Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3431 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon All.

 

I was really looking for some advice on way's I can move forward with the following situation:

 

My partner, son and I live in a housing association property and pay £870 per month for a 2 bedroom house.

 

As of February 2013 I had to change jobs due to my previous company making redundancies

and jumped into the next suitable job for financial security purposes etc.

 

I went from a 30k a year salary to 23k per year and my partner takes home roughly £650 per month

as she works part-time due to being the primary carer for our son.

 

Unfortunately as we both have bad poor credit scores we need to use payday loans to help us get throught the month

but now are in a situation where we are taking them out to help with living and the cost of rent!

 

Each month we are needing to pay back the previous loan

and take out another one and the amount with interest has gradually increased

as we have needed slightly more each month as we are loosing a lot of money in interest.

 

The problem we have now is that the maximum loan I can take out just about covers the rent

but we'll have nothing else to live off of for the month.

 

I'm not too sure what to do with this one,

I don't want to get into rent arrears or have a payday loan we can't pay back,

especially as I can't imagine them being that flexible.

 

Is there any support or advice out there to help manage housing association rental arrears

as I don't see any other solution to get us through the month then to pay less on the rent?

 

Unfortunatly there isn't anyone we could ask to burrow the money from.

 

Thank you for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you came to us at the right time.

 

Have you discussed payment plans with the companies concerned?

Who are they as well?

 

While a company may ask for an Income & Expenditure info, you are not legally obliged to provide this info, however I would suggest you sit down and analyse what's coming in and out and if you have money to the side, use it to pay it off.

If you do slip on the Payment, its not necessarily a bad thing.

Yes you'll end up with a default / Late payment markers, but would you be willing to pay back in instalments?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks fkofilee. We have been using the Cheque Centre for instant cash loans.

 

I'm confident with an income and expendature showing our inability to pay the amount back but if I default they are likely to contact me at my place of employment which can't happen or attempt to take funds out of our account anyway.

 

If we could have some form of rent relief or something for a month then we could potentially get back on track.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice there by fkofilee.

 

You need to secure your finances and your bank accounts then start negotiatibg with pdls.

 

It is relatively easy to do but some pdls will make you tear your hair out in frustration with some of the unlawful things they get up to.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest cancelling the debit card linked to the PDL... That way they shouldn't be able to clear the bank account out.

 

This puts you in control plus you can get another one reasonably quick. Plus you can order them to not contact you at work however if they are a good company then they should know by the OFT debt collection guidelines they shouldn't be ringing your work.

Also because the Cheque Centre is on the high street, you could just turn up to pay them in a payment plan :)

 

So no standing order crap :)

 

Trust me, if the CC send you to Motormile Finance... Thats a different kettle of fish.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help, much appreciated. The problem is they'll probably only accept high amounts as a repayment plan which may result in the account being sold to Motormile anyway. Is it not better to see if there is any flexibility on the rent and see if that can be spead across future payments etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO

 

your rent comes FIRST

 

stuff the PDL's companies.

 

cancelling the card wont help either.

 

you need to cancel the Continuous Payment Authority

 

do it NOW with you bank.

 

drop ALL the PDL stuff down to a tiny level so you can PAY your priority bills

 

rent/ctax/elec/gas.

 

the rest can go swivel and get £5 for 6mts or so.

 

the ROOF over your head comes FIRST.

 

We have been telling people to put a letter into their bank instructing

them not to make any payments under any circumstances to these companies

.

http://whatconsumer.co.uk/visa-debit-chargeback/- it works!

.

.

banks MUST follow written intructions from their customers !

remember..cancelling your card ..IS NOT THE ANSWER..cancel the CPA

.

This fsa [now the FCA] 11:24 31/05/2013 guide has now been updated:

.

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/consumer_...ghts_guide.pdf

.

Here's the text:

.

Cancelling a regular

card payment:

.

When you give your credit or debit card details to a company and authorise them to take regular payments from your account,

such as for a gym membership or magazine subscription,

it is known as a ‘recurring transaction’ or ‘continuous payment authority’.

These are often confused with direct debits, but do not offer the same guarantee if the amount or date of the payment changes.

In most cases, regular payments can be cancelled by telling the company taking the payments.

.

However,

you have the right to cancel them directly with your bank or card issuer by telling it that you have stopped permission for the payments.

