Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

o2 credit default with FOS **WON DEFAULT REMOVED + COMPO**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I know this subject has been discussed a hundred times

but I am seeking advice on the best course of action

regarding a default that o2 added to my credit file over the paltry sum of £29.82.

 

The first thing to say is the outstanding balance has never been paid

as I was unaware that I had an outstanding balance,

 

with that in mind it is curious that in feb 2013 the credit file was marked as settled.

 

my bank have confirmed there was never any payment to o2 for this amount from my bank account.

 

My contract was setup with a monthly direct debit & had ended in august 2012,

 

we never got round to cancelling the dd mandate until the feb of 2013 which my bank have confirmed,

 

why would an outstanding balance have been present with an active dd still there?

 

During the whole of this period & to this day

my address, email & telephone contact details are unchanged

they could have easily contacted me with reference to any outstanding amounts

which obviously they claim to have done!

but I have simply never had any contact.

 

The credit referral team have simply refused my request to have the default removed

because there records show the late/default payments from sep 2012 to feb 2013,

so what is my best course of action?

 

I think I can demonstrate from the other evidence on my credit file that I was capable of making such a payment.

 

I believe this default is responsible for my being refused credit on several occasions

& I am getting ever more concerned with a looming remortgage on the horizon.

 

 

chip

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is indeed very worrying that small sums such as this are causing people so much grief with their credit files.

 

I wonder if a formal complaint to their Head office, explain pretty much how you have above.

 

DD was in place, why did they simply not ask for the money ?

They did not send a Default Notice or any other notice advising there was an outstanding balance ?

Your address/telephone number remain unchanged, so there was no reason that prevented them from contacting you.

 

You believe the marker on your file has been placed unfairly and if they cannot see their way to removing it, then you will be making a complaint to the Information Commissioner.

 

Do you know if the balance has been assigned to a DCA - you say the account is marked as settled on your credit file - it is usually an indicator they have offloaded it for collection to someone like Lowells !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem a little odd they didnt request the payment etc,

Honestly, im not quite sure what to make of this one, unless there is more to it that O2 Arent telling you.

 

Try an email to the CEO (CEOEmail Website)

Could hold the key here, but also as well, the ICO is the right next step

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies,

 

 

If they have passed onto a DCA i have never heard anything from them which seems odd as my address hasn't changed in the past (nearly) 9 years.

 

 

I have appealed to there complaints department but am not holding my breath having read the numerous examples of bad practise documented on the good old web so i guess i will have to try the ICO route in due course.

 

 

This is all extremely distressing over such a paltry sum, it genuinely baffles me that companies can exert such a negative effect on your credit file over such trivial disputes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would expect the account from o2 is shown as settled because they sold it on.

 

if they have, then you should have received a notice of assignment from the debt buyer.

 

however, as you indicate, its such a small figure

that even the likes of lowells wont bother buying the debt

so thus the addition entry under the buyer name

with the 'correct' defaulted balance is not showing.

 

before the contract ended, did you actually cancel the contract with o2

or did it rollover and get renewed, as sadly, their T&C's will cover this.

 

it's a very big issue that a 'gadget' debt can ruin a future mortgage etc etc

 

something must be done about this scenario

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would expect the account from o2 is shown as settled because they sold it on.

 

if they have, then you should have received a notice of assignment from the debt buyer.

 

however, as you indicate, its such a small figure

that even the likes of lowells wont bother buying the debt

so thus the addition entry under the buyer name

with the 'correct' defaulted balance is not showing.

 

before the contract ended, did you actually cancel the contract with o2

or did it rollover and get renewed, as sadly, their T&C's will cover this.

it's a very big issue that a 'gadget' debt can ruin a future mortgage etc etc

 

something must be done about this scenario

 

dx

 

I absolutely agree with you on this - especially as it usually appears that it is poor administration on the part of the phone company where cancellation by phone has not been recorded. :(

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I most certainly did cancel the contract because I was disputing with them the cost of renewal

against changing provider which was half the price.

 

I had until that point been perfectly happy with the service I had received from o2

but was not prepared to pay such a high premium for that service!

 

sadly however the cancellation was done over the phone not in writing,

that said if cancellation was an issue I would have had considerably greater outstanding balance than the £29.82 so I cant see them trying that one?

