Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jacobs & Council Tax - advising they will charge new Fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3696 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, interesting discussion.

 

I have received a letter from Bristow and Sutor who are trying to collect about 600 quids worth of council tax (although their letter says 700 and something now)

 

As of yet i have just ignored them, made no contact. Ideally i'd like it to be passed back to the council so i can just pay in installments. Worst case i could pay it off in full but i am self employed so try to limit damage to cash flow.

 

The letter says 'New enforcement process' and says i must pay in full within 5 days of the letter. It says failure to do so will result in them coming around to take my goods. They mention changes to the processes coming into effect as of the 6th of April. The letter reads as if they can now turn up at your house and drill the locks. They talk about locksmith charges on the back of the letter.

 

They also say i can only pay them to stop this, presumably to stop me paying the council and them not getting their fee's?

 

Is it just scaremongering? I never bothered revoking their implied right of access, i couldn't be bothered, but it seems as if that is now no longer possible?

 

They use the word bailiffs to describe themselves, but aren't they just debt collectors? I will also add that a magistrates liability order was made against me middle of last year.

 

Nicholas.

Edited by Jackofall
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jackofall they are bailiffs and will be attending to enforce the liability order, and a NOIRA will not keep them out. Looks like they are getting ready to implement tye new Taking Control Of Goods ASAP, with the threat of the new fees as a lever for people to let them in to levy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's bloody annoying.

 

Will calling them to set up a payment plan stop them wanting to come around?

 

Failing that i guess i could always pay the council direct, online and let the bailiffs know i've paid the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them for now. They can only charge 2 visit fee's.... until these silly changes happen.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to jump on this thread, is there a link to these new changes? Bit worried!!!

 

 

Read from here

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1894/contents/made

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?398412-Taking-Control-of-Goods-Regulations-2013

 

tomtubby has made several posts in regards to this happy reading

 

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them for now. They can only charge 2 visit fee's.... until these silly changes happen.

 

The two visit fees if left outstanding, will turn into the compliance fee, if they are outstanding any further visits will incur the £235 attendance fee, definetly wouldnt advise ignoring

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, i did look for a council tax section but got a bit lost.

 

Just ignore them for now. They can only charge 2 visit fee's.... until these silly changes happen.

 

I have ignored them and looking at what i owe and what they say i owe they have charged for two visits.

 

So if i ignore them what will happen? will they turn up after April the 6th to drill me?

 

I guess in an ideal world i would be able to coerce the council to take the debt back or get the bailiffs to send it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just ignore them for now. They can only charge 2 visit fee's.... until these silly changes happen.

 

Please do not take this the wrong way but the above advice should NOT be given at all !!!

 

The new regulations are due to take effect on 6th April and debtors will be in for a huge shock .

 

The government have issued statutory regulations to cover cases that are already being managed "in house" by the enforcement companies. In essence if a debtor's account is currently subject to a payment arrangement and the account defaults after 6th April the enforcement company may make an 'enforcement visit' and fees of £235 will legally be applicable.

 

Furthermore, if no payment arrangement is yet in place.....then it is vitally important to make sure that the debtor contacts the company immediately to set up such an arrangement.

 

The days when a debtor can ignore bailiff correspondence is finished.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a debtor couldn't afford the original council tax, and the £42.50 for the visit fees, they aren't going to be able to afford the new fees either, but you are correct TT early action and avoidance of Ostrich mode is essential from now on.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps we need a thread about 'paying council tax' to avoid expensive bailiff fees. As there is now potential of having to pay these increased fees, perhaps a thread that covers the council tax billing procedure and when councils are allowed to use bailiffs etc. If more people are aware of the system, hopefully they can avoid paying any bailiff fees.

 

There is also a question. If someone already has a liability order for an old council tax bill say from 2012 or before 6/4/14. They have been ignoring letters/bailiffs etc. They may or may not have paid anything to the council directly. Would these people be liable for the new bailiff fees or only those fee that applied when the liability order was actually obtained ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that they would have to stump up the new fees if enforcement commenced after April 6th as the whole system changes.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do not take this the wrong way but the above advice should NOT be given at all !!!

 

The new regulations are due to take effect on 6th April and debtors will be in for a huge shock .

 

The government have issued statutory regulations to cover cases that are already being managed "in house" by the enforcement companies. In essence if a debtor's account is currently subject to a payment arrangement and the account defaults after 6th April the enforcement company may make an 'enforcement visit' and fees of £235 will legally be applicable.

