Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
    • Believe it or not, fully familiar with the County Court process. My posts were seeking confirmation by asking questions, nothing more as an aid to people who look at this thread in the future. People should not jump to conclusions.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Help - SMI ?


Deb T
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3636 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What is the criteria for climing SMI as in what or where can I find the rules/regulations on a claim?

 

Person has been on IB soon to be ESA for a number of years, 2008 I think. At the time of making a claim they were not able to claim for help with the mortgage because for whatever reason they were barred/didn't meet the criteria/ disallowed.

 

They've met their mortgage payments for the past 4 years with no help from the DWP and it's been a tough hit every month.

 

Have the rules change or are they still in place and much the same as what they were almost 5 years ago?

 

Where can the reaons for disallowing a claim for SMI be found?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Hi, thanks for the link, however it's the criteria set for making the claim I'm looking for as in what bars/disallows you from making a SMI, for one reason or another they were told they could not claim for SMI due to whatever reason, at the time of being told they looked up

to see if this is correct and apparently it was but now roll on 4 years they wanted to see if anything had changed/guidelines updated etc.

 

There are specific rules for claming SMI, just can't find where they are.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think if you could help us by giving us the reasons claim was dissallowed it may help us to help you....at the moment we can only give you the links both of which are saying roughly the same thing...you have to be claiming certain benefits etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reaons for the claim being disallowed have long since been forgotten .. there is a particular path you need to be able to follow to be able to make a successful claim to SMI, last outing they were barred from doing so due to not satisfying certain criteria (they were on benefits then and are on benefits now in that sense nothing has changed.) The question as to their eligibilty due to the various benefits they're on is not what I'm asking.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Can anyone point me to the rules surrounding a claimant on ESA making a claim for help with mortgage interest.

 

Essentially, they have been paying the full mortgage inclusive of interest for the past 8 or 9 years,

the last 6 has been while in receipt of Incapacity Benefit and now EAS (Unfit for work) and the other partner is their registered carer.

 

For one reason or another I think they fell foul of the mortgage rules for interest payments

and so have been paying the mortgage in full ...so no help at all from the DWP.

 

Mortgage rates are looking like they're soon to be on the increase again

and as some of their benefits have suffered/reduced over the past couple of years due to the cuts

it's getting to the point where they are paying the mortgage at expense of other of their essentials.

 

The property was part of a dispute, the claimant owed the property outright but only after paying off another owner to get them out of the equation.

 

A court battled ensued resulting in three years of their lives being taken over by legal fees (approx 35k) .

 

In the end the property was transferred to the claimant (they were not on benefits at the time) .

.but at that point they were up to their eyeballs in legal fees so

 

the partner of the claimant sourced a mortgage on the property which then paid off the fees/got some remedial work sorted

and paid off other debts of which most had come about from robbing peter to pay paul when legal fees kept coming.

 

At the point of the mortgage being sourced the owner and now claimant gave their entire share to their partner (on paper and through solicitors)

 

Roll on 3 years after the mortgage was sorted and the claimant and now not an owner had an life changing accident

with the result they were incapacitated to a fair degree,

 

after a time the partner left work due to childcare and they made a joint claim.

 

At the time they were advised and did their own research (not by the DWP)

that they would not qualify for Mortgage interest and so didn't make the claim.

 

From the above is it fair to say that nothing has changed and that the rules are still just the same

(save for the introduction of two year smi on job-seekers allowance )

 

Silly thing is, if they were to move into rented accommodating they could claim towards the rent

and which would be considerably more than any current mortgage interest payment..so in theory would cost the dwp more.

 

Any advice/help/guidelines pointed to would be much appreciated.

 

Deb T

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it mortgage interest is only paid on any part of the mortgage that is for purchase of the property. So any repairs, payment of debts, legal fees etc wouldn't qualify.

 

I guess it may be worth applying but I doubt they'd get anything.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that is where the difficulty lies, the partner took out the mortgage ...but it was a first time mortgage, there was not one on the property and upon

signing for the mortgage the equity in it's entirety was transferred out of the one partners name and into the other. So although the claimant had the

money it wasn't a second mortgage as there wasn't one on it in the first place etc.

 

Any links to the rules/guidelines if anyone has them would be appreciated.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of have the same issue

 

though I believe repairs , and thus a mortgage for that shortly after the time of purchase qualify.

 

I've been refused twice now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of have the same issue

 

though I believe repairs , and thus a mortgage for that shortly after the time of purchase qualify.

 

I've been refused twice now

 

Some repairs maybe.

 

https://www.gov.uk/support-for-mortgage-interest/overview

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx --

 

- re when you applied, what info did they require from you?

 

This is over 7 years ago,

 

paperwork for that time is no long available

 

i dong think as in the claimants various details and solicitor stuff have long since hit the shredder

 

Was it an involved process

 

and when they refused you was it in timely manner or did it take a long time?

 

 

Caro: thanks for the link, I've seen that one but there is another one re what may qualify/disqualify you from assistance, I just cant find it.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2012

 

the form was the MI12 10/11

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you sure the paperwork is not available?

I bet an sar will get all you require

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they have the mortgage details but the solicitor papwerwork dealing with the court issues and surrounding mortgage application are long since gone I think...the broker at the time is no longer in business.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: Deb T:

 

A recipient of incapacity benefit wouldn't have been eligible for State help with payment of a mortgage unless the award was topped up with income support. Support for mortgage interest isn't available to recipients of wholly contributions based awards of employment n support either.

 

Sorry, from what you've written I can't work out who the mortgagor is. But to be in with a chance of support for mortgage interest one of the partners needs to be in receipt of an income related benefit. Either some income related ESA claimed by the disabled partner, or a top up of income support for the carer.

 

Support for mortgage interest can only be claimed to help with interest payments on mortgages and interest payments on loans for improvements or repairs to the property. If the recipient of ESA, or partner, decides to claim support for mortgage interest the initial enquiry needs to be made to Jobcentreplus. A subject access request to the mortgagee should secure details of the mortgage and the application for it. The court where the dispute was heard should be able to source a record of the case and the outcome, even if the transcripts are no longer available.

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the above Margaret, sorry if what I've posted has confused you: To clarify a little better

 

Assume that the claimant/partner between them are in receipt of the benefits that allow them to at least make the claim for mortgage relief, no problem with that. It is the rules/guidelines as to what may allow/disallow a claim when making the application i.e the criteria set by the DWP when considering any claim.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...