 

I have sent an email to the complaints dept asking for a satisfactory response as this has been ongoing since last may,

failing that I guess the ico or small claims are my only options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would provide an update on my complaint to o2.

 

I have now contacted the complaints review service at o2 again asking them for a satisfactory response

to my earlier complaint which was made in may 2013,

 

as of today I have had no reply (7 days) & I thought I would also email the ceo to see if his office could give some urgency to the whole affair?

 

 

In the meantime I have asked my bank for written confirmation the dd mandate was active until feb 2013 ( a full 6 months after the phone contract ended)

& that the outstanding balance of £29.82 was never collected even though it is marked on o2 records as physical payment with £0 balance on 15 feb 2013.

 

 

Obviously the most important thing for us is to have credit file corrected

but would it would be worth trying to pursue compensation for the wasted time

in trying to sort this also the unfavourable rate at which we have had to borrow our personal loan at?

 

not to mention the several failed attempts to obtain credit over the past 18 months.

Edited by chip247
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello again,

I hope that someone can suggest the best course of action for my dispute?

 

I have had recent communications with a gentleman in the executive relations dept at O2 &

I don't feel my complaint is being dealt with fairly at all now.

In spite of having proof that my dd mandate was still in place some 6 months after my contract ended

they are resolutely denying fault in the final payment not being collected.

Here is a transcript of the relevant parts of the email I have just received.

 

"We can only remove an entry from your credit file if we have clear proof that we’re at fault.

In this case we produced a bill and tried to take the payment 14 days later,

this wasn’t paid and so it was passed to a Debt Collection Agency.

 

You’ve asked for proof of the letters that were sent, this isn’t something we have on record.

You’d advised again that no payment was made, if this was the case, it would still be outstanding and would still show on your credit file.

 

I understand that you may still be unhappy but this is our final position.

If you’d like to take it further you’ll need to seek advice outside of O2."

 

As you can see they are digging there heels in, but at least after 18 months i now confirmation that the debt was passed onto a debt collection agency!

In my reply i was going to insist under the terms of the data protection act that they provide all information they hold on myself

including all correspondence they claim to have sent,

as i have not had a single letter regarding this £29 outstanding balance from O2 or the the debt collection agency.

 

I really am at a loss what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

time for an sar they need to PROVE they tried to take the payment

 

if they cant then gameover.

 

as they've put it in B&W now that they did try they MUST prove it or remove the default

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thanks for your reply, I have made a sar request, what I find remarkable is they state to not have any of the letters they've sent me on record!! surely if that were the case they cannot prove they were sent at all?

 

 

Ironically I had a call from O2 sales a few days ago wondering if I'd be interested in becoming a customer!!! you can imagine my response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just an update on my case, after 2 years in which O2 still have not budged from there position I have finally heard from the FOS & they have found in my favour. Before I accept the FOS decision I wanted to see if you guys think I am right to push for more compensation though because the FOS have suggested £75 which as far as I am concerned is laughable.

Here is the contents of an email I have just fired off to O2 before commencing small claims action, What do you think?

 

 

 

Thank you once again for the absolute professionalism with which your company have dealt with my complaint. I thought perhaps i should advise you that the FOS have not been so vehement in there support of your decision, in fact they are in agreement with my position & it is now clear that not only did you give the debt recovery company the wrong account information, you were you sending emails to the wrong person regarding this debt!

 

 

Now that I have the FOS decision in my favour perhaps you would like to reconsider your position before i instigate court proceedings to recover compensation for the stress, hassle & financial hardship your company has caused me during the last two years, i would like you to take into consideration these factors.

 

 

 

 

  1. I have spent aprox 20 hours dealing with this case during the past 2 years, writing emails & making telephone calls to O2 & visiting my bank branch on several occasions. This has been an extremely arduous task due to the belligerent way that O2 have behaved over a paltry £29, it has caused me sleepless nights & a great deal of stress whilst i tried to persuade them they were mistaken. Even to this day they have accepted not one word of what i have said to be the truth.
  2. This case has caused me & my family a great deal of stress due to the effect on our credit file as well as ongoing financial difficulties.
  3. My credit file is apart from the O2 default in very good standing, therefore the difficulties i have experienced during these past two years are almost certainly due entirely to O2’s erroneous default. I would be more than happy for yourselves or any third party to verify this.
  4. I have been refused credit on two occasions for credit cards during this period causing me a great deal of embarrassment & no doubt further damaging my credit score, I have had to accept a loan for a car at 14.1% as opposed to the industry best buy at the time of 5.9% for a loan of £15000 over 4 years, which alone has cost me an additional £3000 in interest. I have also been unable to remortgage during this period due to the unfair credit default, again costing me a great deal of money & stress.