Your bank or card issuer must then stop them – it has no right to insist that you agree this first with the company taking the payments.

Be aware, though, that you will still be responsible for paying any money that you owe.

.

see: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?336569-How-to-remove-a-lender-s-continuous-payment-authority(2-Viewing)-nbsp

.

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/product_news/banking/know_your_rights/solving/index.shtml

and

Attach the following to your claim and in the interim period write to your bank and attach the following (Keep a copy)

Regulation 55 of The Payment Services Regulations 2009:

55.—(1) A payment transaction is to be regarded as having been authorised by the payer for the purposes of this Part only if the payer has given its consent to—

(a)the execution of the payment transaction; or .

(b)the execution of a series of payment transactions of which that payment transaction forms part. .

(2) Such consent—

(a)may be given before or, if agreed between the payer and its payment service provider, after the execution of the payment transaction; and .

(b)must be given in the form, and in accordance with the procedure, agreed between the payer and its payment service provider. .

(3) The payer may withdraw its consent to a payment transaction at any time before the point at which the payment order can no longer be revoked under regulation 67.

(4) Subject to regulation 67(3) to (5), the payer may withdraw its consent to the execution of a series of payment transactions at any time with the effect that any future payment transactions are not regarded as authorised for the purposes of this Part.

This means that you can simply ask your bank to refuse the payments, it is also good practice to let the lender know too.

So, if you would like your creditor to stop trying to take a payment all you need to do, in theory, is to inform them that you remove their authority. It's probably better to do this in writing and via recorded delivery - if possible.

You can learn more about your rights via the following fsa guide :

Ending recurring payments from credit cards

57 Recurring payments, is the term used to describe transactions for which a client has granted written permission for her/his credit or debit card to be debited for recurring goods or services, for example, club membership subscriptions, insurance cover or payday loansicon. The card may be debited annually, monthly or at other regular intervals.

.

58 In most cases, recurring payments can be cancelled by telling the trader taking the payments. However, a client has the right to withdraw consent by simply telling whoever issued the card (the bank, building society or credit card company) that s/he does not want a payment to be made. S/he can tell the card issuer by phone, email or letter.

.

59 The card issuer has no right to insist that the client ask the trader to stop taking the payment first. The card issuer has to stop the payments if the client has asked them to. The client could point out to the card issuer that they should follow the FSA guidance available in the FSA know your rightsicon booklet which is available on the FSA website at www.fsa.gov.uk.

.

59a If money is still taken from the client's account, it will be deemed to be an unauthorised transaction, and the card issuer must give her/him an immediate refund. The card issuer will have to cancel any interest and charges added to the her/his account because the payment was taken. It is not up to the client to prove that s/he told the card issuer to stop taking payments. Instead, the card issuer would have to prove that s/he did not tell them to stop making payments.

.

60 The client should make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service when all the internal complaints systems within the company issuing the card have been exhausted.

I hope this information is of assistance

 

New june 2013

 

Regulator orders Banks and mutuals to review complaints about not cancelling recurring payments from November 2009.

Consumers who have set up a regular payment from their account will now be able to successfully cancel that arrangement

by contacting their card provider, the Financial Conduct Authority said.

The FCA has been examining how easy it is for customers to cancel Continuous Payment Authorities (CPAs)

due either to payday lendersicon or for other regular payments such as subscriptions or gymicon memberships.

 

CPAs, which are also commonly called recurring transactions or recurring payments,

are relatively easy to set up but can be hard to cancel, causing problems for consumers trying to manage their finances,the FCA said.

 

Now, following the FCA review of how the largest high street banks and mutuals process requests to cancel CPAs, they have agreed that they will ensure that when a customer asks for a recurring payment to end, that will be sufficient to cancel the arrangement. They have also confirmed that should a payment go through by mistake following cancellation by a customer the customer will be refunded immediately.

 

In addition to securing this commitment, the largest banks and mutuals have agreed to review every individual complaint they have received about the non-cancellation of a CPA and to pay redress where payments have continued to be made despite the customer cancelling the arrangement. This applies to all complaints since November 2009 when the Financial Services Authority, the FCA’s predecessor, began regulating banking conduct.

 

Clive Adamson, the FCA’s director of supervision, said: “It’s important that consumers are confident that banks are meeting their everyday banking needs. Today customers can be confident that when they ask for a Continuous Payment Authority to be cancelled – it will be cancelled - and that it can be done easily.

