Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Llowell/BW legal claim form old jd williams debt for £310


claire99991
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

yesterday i recieved a letter from northampton court saying i had 14 days to reply with my admission

or denial at a jd williams debt for 310 pounds.

 

This catalouge debt is about 5years old and is mostly charges

 

a couple of years ago i got letters from several debt collectors inc llowell

 

i sent back proof it letters with the pound postsl orders

 

no one came back with anything and

all went quiet until the court letters

 

it wants my employers details income outgoings etc..

 

...i could really do without a ccj!!

 

Should i contact llowell and ask them to set up a payment plan?

 

Do i tell the court ive done this?

 

I only work 16 hours per week and with 2 kids i can set up payment plan.

 

Never had a court letter so dont understand it all.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Claire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have moved your thread to the legal forum in view of the issue of court papers.

 

Can you tell us the date of issue as printed on the claim form and also type up the particulars of claim verbatim but without anything that could personally identify you.

 

Hi

issue date 19th feb but recieved today

 

.....its for jd williams catalouge for 310 pounds plus court fees...

 

. Have no idea what to do with it.

 

How do i go forward is it possible to set up payment arrangments without getting a ccj now

 

or am i going to get one anyway?

 

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

'the claimant's claim is for the sum of 390.21 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant

under a mail order agreement regulated by the consumer cedit act 1974

between the defendnt and jd williams under the account ref *********

and assigned to the claiment on the 20/12/2012

 

notice of which has been given to the defendent,

 

the defendet failed to maintain the payment under the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

the claim also includes intrest to section 69 of the county courts act at a rate of 8.00%

 

catalouge was taken out roughly 5 and half years ago. (most of this amount is charges)

 

where do i go from here

 

im loosing sleep over this

 

i really dont want a ccj and

 

just need to know if me contacting lowell

 

and setting up oayment arrangments is enough to stop this going any further.

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you make an arrangement to pay, and they accept, from what i have read they will still continue with the claim unless they can say they will discontinue with the claim, but you will need that in writing....do not phone lowell or carter do everything in writing, that way you have a written record send all letters recorded delivery.

 

At the moment, I and quite a few others have also received claims from Carters/ Lowells they send these out like confetti.

 

Personally i am not worried about the claim, as they have failed to produce the documents they are relying on to take this to court.

 

when they send the claims out, they hope that the individual will just pay what they are after, what they don`t like is when the defendants stands up to defend the claims.

Lowells and carters send these claims out without checking whether they are right or wrong. meaning they dont have the correct paperwork in place when the claim is issued.

 

 

You have the following timescale to go with, You have 33 days in total subject to how you decide to proceed.

5 days from date of claim for the claim to be deemed served so 28 remaining ...14 to Acknowledge service and if defending a further 14 to submit a defence.

first thing you need to do is acknowledge the claim online http://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk there is password on the claim form to use for this.

when you do the acknowledgement tick that you want to defend all ( if you do) and do not tick the jurisdiction.

 

hope that helps

 

Lets

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send the CCA Requestlink3.gif to whoever has sent you the Court papers.

 

You also need to send the CPR31.14 to the same people, asking for

a) Agreement

b) Default notice

c) NOA

d) How the debt is made up

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...redit-Act-1974

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...as-been-issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send the CCA Requestlink3.gif to whoever has sent you the Court papers.

 

You also need to send the CPR31.14 to the same people, asking for

a) Agreement

b) Default notice

c) NOA

d) How the debt is made up

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...redit-Act-1974

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...as-been-issued.

 

 

 

Ok

 

I may as well defend it if they are going to give me a ccj anyway??

 

This debt has been passed around a handful of dca's and

 

when I've sent cca requests nothing comes back

all goes quiet for a while and

then another crops up.

 

I'll acknowledge the claim defend it and

 

send the cca request and

 

other kettle mentioned recorded delivery to Lowell tomorrow?

 

Thank you will keep this updated x

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a CPR & A CCA request.

 

do not sign the letters

get a hold of your credit file too

 

does this show?

 

I notice several previous threads involving JDW cat debts.

 

have you ever sent them and SAR?

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i registered on the website to acknowledge the claim online, i clicked i wanted to defend it says what are my reasons for defence, what should i out in the box or have i clicked on the wrong part? i havent submitted yet as not sure what to put, other letters have been posted to llowel and bw legal.

 

any advice be great never done this before.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are just acknowledging at this stage you submit your defence at 28 days.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are just acknowledging at this stage you submit your defence at 28 days.

 

Hi i registered on the website to acknowledge the claim online, i clicked i wanted to defend it says what are my reasons for defence, what should i out in the box or have i clicked on the wrong part? i havent submitted yet as not sure what to put, other letters have been posted to llowel and bw legal.

 

any advice be great never done this before.

 

thanks

Hi I'm in exactly to same position! So keeping eyes on your progress and following advice given on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...