 

 

I should point out if i am forced to seek redress through the small claims court i shall seek the maximum compensation allowed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any comments gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update on my case, after 2 years in which O2 still have not budged from there position I have finally heard from the FOS & they have found in my favour. Before I accept the FOS decision I wanted to see if you guys think I am right to push for more compensation though because the FOS have suggested £75 which as far as I am concerned is laughable.

Here is the contents of an email I have just fired off to O2 before commencing small claims action, What do you think?

 

 

 

Thank you once again for the absolute professionalism with which your company have dealt with my complaint. I thought perhaps i should advise you that the FOS have not been so vehement in there support of your decision, in fact they are in agreement with my position & it is now clear that not only did you give the debt recovery company the wrong account information, you were you sending emails to the wrong person regarding this debt!

 

 

Now that I have the FOS decision in my favour perhaps you would like to reconsider your position before i instigate court proceedings to recover compensation for the stress, hassle & financial hardship your company has caused me during the last two years, i would like you to take into consideration these factors.

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I have spent aprox 20 hours dealing with this case during the past 2 years, writing emails & making telephone calls to O2 & visiting my bank branch on several occasions. This has been an extremely arduous task due to the belligerent way that O2 have behaved over a paltry £29, it has caused me sleepless nights & a great deal of stress whilst i tried to persuade them they were mistaken. Even to this day they have accepted not one word of what i have said to be the truth.
  2. This case has caused me & my family a great deal of stress due to the effect on our credit file as well as ongoing financial difficulties.
  3. My credit file is apart from the O2 default in very good standing, therefore the difficulties i have experienced during these past two years are almost certainly due entirely to O2’s erroneous default. I would be more than happy for yourselves or any third party to verify this.
  4. I have been refused credit on two occasions for credit cards during this period causing me a great deal of embarrassment & no doubt further damaging my credit score, I have had to accept a loan for a car at 14.1% as opposed to the industry best buy at the time of 5.9% for a loan of £15000 over 4 years, which alone has cost me an additional £3000 in interest. I have also been unable to remortgage during this period due to the unfair credit default, again costing me a great deal of money & stress.

 

 

 

I should point out if i am forced to seek redress through the small claims court i shall seek the maximum compensation allowed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any comments gratefully received.

 

 

It's worth putting the provable financial losses in an Letter Before Action.

 

 

Listing the losses with provable financial loss, amount etc.

 

 

List what you require from O2 to redress the loss and what you require for the stress/anxiety/ time and costs in dealing with this.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just thought I would provide a final update upon my case being concluded.

 

The financial ombudsmen found in my favour against O2

but rejected my appeal for additional losses due to the default on my credit file.

 

 

I reluctantly accepted the ombudsman's offer as I am fast approaching house sale/mortgage application scenario.

 

 

the ombudsman gave O2 28 days in which to action their recommendations,

namely default removed & £75 compensation,

 

 

the 28 days came & went & still no action on the default

 

 

the cheque arrived on the 28th day but it was apparently for a refund due to my account being in credit on closing!!!

 

I once again had to contact the ombudsman regarding the default

& was advised O2 would be given a further 14 days to comply with the recommendation before further action was taken,

 

 

the default was finally removed a few days ago & my credit score changed immediately from 452 (fair) to 999 (excellent)

which should now allow me access to the best credit options available.

 

So a full 27 months later I have won my battle with O2,

 

 

I cant help feeling its a bitter sweet victory as companies such as these are not going to be deterred from these reckless actions

by a paltry £75 loss so they will continue to mistreat their customers until such time as the ombudsman

take meaningful action against them.

 

 

I know they have to pay the ombudsman for the investigation also

 

 

but they should be punished sufficiently to make them think twice before placing defaults recklessly on peoples lives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...