Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
    • Here's a suggested modified version for consideration by the team. (Not sure whether it still gives too much away?)   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you added. Shall we raise the related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding parking periods. Especially with no consideration of section 13 in your own trade association's code of practice and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked, unmanaged over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the above issues and more, with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture a couple of useless ANPR photos. If you insist on continuing this stupid, money grabbing quest, after having all of the above pointed out, we will of course show this letter to the Judge and request “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Signed, "Spot". (Vehicle Keeper's pet Dalmation).
    • Paying DCA's one penny, never mind £50 per month is a mugs game, they have really been milking him as a cash cow   See where received a claim form is underlined in your post, you need to click, on that and read carefully, then answer the questions, then copy and paste into a post on this thread Forget the CAB ,  their advice is sometimes weird. Is it worth defending? Lowell brought these debts for 10 p in the pound , years ago, because they are flawed. Think about it! if it was such an easy win, Capital one could have taken it to court and crushed him.  It could be an invalid agreement, default notice, or many other things. In a nutshell , yes, and we can help you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Speeding ticket but I was out of country


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just received a Speeding ticket notice through the post which was taken from a Temporary camera. I was out of the country during those dates and have tickets and visa stamps to prove the same. Three people had access to my car when I was away and all three of them are denying driving the car at that time.

 

Will I have to take the speeding ticket or can I ask for a photo to see who it looks like. Will the photo normally show the face?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that you should provide photocopied evidence to the police to prove you were out of the country and so could not have been driving, and accompany this with the names and addresses of the 3 people with access to your car and a simple statement that they are each denying being the driver and, since you were not present, you are unable to assist any further.

 

I do have direct experience of a similar situation and proof of being out of the country was accepted as a good reason not to name the offending driver. I believe the police are not obliged to provide photos before the case reaches court, though they may do if asked, however in my case they didn't help anyway since the photo was of the back of the car and the headrests effectively obscured the driver and any passengers.

 

It may be worth one last try at the three potential drivers by telling them you're not taking the hit so you're giving all three names to the police and letting them sort it out. This worked for us - the actual driver was so scared of getting extra points for causing hassle (don't know if they do or not, but the threat worked!) that they owned up.

 

Please wait for further advice from one of the many experienced motoring issues people, but since you could not possibly be driving I don't believe you could accept the ticket anyway and could end up getting done for perjury if you tried - like that MP and his wife!

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would follow RMW's advice.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that you should provide photocopied evidence to the police to prove you were out of the country and so could not have been driving, and accompany this with the names and addresses of the 3 people with access to your car and a simple statement that they are each denying being the driver and, since you were not present, you are unable to assist any further.

 

I do have direct experience of a similar situation and proof of being out of the country was accepted as a good reason not to name the offending driver. I believe the police are not obliged to provide photos before the case reaches court, though they may do if asked, however in my case they didn't help anyway since the photo was of the back of the car and the headrests effectively obscured the driver and any passengers.

 

It may be worth one last try at the three potential drivers by telling them you're not taking the hit so you're giving all three names to the police and letting them sort it out. This worked for us - the actual driver was so scared of getting extra points for causing hassle (don't know if they do or not, but the threat worked!) that they owned up.

 

Please wait for further advice from one of the many experienced motoring issues people, but since you could not possibly be driving I don't believe you could accept the ticket anyway and could end up getting done for perjury if you tried - like that MP and his wife!

 

Thanks for the detailed advice and thank you. Will speak with the other 3 and warn them. Update here

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they had insurance to drive it?

 

else it could be more than a speeding ticket....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they had insurance to drive it?

 

else it could be more than a speeding ticket....