 

Furthermore, if no payment arrangement is yet in place.....then it is vitally important to make sure that the debtor contacts the company immediately to set up such an arrangement.

 

The days when a debtor can ignore bailiff correspondence is finished.

 

My apologies TT. Looks like i have some reading to do on the new regulations.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent the council an email.

 

I pointed out that the fees i am going to rack up will be counter productive. I indicated that the goods in my property aren't worth what i owe and that what is of value is used for work. I explained that as they well know, the bailiffs will take anything and everything irrespective of the damage it will do to earning potential and the goods wont even cover their fees. I told them that it will ultimately go to court and take great deal of time to clear and incur yet more charges.

 

I offered them a lump sum, 400 and told them to spread the rest on the current years payments and set up a standing order. I also pointed out that i am getting working tax credit so they could take that if they wished.

 

The email pretty much highlights that they will make a repairable situation worse.

 

If i was them i wouldn't refuse but you never know with these toss pots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting back to the original questions, 1 important one still remains unanswered. After the 6th April, Will bailiffs be able to break in/force entry to remove goods or will they still need to gain peaceful entry?

 

The reason I ask is because I am in a similar position to the OP in the fact that I have a couple of outstanding council tax bills and am already on the second bailiff. I definatly can not afford to pay the outstanding at this time and have also just ignored them. (At the moment I can't even pay this years bill)

 

Am I likely to come home one day and find the door has been drilled?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start paying what is affordable to you even if its only £3-£5 a week, pay the Council direct, pay them on the same day every week and make sure you quote the correct ref no's for the years your paying to.It helps to build up a history to being a 'trying to pay'. After the 6th April the Councils will need to be a lot more careful before they start sending in enforcement agents (that's bailiffs to you and I)...and explore alternative methods for recovery ..I think we will see a lot more attachments to earnings or benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start paying what is affordable to you even if its only £3-£5 a week, pay the Council direct, pay them on the same day every week and make sure you quote the correct ref no's for the years your paying to.It helps to build up a history to being a 'trying to pay'. After the 6th April the Councils will need to be a lot more careful before they start sending in enforcement agents (that's bailiffs to you and I)...and explore alternative methods for recovery ..I think we will see a lot more attachments to earnings or benefits.

 

As i understand it, the council have passed it to baiiffs and the bailiff letters say you need to deal with them only. I know the council can't refuse payments, but him paying the council a few quid a week won't resolve the bailiff matter will it?

 

I think i am going to call the bailiffs tomorrow and see what sort of payment plan they would accept. i really don't want to part with a massive chunk of cash, but i will if it stops the doors being drilled, which appears to be the case as of now on...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt matter if the bailiffs are involved. All they can do is pester you then hand it back to the council. If you are paying the council direct, then they would be hard pressed to take action as you are making payments. Thats not to say they cant, just theyd have limited options.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read this thread- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?421247-Walking-Possession- post 3 in particular, you will see that as the bailiffs were called in before the new legislation

then they have to work to the current rules.

Not sure that even after the new legislation that bailiffs will be able to break in or drill locks without a court order. In fact, I don't think they will be even able to enter via an open window in future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they are no more able to drill locks at will from April 6th any more than they can now, thgey still need peaceful entry

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so they still need peaceful entry it would seem according to what some of you have suggested, which sounds good to me and makes me feel a bit less concerned about having my door messed with.

 

I want to get a clear understanding of this situation not only for myself but clarity for others too.

 

The letter Bristow and Sutor sent is titled in bold 'New Enforcement Process Commenced'

 

The opening paragraph explains the liability order against me and talks about the visits made.

 

They then suggest in the next paragraph 'the process and fees they charge will change on the 6th of April', and inform me that they will then be acting as enforcement agents wanting to take control of goods in accordance with Schedule 12 of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement act 2007.

 

Then in the middle of the letter they say payment must be made in full within 5 days.

 

Then in bold. Failure to pay will result in enforcement agents being instructed to visit the address to take control of the goods. The cost of the visit will be a minimum of £235. Then it says, if your goods are removed further costs will be payable.

 

What i would like to know is, if i start paying the council say £150 a month and just totally ignore the bailiffs will the bailiffs eventually give up and pass it back to the council? As you say, if i am paying the council taking further action (getting permission from the court to break in) will become difficult.

 

And, what happens to the bailiff fees if i am ignoring them and paying the council direct. Presumably they will turn up within the near future for a third time and then bill me a further £235 on top of their existing charges?

 

Thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...