Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If it is MCB    National Fraud Database Members | Preventing Fraud Losses | Cifas WWW.CIFAS.ORG.UK A range of organisations use the National Fraud Database to share data on confirmed fraud cases, preventing over £1 billion in fraud losses every year.   They are on the register  
    • Hi @LilMissM   I guess you could call me our resident CIFAS Specialist - Personally have been through all of what you have and now have come out the other side when my marker fell off in May 2023. For a start Monzo may close your account but as I had a Marker for App Fraud (Vodafone ended up making a whole hoohah of the account I had with them) - I was with them and still am from Oct 2017 till today. And not once did they close my account. I actually spoke to a couple of current account providers at the time that I had accounts with - Nationwide and Barclays - Told them what was going on and provided all the evidence to them. They advised they may do so but it was highly unlikely now that they understood why it happened and what I was doing to fight it.    Anyway - On to your marker. MCB is My Community Bank?  I can say to you that on experience that On Monday you can be on top of the world then on Tuesday you whole life changes in a flash of an eye. Suddenly you cant pay your bills, Work isnt feasible and you are left with no other choice but to scrape by.  If this has happened to you, then join the club.  - Why is this important? Well Financial institutions get one whiff of potential fraud and you are guilty without a chance to respond. You found out the hard way   If it sounds like I'm waffling, I'm not - Its important to your issue. They have deemed you guilty by the fact that no payments have been made and potentially entered into a loan agreement knowing looking not to pay (Although thats how it may appear, there will always be factors against that)    First off - Questions - What Category of Marker do you have? If unsure, check my signature for a Credit File Guide which will tell you all you need to know about what Categories apply.  - When did you raise the complaint? They will have 8 weeks to respond. More on this in a mo.  - Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan?   My next suggestions, Send this complaint to the CEOs office - CEOEMAIL.COM Let them make the decision as per the Complaint Procedure. Then if they refuse to remove the marker. take it to the FOS who can force the company to remove it if found in favour.  Some companies do need a slap or 2 once in a while to bring them down a peg. You could be looking at this right now.   
    • Other case law relied upon " On other record of reasons "
    • Page 2 – document 10 and 11 – you should include the fact that it is a Law reform commission report. Best to give it its full name if you can I suggest that you move paragraph 10 up to the first position – paragraph 5 and move everything down. I think other than that – it is good to go. I suggest you don't bother to do any more drafts. Simply rearrange the paragraphs as I suggested above then the title of the documents that you are relying on in the index page. Send it off and post your final version here so that everybody can see. I'm sorry about the delay. Thanks for reminding me
    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA WRAG sanctions/work programme


Butterfly9
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4139 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm writing on behalf of my partner.

Cut a long story short, he is on ESA WRAG (IR) for severe depression and anxiety. He has been claiming for just under 3 years now, he has failed all 3 medicals, but succesfully gained enough points at tribunal to be awared ESA. (with the help of me and his father, and a rep from cab).

 

He is worried sick about the new mandatory work programme and work placements he can be put on, and if he refuses, the sanctions he will face.

We are in no position to be sanctioned, but he is also in no position to be, (well the equivalent) of working full time.

 

My partner is on high dose Anti-D's aswell as going to group therapy twice a week (one is CBT), and counselling once a week. The counselling is 2 hours in the middle of the day (12-2) and it takes an hour transport there and back. The group therapy is 10-4 and takes the same amount of time, if not a bit longer. My partner cannot use public transport on his own without panic/anxiety attacks or just breaking down and wondering around aimlessly. I go to all these appointments with him (luckily they are both close to his parents, so I stay in theirs while he is in the app until it's time to pick him up again.

 

He had been waiting for the counselling and group therapy for over 2 years, they all only started in the last 3-4 months.

 

Partner has been mentally ill since his early childhood, has seen many psychologists/psychiatrists and counsellors, none of which have helped. He has been on many different types of anti-depressants over the cause of about 6-7 years, none of which have made any significant change. He has never worked, never finished a project in his life, left school with no gcse's, attempted college courses but never completed any. When he fails something (which is often), this spirals him into a very dark place. One were he secretly plans his own suicide etc. Not one that is pleasant.