 

dx

 

Worse still one of the guys was from abroad who only has a International drivers licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am certainly not advocating any attempt to evade the law, however when contacting the police be very, very careful when giving any information about who you had given permission to use your vehicle since you wouldn't want them to think you knowingly allowed someone to drive your vehicle without the necessary insurance or licence. I have a feeling that not asking if they were licensed/insured wouldn't get you out of it either.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am certainly not advocating any attempt to evade the law, however when contacting the police be very, very careful when giving any information about who you had given permission to use your vehicle since you wouldn't want them to think you knowingly allowed someone to drive your vehicle without the necessary insurance or licence. I have a feeling that not asking if they were licensed/insured wouldn't get you out of it either.

 

Surely I can't get in trouble for this. Is that a punishable offence? Isn't it up to driver to make sure he has cover in place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you have Visa stamps.

Do these confirm the dates of actual entry/exit?

 

Although no longer needing Visas, I live in a country that stamps every passport at every border crossing, in or out.

Great proof for HMRC and others, but it doesn't happen within 2,000 miles of UK or many places beyond.

 

Supplementary proof could be credit card and bancomat transaction slips or account could be useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you have Visa stamps.

Do these confirm the dates of actual entry/exit?

 

Although no longer needing Visas, I live in a country that stamps every passport at every border crossing, in or out.

Great proof for HMRC and others, but it doesn't happen within 2,000 miles of UK or many places beyond.

 

Supplementary proof could be credit card and bancomat transaction slips or account could be useful.

 

 

Yeah it was to USA so they stamped my passport + I have airline tickets/boarding passes/credit card spend. They would have not doubts that I was not here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely I can't get in trouble for this. Is that a punishable offence? Isn't it up to driver to make sure he has cover in place?

It's an offence to cause or permit another person to drive without insurance.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/143

 

The penalty is the same as for driving without insurance yourself - 6-8 points and a hefty fine. If you're not sure whether the people you permit to drive your car have insurance, now would be a good time to find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of interest what would happen to a foreign driver who gets a speeding fine? No points I guess and he would just pay the fine?

If he doesn't have a UK licence the DVLA can set up a ghost licence to keep track of his points, and he can be banned from driving in the UK i(but not his home country) if he gets 12. However if he's only a short term visitor rather than a long term resident he may well not be prosecuted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he doesn't have a UK licence the DVLA can set up a ghost licence to keep track of his points, and he can be banned from driving in the UK i(but not his home country) if he gets 12. However if he's only a short term visitor rather than a long term resident he may well not be prosecuted.

 

Thanks for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I opened that canof worms but.

 

as pointed out

 

it MIGHT be better for you to cough, for you and them in the long run.

 

if they had no valid licence/insurance etc etc

 

taking the hit on the speeding might be cheaper and less points for you.

 

as apposed to letting it run and anything 'nasty' being found out.

 

sadly, I know someone local that had exactly the same happen.

 

it transpired the driver was only a provisional.

 

they got points [ eventually as the RK refused to tell who was driving till it had already been to court once to protect his 'mate']

 

it was a choice of his mate got a twok as well or he said he knew he was using the vehicle.

 

he got a fine for knowing the driver was a provo & ofcourse his insurance has gone skyhigh too.

 

think about that one too.

 

hope you get it sorted

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I opened that canof worms but.

 

as pointed out

 

it MIGHT be better for you to cough, for you and them in the long run.

 

if they had no valid licence/insurance etc etc

 

taking the hit on the speeding might be cheaper and less points for you.

 

as apposed to letting it run and anything 'nasty' being found out.

 

sadly, I know someone local that had exactly the same happen.

 

it transpired the driver was only a provisional.

 

they got points [ eventually as the RK refused to tell who was driving till it had already been to court once to protect his 'mate']

 

it was a choice of his mate got a twok as well or he said he knew he was using the vehicle.

 

he got a fine for knowing the driver was a provo & ofcourse his insurance has gone skyhigh too.

 

think about that one too.

 

hope you get it sorted

 

dx

 

Interesting.

 

So would anyone know if a verbal confirmation of insurance is enough or do I need to check it?

