it from there or see if they send any other letters

Thank you for the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he calls. Dont talk to them you are being phished and marked as gullible. If they call again just say " in writing please" and hang up. Dont get into a convo with them. Just hang up.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he calls. Dont talk to them you are being phished and marked as gullible. If they call again just say " in writing please" and hang up. Dont get into a convo with them. Just hang up.

 

thank you i will do that

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they call again just say " in writing please" and hang up.

 

Blooming eck renegade, your very polite!! :madgrin:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always suggest being polite to start with, even if they arent. Then if theyre stupid enough to call again, then start the skrillex down the phone :)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you divorced the law treats it as if you have died and the debt only remains with the principal so if your hubby owed money they cannot chase you as you are legally dead as far as the debt is concerned. Likewise, it he is due a windfall from back then you dont get any of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...