 

My main concern is, if he put on a work programme or work placement, what will they do about the app my partner has throughout the week? Will they make him stop these appointments? He finds the counselling/group therapy VERY stressful, so having to 'work' every day, when he isn't at his appointments also worries me, as he needs a day off.

I'm not sure how my partner is expected to get to the job center on his own, nevermind work programmes and work placements?

 

Partners doctor is quite helpful, though, and I, aswell as him, beleive my partner COULD get into work, with the right help, and slowly into it, however being forced into something like this, is not something I think will help him in the slightest, and I worry it will put him back in that dark place. Dr is convinced we are stretching the truth, and it will not be as bad as we say it will be (and many others saying it will be). I'm very worried of my partners wellbeing.

And I doubt he will ever make the support group. Any advice?

 

Sorry in advance, I'm both tired and very stressed.

Edited by Butterfly9
Link to post
Share on other sites

The work program should rearrange any appointments they book with your partner if it clashes with medical appointments but I would say that you should keep written proof of any appointments that you have booked so that they have no grounds to refer to DMA.

If a sanction isimposed it ias the personal allowance that is sanctioned.

If the work program see your partner and agree that is unlikely that he would be "job ready" within the 2 years they may even forget about him as they would be extremely unlikely to receive the bonus payment for getting him back to work before he is due to finish the program iygwim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understand, and in direct contrast to what IDS is absurdly trying to tell people, the WPs get £600 every time someone like your partner is referred to them. That'll be the main point of the exercise here I would think, to get that money out of the public purse and into private coffers where the businesses involved and IDS, Grayling, Miller, Freud, McVey, Black, Hoban etc can divvy it up later, this before the whole concept gets (in my view) correctly perceived as the [problem] it is and is closed down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as swl states this is simply an exercise in redistribution of money from the public purse, give to the rich, at the expense of the poor....i wouldnt worry yourself too much about it...they are more interested in the money and if they find that a person is not going to be financially viable to them then they will soon 'park' them and not bother them...there are various threads devoted to this odious industry and how you can make life awkward for them by withdrawing consent etc...have a read around to get an idea...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the replies, they've been most helpful.

 

We have both been waiting since the 3rd for a letter from them, every day when post arrives, speaking for myself, I just feel awful, I know the day will come and I just don't know how my other half will deal with it.

 

d4g could you perhaps link me up to this thread you speak of? I can see a lot of ATOS/ESA threads but don't seem to be able to spot the particular one you are referring to.

 

I have my own personal reasons why I hate ATOS and the majority of the horrible private companies boasting how they are helping 'scrounchers' into work.

 

Counting down the days to being able to kick these morons (for a less offensive term) out of power!

 

Thank you again, I feel less like I am about to have a mental break down, god only knows what other half is feeling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the replies. Husband has received his first interview at the job center on the 16th January. I'm glad we can enjoy Christmas, but worried sick what they will do.

Husband is beside himself with stress worry and anxiety. Sigh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the replies. Husband has received his first interview at the job center on the 16th January. I'm glad we can enjoy Christmas, but worried sick what they will do.

Husband is beside himself with stress worry and anxiety. Sigh.

I had my first last week and I have been told it will be EIGHTEEN months before they will ask me for other please do not worried like I was but it went OK

Have a nice x-mas

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had my first last week and I have been told it will be EIGHTEEN months before they will ask me for other please do not worried like I was but it went OK

Have a nice x-mas

 

Wow! I guess you are lucky then. Suppose it depends on the illness? Husband was asked to go to interviews when he first applied for ESA, but they never MADE him do anything, just asked what he would like to be doing in the future, and if he wants further help to call them etc.

 

Hope you have a nice Xmas too!