 

How would one check if a cover note is valid anyway as the call centre reps won't speak with you due to data protection.

 

Now days most people are covered 3rd party anyway through their own insurance

 

so if someone tells me they are covered and then turns out to not be can I be held liable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't assume 3rd party covers driving other peoples cars

http://www.yourdrivinglicence.co.uk/driving-someone-elses-vehicle.html

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now days most people are covered 3rd party anyway through their own insurance

Not necessarily - in days gone by third party driving other cars cover was fairly standard, but as insurers squeeze costs more and more are removing it. Additionally not everybody owns or insures their a car themselves, and for foreign resident an insurance policy issued abroad will almost never cover him to drive a UK registered car in Britain.

 

so if someone tells me they are covered and then turns out to not be can I be held liable?
Potentially, yes. No insurance is a strict liability offence so the fact that you believed he was insured wouldn't be a defence. If you could show you'd taken reasonable steps to ensure that he was insured but you were deceived then a court would probably find that there were special reasons not to endorse your licence, if it got that far, but if the conversation went something like "You are insured, aren't you?", "Oh yes (nudge nudge wink wink)" they might not consider those to be reasonable steps.

 

Apart from the criminal offence of permitting no insurance, if you allow an uninsured person to use your car and they cause an accident then under s151 of the Road Traffic Act the insurance company must still pay out to third parties, but they can then come after YOU for the money they pay out. If someone causes a serious accident, this could potentially leave you with a bill for many thousands of pounds. So if you are allowing other people to drive your car, by far the safest thing is to add them as named drivers to your own insurance policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tricky. If I say it was me when it clearly wasn't I can be held liable for perjury. If I tell them who was diving I could still get done for no insurance even though I wouldn't have let them drive without my permission if I knowingly knew they didn't have Insurance.

 

No way am I taking a hit on this. Is there a Lawyer who specializes in this sort of stuff? Can anyone recommend one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tricky. If I say it was me when it clearly wasn't I can be held liable for perjury. If I tell them who was diving I could still get done for no insurance even though I wouldn't have let them drive without my permission if I knowingly knew they didn't have Insurance.

 

No way am I taking a hit on this. Is there a Lawyer who specializes in this sort of stuff? Can anyone recommend one?

 

Hello there.

 

Plenty of lawyers specialise in motor advice, a member of my family works for one. We're not able to recommend firms under CAG rules. Have a look at the Law Society website for motor specialists in your area. Or you could google.

 

Make sure you get a specialist though and then maybe talk to them on the phone to gauge whether you could work with them. They should be able to give you an idea of the cost, I would think.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you do that, did you give any of them permission to drive while you were out of the country or was it a case of leaving the keys on the hall table ?

 

Case of leaving keys on the table.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is in line with the cowboys running or should i say ...ruining...shopping at Asda. more people are complaining about the company 'Town & Country Car parks, who have form for ripping off either by wheel clamping or parking charges.

The main complaint is ...Threat!...people get letters saying they overstayed their time and if they don't pay up in 7 days the fine will double. Asda say it's out of their hands and complaints must be taken up with T&C themselves, but getting through to them is impossible i'm told. A quick look on the net will tell you the horror stories about this unsavoury bunch, and any letters from them should be ignored. They can't carry out their threats...just bin the letters and forget it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is in line with the cowboys running or should i say ...ruining...shopping at Asda. more people are complaining about the company 'Town & Country Car parks, who have form for ripping off either by wheel clamping or parking charges.

The main complaint is ...Threat!...people get letters saying they overstayed their time and if they don't pay up in 7 days the fine will double. Asda say it's out of their hands and complaints must be taken up with T&C themselves, but getting through to them is impossible i'm told. A quick look on the net will tell you the horror stories about this unsavoury bunch, and any letters from them should be ignored. They can't carry out their threats...just bin the letters and forget it.

 

 

urm wrong thread?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...