 

“We recognise that historically this is an area where some customers have struggled but the banks and mutuals have responded positively to our work on this issue. From now on we expect them to be getting this right. In addition, they have committed to review past complaints.”

 

http://www.ftadviser.com/2013/06/28/regulation/regulators/fca-banks-have-to-cancel-recurring-payments-if-requested-UxbeHUuYQIy0SEYbGRE4tJ/article.html

 

 

as for payments to the pdl's

TELL [dont ask] them they are only going to get £xxPCM for xx mts

as a goodwill gesture

and as a reciprocal GOGW they must freeze int & refrain from levying PENALTY charges.

if they wont

drop them to £1PCM for life.

.

as an example>

LETTER 1

.

I am currently in financial difficulties and not able to meet my normal monthly repayments.

to show my goodwill, i am going to pay £5 for 6 mts.

 

i will update you in 6mts time or before, should my situation change.

could you please as a reciprocal goodwill guesture,

refrain from levying any penalty charges & freeze the interest on my account.?

Should you fail to assist me during a period of financial difficulty, contrary to all the guidelines and codes

issued by the relevent bodies and authorities that govern you and the way you conduct yourselves.

i shall have no alternative but to reduce my offer to £1PCM for the rest of the life of the account,

as your actions would do nothing to help me.

i thank you for your time.

signed

.

then pay by your internet banking site

.

and get reclaiming

.

TAKE CONTROL

.

if you have sent the above and they refuse

then write back........

.

.LETTER 2

 

i'm sorry, but you have failed to assist me during a period of financial difficulty,

against all the guidelines and codes issued by the relevent bodies and authorities

that govern you and the way you conduct yourselves.

i repeat again, the contents of my letter dated dd/mm/yyyy, for want of clarification:

to show my goodwill, i am going to pay £XX for XX mts

could you please as a reciprocal goodwill guesture, refraining from levying any penalty charges

& freeze the interest on my account.

i will update you in 6mts time or before, should my situation chance.

should you fail to help by refraining from levying unlawful PENALTY charges & freeze my interest,

i shall have no alternative but to reduce my offer to £1PCM for the rest of the life of the account,

as your actions are doing nothing to help me.

This is contrary to the rules you should operate under.

disgruntled account holder

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX is right, Maybe its best to cancel the CPA... But in the past i have cancelled my card to stop unauthorised payments... Usually from experience but the guys know better here :)

Use the letters here :) . these should sort it out.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing you ALWAYS do when it comes to PDL's and repayments, is secure your bank account. THEN start negotiation with them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely right, your rent is PRIORITY!!!!

 

Call your bank and cancel the Continuous Payment Authority (CPA) with your bank, do this by telephone AND letter into your local/nearest branch, when doing this also stress that they companies involved no longer have any authority from you to access your account.

 

My experience indicated that once they realise they cannot take anything from your account, they are more inclined to start listening to your proposals. Do take a look at the Govan Law post, fantastic tips in there!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Afternoon

 

My partner and I have lived in a housing association property now for 3 years.

 

I wanted to see if there is anything we can do the query the amount of rent they charge us per month.

 

We live in a small 2 bedroom house with 1 child and pay £870 per calender month.

 

Has anyone queried this type of thing before? Sometimes it feels like people are paying quite a bit less for the same, if not more then we have.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, that does sound pretty excessive unless you're living in London. I love on a one bedroom place we near Salisbury and pay £98 a week.

Any neighbours you can ask for a comparison ? That sounds more like private rent prices to me !

 

Lynda~

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank's Minkiesmum, yeah it does feel that way sometimes.

 

We live in Surrey which is quite pricey but still it just feels that incomparison to other people I know they pay less. Some may live in "Council" properties but I thought Housing Association places are supposed to be affordable housing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. I was paying £143 a week for a one bedroom with private rent (£575 a month). The only difference I've found is that the housing association charges weekly too so some months they're getting more than others which is a bit naughty.

A 2 bedroomed house in Hampshire would usually be around £650 a month and we're a pricey county too although maybe not as bad as Surrey. However, we're not over £200 a month different ! I'd certainly query it. I sat on a list almost 5 years to land the housing association place with the affordable rent and it is, now, but yours isn't in the least.

