Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • There is a plea guilty website...   Screenshot 2024-05-22 144200.pdf
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
    • Fraudsters are increasingly using AI, but are people taking the problem seriously enough?View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Mackenzie Hall Court Forms issued


Inzi92
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's always best to avoid court IF an agreement can be reached and IF/ONCE you are happy with the figures. Or costs may increase.

 

However, so as not tio let them win by default you must adhere to the dates (service + 14 days to acknowledge, + 14 days to submit defence).

 

But you can continue on both paths (defending in full but with a view to negotiating a settlement before court). During the process you should be able to establish the right figures.

 

The DN - you said you may have received this by e-mail. Do you have a copy?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do think it would be best to try & sort an arrangement with mac hall directly if they will withdraw from court?

 

If I were in your position, I would ask for a breakdown calculation and statement confirming the amount being claimed. If it is shown to be correct, then I would try to negotiate a repayment arrangement, provided they withdrew the court claim. If they did not withdraw the claim, then if I could not pay the full amount within 30 days of any CCJ, then I would request to pay by instalments.

 

This is a fairly recent debt that you have, with the loan being taken out after April 2007. Therefore it would be fairly difficult to defend. They would pretty much just have to evidence the debt being owed by you and they would gain judgement. At some point you will have to make payments. In my eyes it a case of whether you try to avoid the CCJ by negotiating repayment/withdrawal of court claim or accept getting a CCJ, with payment made by instalments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I've spoken to them are they are willing to let me pay over 4 months but no longer. I asked if this would mean they would stop court proceedings and he said yes, it would be put on hold & then if the balance was cleared in the 4 months it would be marked as settled on credit file. At this moment in time I can't quite see how I can physically afford this but I'm going to try & get some help to avoid the ccj. What do you think? Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do NOT agree to anything until you get proof fromt he courts that the court action has stopped. MH are well known for saying one thing, then letting the claim go through so they get default judgement. This means that you have no way to get a set aside and they then ask for enforcement orders. It's easy money for them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do NOT agree to anything until you get proof fromt he courts that the court action has stopped. MH are well known for saying one thing, then letting the claim go through so they get default judgement. This means that you have no way to get a set aside and they then ask for enforcement orders. It's easy money for them.

 

Agree. Get it in writing from Mac Hall first. If 4 months would be a struggle, then ask Mac Hall for a longer period. Make sure MH also confirm that that the court claim will be stopped.

 

Think about how paying MH will affect any other financial commitments that you have. You don't want to agree to something which ends up causing you more difficulty, than having one CCJ which are then repay by instalments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also make sure you respond to the claim form otherwise they will get a dedault judgement that way.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive spoke to MH again and they have said if I pay over 4 months no further action will be taken, however the payments they are asking for still include solicitor fees and court fee? Is this correct? They said that they give 120 days for payment not 30 as it is in there best interest to stop any further action also? Although I feel they are telling me what I want to hear I am still dubious!? They said as soon as I have made first payment they will send me an arrangement agreement however I would like this before I make payment. I have to make the first payment before end of April which isn't a problem, however I was then told If i didn't the arrangement would be in default!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a first payment and then see whether they deliver on what they have said.

 

The Solicitors fee is only relevant to the preparation of the court claim. Yes you would have to pay a reasonable amount for this and the court claim fee.

 

If you don't want to accept what MH are offering, then accept the CCJ and ask to pay by instalments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you recieved court forms? If so, treat it as if the claim is still going ahead. Do NOT believe mucky hall. Contact the courts for updates. Mh will lie through their teeth to get a default judgement, which is exactly what is happening here.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so do I make first installment and then still follow up through court?

 

Yes make the first instalment, but still ackowledge the claim form, otherwise they will get a default CCJ, as the court will do that automatically. You can acknowledge the court claim online and enter that you will defend in full, as debt is being negotiated with MH to avoid wasting the courts time.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. You need to make sure you abide by the rules for the claim form. DOnt let MH trick you into not filling it in. You will also need to file a full defense to force MH's hand.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

File a full defence? I appreciate your help with this. Made first payment today for the amount that was requested. Still not received email outlining arrangement however I will chase this up. They did tell me I didn't need to do anything with forms, however I am taking your advice and submit these tomorrow. If I register online I do not need to submit by post is this correct? Is there anything I should include when doing this? If I carry this out will this still avoid a ccj? Who controls this, is it the court or MH? Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can submit your defence online have you acknowledged service online already ?

 

What was the date of issue of the claim form - top right hand corner of the claim form .

 

You have a timeline..

 

Date of Issue + 5 for service + 14 days to acknowledge service + 14 days extra if you are going to submit a defence (33) days from date of issue to submission of defence.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did tell me I didn't need to do anything with forms

 

Told you they were misleading you and hoping to get a default judgement. That statement 100% guarantees it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just make sure you follow the court time limits. Ignore MH. Keep making payments as they say, but make 100% sure you still follow through filling in the court papers. We can help you with a defense as they are clearly trying to use the courts as a debt collection tool and make a mockery out of the legal system.

 

Get the acknowledgement in, and we can advise on the next steps.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help :-) This will be done first thing in the morning. Do you still think it is possible for me to avoid a ccj? Is the defence in writing or will I need to appear in person?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many ways around a CCJ. With a carefully worded defence, you may even get this case thrown out completely. It's rare, but it can and does happen.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I have now responded. I also contacted the solicitors who the forms that are sent by to make an enquiry to whether they had informed them of an arrangement being set up. I explained they had told me I didnt need to do anything with the forms and he strongly advised against this and said it would gain a default judgement. I asked why I had been told this and he said I cant comment on that, maybe due to lack of legal knowledge!! Its an absolute joke! Whats would you suggest to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you are informed in writing that the arrangement has been accepted and that the claimant has issued a notice of discontinuance then the claim is still live.You must submit a defence...be it a holding defence or a particularised defence...that will pause the process.They can either respond to the defence (within 28 days) or let the claim stay.If they fail to respond then the claim stays only if they respond will an AQ be released which is the next stage of the process and which then allocates the case to your local county court.

 

Hope that clarifies your position.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree! Issued on 19th April. So what happens next?

 

 

In which case you need to have acknowledge the claim, online by Wednesday, 8th of May and submit a defence by 22 May

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive spoken with MH again and they have provided me with arrangement in writing. They have said that as long as the balance is paid in 120 days no further action will be taken. They have said I don't need to submit forms as the would have to instruct their solicitors to move forward with the case, and as long as the arrangement doesnt default in the 120 days this wont happen? The forms are sent from their solicitors and also asks for them to be returned to them too? Surely this wouldnt be the case? The court address is Northampton and he assures me this is for bulk processing address?!? I really am confused with all of this? Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ignore any advice given to you by MH, they are known to be economical with the proverbial, submit the forms and they will have to pay an allocation fee, which they will not like doing - and the case may be overturned with costs awarded to you.

 

I would submit what I call a 'simple defence', just stating the facts to date and putting in the correspondence trail, and state that you reserve the right to amend the defence should it be necessary to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...