Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you honeybee if you would my head is mashed now. You guys our savers.  H
    • You can edit the answers to be in red or would you like me to do it? HB
    • Apologies dx100uk  I did not put the answers in red  Thank you all for your patience. H
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton  Name of the Claimant ? Overdales solicitors  How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  13 may 2024 What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account 4546384809766042. The defendant faild to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. The dbt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?   Not to my knowledge. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  Online but it was for a smaller amount they kept on increasing this with me asking Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  It was assigned to a debt collection agency  Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  Yes I also made offers to pay original creditor a smaller amount but was not replied to Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant and got a less paid job I also spent some time on furlough during covid and spent some 3 months on ssp off work. What was the date of your last payment?  May 2021 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes at the time I communicated with all my creditor's that I was running out of funds to pay the original agreements once my redundancy money ran out that was when my accounts defaulted. I then wrote to all my creditor's with pro rata offers of payments but debt collectors took over the accounts.
    • Just an update for all. I received about a letter every other week, increasing in threat levels. Then I hadn't had one for a about two weeks, then Saturday received a carbon copy of the very first letter they sent me in February. Made me laugh, rinse and repeat. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ANPR Preston H&S Litigation services - claim form received? **Won at POPLA**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi esmerobbo

 

How do i PM you ?

 

I'll send you my appeal with photos etc

 

And scans of the invoices, ticket and letters

 

Thanks

 

While PM's are not the way we like to deal with things, you click the users name and this takes you to their profile. You can message from there.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry me again I've went to PM esmerobbo

Dont see any way of attaching docs or scans Managed to do it on here with Go Advanced

 

Cant see that option sorry for being thick

 

ta

 

 

Jus upload them to somewhere like photobucket and send the link by pm.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear oh dear ANPR have given you a code XXX3193ZZZ todays code would be XXX3483ZZZ that is 29 days POPLA has timed out.

 

I have looked over your POPLA appeal it waffles a bit but you hit all the points to win.

 

However POPLA won't accept it!

 

You have the dated letter and the envelope with the post date to prove they have been deceitful it needs to be brought to the BPA's and the DVLA's attention that this company is acting way out of line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

You have left a few personal details within the above attachments so i have unapproved them for now. Once you have covered up your name and address and reference numbers, repost and I (or one of the team) will check to make sure all is ok.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes that was my thoughs .I'll copy the ANPR letter with the popla code on it and send that as well, pointing out the ANPR way of doning things !maybe they'll be full of christmas cheer and allow it .If not they'll be full of Something else

 

I've see some of these rejection letter's from ANPR with the code disguised as a verification number to contact ANPR with ..But they seem to be sending the rejection letter with nothing now

 

No doubt the POPLA drones will be on "Computer says no"

 

Any one got names to complain to at BPA and DVLA

 

I suppose after that it's sit back and wait ,Should i be writing to ANPR to tell them put up or shut up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah you will win at POPLA with the genuine loss, I had a quick look on street view at the location is it were the Barclays bank is? If so it must be a honey pot for them especially when they were allowed to clamp. The signs are up on the first floor walls.

 

DVLA : [email protected]

 

BPA: [email protected] = Steve Clark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt worry about whether you win or not, it is the Code of Practice being followed that is important, you have done the right thing and they havent. That will count for a lot should the goons actually want to take it further and I dont think they will as it would be financial suicide so start issuing CC summonses after committing fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wont need to win, and if I was a betting man I would wager that they just drop this. If they were stupid enough to go near a court with this I suspect their representative would be going home with one more backside then they arrived at court with.

 

Remember who you are dealing with these are ex clampers, who in their time have clamped doctors, nurses, delivery vans, and works vans. Who all had a right to be where they where but had to pay to be released. They have simply moved their bullying tactics on to issuing charges.

 

The owner of this company was in the press saying he was going to sue the government for taking away his livelihood, when they banned clamping.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-14586933

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1347597/Clamping-bosss-4m-payout-bid-Government-claiming-new-anti-cowboy-rules-ruin-business.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

On what basis did you appeal to POPLA? Take no notice of their claim that everything is fair and compliant as we know its not, and goes to prove what lies they tell. Go through their points and if there wrong rebut them and send it to POPLA.

 

Your main approach to POPLA should have been the charge not being a genuine loss. However everything else you can add will not cause any harm.

 

Regarding them saying the signs are compliant, having actually seen this car park it does not come anywhere near compliant. The signs still claim to clamp, however they have been known to resign the car park and send the photos to POPLA after the event.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes they have resigned part of it . but they still have a clamping sign on a wall .This was the old sign from the carkpark which they have moved..

 

Did i send you my Appeal by PM ?

 

The point's of my appeal where Not a genuine pre-estimate of loss,the signs are unclear ,they have failed to follow POFA,they hold no contract and lack of response re popla code

 

They are also claiming the charge is fairand listed the running costs of the business salaries,NI for staff ,printing, postage etc etc .They also quoting lots of court cases

 

its worth looking at

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...