Edited by Butterfly9
forgot to wish them a nice Xmas too!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! I guess you are lucky then. Suppose it depends on the illness? Husband was asked to go to interviews when he first applied for ESA, but they never MADE him do anything, just asked what he would like to be doing in the future, and if he wants further help to call them etc.

 

Hope you have a nice Xmas too!

Yes it is all on your medical condition but more then it is depend on jc+ staff is well

I read it some where that they ask for volt. work i.e cleaning parks etc but as I was worried sick until I went to jc+

Lots of confusing with E.S.A and all other benefits no one knows the full system or how it works I think that what gov. wants so no one can abuse the system

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is all on your medical condition but more then it is depend on jc+ staff is well

I read it some where that they ask for volt. work i.e cleaning parks etc but as I was worried sick until I went to jc+

Lots of confusing with E.S.A and all other benefits no one knows the full system or how it works I think that what gov. wants so no one can abuse the system

 

Yeah the voluntry thing is no longer voluntry, it's mandatory, and it's what my husband is worried sick over. Whether it's cleaning up parks or working at a charity shop, my husband can barely get out of bed most days, I'm not sure this is the best way to 'help' him into work.. I think it's much more likely to just relapse him into that dark place, I have every faith in him working with the right help, but pushing him into something full time for benefits, and taking them off him if he can't do it, just seems to be free labour for companies, charity or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The work program should rearrange any appointments they book with your partner if it clashes with medical appointments but I would say that you should keep written proof of any appointments that you have booked so that they have no grounds to refer to DMA.

If a sanction isimposed it ias the personal allowance that is sanctioned.

If the work program see your partner and agree that is unlikely that he would be "job ready" within the 2 years they may even forget about him as they would be extremely unlikely to receive the bonus payment for getting him back to work before he is due to finish the program iygwim?

 

your recent comments scare me, am I right now that anyone who is able to attend an interview is going to be reffered? or will they just pick a few out. If its automatic refferal then this is just JSA mark II pretending to be supporting the sick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your recent comments scare me, am I right now that anyone who is able to attend an interview is going to be reffered? or will they just pick a few out. If its automatic refferal then this is just JSA mark II pretending to be supporting the sick.

 

Dear Worried33 Please do read my last post it will help as per my last interview exp. with jc+ went OK

Also do not believe everything what you read lots and lots different situ. in this post not every thing apply to every one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Worried33 Please do read my last post it will help as per my last interview exp. with jc+ went OK

Also do not believe everything what you read lots and lots different situ. in this post not every thing apply to every one

 

was your interview before they changed the system for mandatory work programme?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My OH claims IR couple rate ESA for both of us. He also gets WRAG component.

 

So...

couple rate fortnightly: £222

WRAG component fortnightly: £56

We also get HB & CT, but they are paid directly to them, not to us. We get nothing else.

 

How much will be taken from us if my husband is sanctioned for not going to his Job center appointments? (My hubby is intending to go, but he is ill, it may be the case that he cannot get out of bed that day, and I've seen it happen, good enough reason or not, sanctions are happening). I want to expect the worst so we can be as prepared as possible.

 

I am aware we could apply for hardship payments if this is the case, but I also read that's only 60% of the assessment phase, and you have to apply for it every week? I've also read that it's only for JSA claiments, ESA have no such 'hardship payments'??

 

I understand it's an incentive to get people back into work etc, but my hubby is genuinely ill, having our income taken from us, is not going to help my husband get into work.

 

Thank you in advance, hope you all had a nice Christmas.

Edited by Butterfly9
Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be the personal allowance that is removed but as I'm not a processing officer and don't deal with ESA either I'm not 100% certain if it is the single persons rate or the couple rate that is removed.

The sanction will remain in place until the customer recomplies in the system and thenthere is a fixed period of sanction following the customer recomplying which varies depending if it is a first sanction or subsequent one (1 week for first sanction, 2 weeks for second sanction and third or more is 3 weeks).

A hardship claim can be made on form JSA/ESA10JP if a sanction isimposed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...