 

Lynda~

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PhoenixLaw

 

As this is to do with Housing Association I will move your thread to Residential and Commercial Lettings as you my get better advice their.

 

Its administrative so nothing for you to do and I will leave a short redirect.

 

Now what the Housing Association will have is a Policy on how they set their rents normally called:

 

Rent Setting Policy so I would write to HA and request a copy of that policy.

 

Also is your property by any chance classed as 'New Build'.

 

Speak to your neighbours to see if they are paying the same rent

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rent you pay will depend on the type of tenancy you have. Even though you say you rent from a housing association, if it is temporary housing in any way, there is a likelihood the property has been rented by the HA and re-let to you - hence the higher rent. Social rents are subsidised, so should not be at that level, whatever area of the country you live in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if you're on an intermediate rent scheme which are more expensive than general HA rent. If so I'd have thought you'd be aware of it. http://m.england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/finding_a_place_to_live/intermediate_renting

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Good Afternoon

 

I was looking to get some assistance with how to handle the following situation:

 

My Partner, Son and I have been renting the same housing association property for 4 years now. As of February 2013 I was at risk of redundancy so took a 4-5k pay cut and jumped into another position to safeguard my emplyment.

 

Throughout the last 17months or so its been tough in terms of keeping on top of bills, rent, childcare etc.

 

Unfortunately I now have £1,000 worth of rent owing which has slowly built up over this time.

 

I was notified by the Council(who manage the Housing Association properties) this week that I have 7 days to pay £640 or they take the matter to court.

 

I have just accepted an offer for a better paid job and start on Monday but its only 3k more then I'm on to start with.

 

I have obviously tried to re-negotiate a repayment plan with the council already but this increased my rent from £850 per month to £960 which was, in hindsight too ambitious.

 

My partner and I earn over the required amount to qualify for any benefitsand have poor credit so paying the £600 isn’t possible.

If anyone could give anyadvice that would be much appreciated.

Thank you for your time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't imagine the HA taking you to court for what amounts to just over a month's worth of arrears - however, if you have made a previous agreement and failed to stick to it, that is the type of thing that would lead to them taking action against you.

 

Make another offer - one you can afford this time, and start paying it. You do not have to offer them a lump sum as they suggest, just make a monthly offer you can afford.

 

Put the offer in writing - include an income and expenditure form if possible, as this will show them that you are offering as much as you can afford.

 

If it goes to court, on arrears of just over a month, a judge is likely (at worst) to order a suspended possession order on terms (such terms being that you pay the current rent plus something towards the arrears) or (at best) an adjournment on terms (see previous parenthesis comment).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Good Morning

On Saturday I received a N54 form from My local court regarding housing association rent arrears that have slowly built up over the last 12 months. The date of eviction I have been given is 10/12/2014 (9 days’ time!)

My standard monthly rent should be £850 but due to the amount outstanding I was required to pay £1,125 per month.

Unfortunately I was unable to keep to the previous CCJ repayments due to changes in employment for my partner and I amongst other reasons.

In October I paid £700.00 towards rent and a week ago for November’s payment I paid £900.00.

I know I need to complete a N244 form asap but wanted to see if anyone had any advice on how I should proceed or things to be aware of?

I would of gone to the CAB but with work commitment’s I am definitely not going to be able to spend time out of the office meeting with them etc. It will be a push to get time off to attend court as in the industry I work in it’s the busiest time of year.

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thank you for your time!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, how much are the arrears ? Are you actually able to afford the monthly rent plus something towards the arrears each month ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn.

 

 

Thanks for the message! I can yes, I have emailed the HA asking for the total arrears to date and asked if there is any flexibility in coming to another agreement rather then applying for a suspension. I am yet to hear back, sent the email yesterday but will chase this afternoon if no news.

 

 

I think it's around £1,000-£1,500 that's owed. Comfortably I can afford 100-150 per month on top of the rent.

 

 

This is what was previously agreed:

 

 

HA- "Your rent is £213.15 per week – Multiply by 52 weeks & divide by 12 monthly payments gives you a monthly total of £923.65 + the £100.00 per month off the arrears makes £1023.65".

When I moved into the property it was £852 per month as I get paid monthly but since living there the HA have been after more per month because they charge weekly. Funny how they said it was fine when we moved in then the goalposts changed.

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...