Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nothing will happen in regard to this one shoplifting event, other than Sainsburys won't let you shop in this store again.   But, if you continued to shoplift, then the consequences are more serious. Local to me, there  is a town where about 13 people have been banned from shopping in many of the shops. They are subject to some form of order, where if they set foot in any of the stores, they will be subject to arrest by Police.  
    • Agree with DX, Sadly, from the pics, it looks like you're bang to rights😪 The rules are very explicit. Before entering the box, you must ensure that you are able to completely exit. It looks like the car in front may have moved a couple of feet and tempted you to set off, but when you did that, there still wasn't enough room to completely exit the box. By all means ask to see the video evidence, but saying you had to stop because the vehicle in front stopped, isn't a valid defence.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TBI Claimform - Old HFC Loan


gust
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

TS contacted them and this was their reply,

 

We disagree with your ascertain that the reconstituted Agreement provided is not enforceable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. We refer you to section 3 of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices & Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983, which refers to true copies, in particular sub-section (2)(b) which states that the signature. can be omitted from the Agreement.

 

As these regulations came into operation on 19/05/1985, the do apply to the agreement which commenced in mid 2005. defendant also referred to the decision in Carey v-HSBC (2009), which confirms that a true copy could be a reconstituted version of the Agreement.

 

We can only assume that your mistaken belief that agreements entered into before the 7th April 2007

cannot be reconstituted as they would not contain a signature, relates to section 15 of the Consumer

Credit Act 2006 which repealed the “irredeemably unenforceable" provisions in Section 127(3)~(5) of the

Consumer Credit Act 1974 and commenced on the 6”‘ April 2007.

 

 

 

Can some one explain what they are on about and best wording to defend this?

as i thought this would be unenforceable at law due to the dates mentioned above.

 

seems they are trying to mingle to things into one?

 

 

thanks

 

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The 1983 Regulations state what form an agreement must take. The CCA 1974 states what a creditor must send if you request a copy of that agreement. If they fail to do so, the account goes into default until such times as they do. The point of asking for a copy of the agreement is to ascertain whether or not they have an enforceable agreement. Section 77/78 of the CCA 1974 is quite specific about what they must provide you with on request.

 

The Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and copies of Documents) regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1557) is only applicable in conjunction with The Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations) 1983 (SI 1983/1569) and are only applicable to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 sections 58,62,63,63 and 64. Your request is a statutory request made under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 77/78 and therefore the copy of the credit agreement requested must be a true copy of the fully executed agreement

 

It is not unusual for a creditor or DCA to try and bamboozle you with science to cover the fact that they cannot provide the original agreement.:lol:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed my defence on sunday for 18th. Forgot to sign it and write statement of truth on it. They returned it, signed and returned. Now today it was returned again and they say they cant accept it as its in default judgement.

 

What now??? Still havent had re issued court papers with mcol stuff. So getting nowhere

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning Gust

 

Never rains then it pours.....have you received Notice of the Judgment yet? You have a limited time to set a side a Default Judgment...more paperwork and aggravation Im afraid unless you call CCBC and explain that it was purely down to error and being LiP.

Technically the defence was received on time and Im sure allowance should be made with no cost to yourself.They allow errors for the big boys and turn a blind eye.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No but dont make application yet until you speak to CCBC...and question why the default Judgment was placed.As per my post # 311

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter arrived from CCMC

 

to defendant

 

you have not replied to the claim form

 

it is therefore ordered you must pay the claimant £xxxx for debt (and interest to date of judgement) and £375 cost

 

you must pay £xxxx forthwith.

 

 

TBI also written

 

interest payable after a judgement

 

the notice is being given to you because a court judgement has been obtained against you in relation to the agreement. under the agreement we are allowed to continue to charge you interest on all the sums which the judgement states you owe us

 

this notice is to advise you that we intend to charge you interest, the rate 8% per annum on the judgment debt of £xxxx

 

interest will be charged from the day of this notice (i.e. when the notice is deemed to have been delivered to you in the post onwards.

 

 

 

OK. so i need to get a set aside sorted.

 

questions

 

1 - i sent A.O.S. to solicitor as it said on the form to - was it THEIR job to pass this to the court that i extended to 28 days? or mine? as i assumed it was their job and they DIDNT notify the court.

 

2 - STILL have not been sent a real claim form stamped with the court seal! so still cant get on MCOL.

 

3- i filed my defence on the 17th as i was told by the solicitors in writing I had to the 18th. (forgot to sign so rejected)

 

4 - Court told me I was already out of time on the 4th.... is this my own fault? or the solicitors?

 

5 - how long have i got to set aside? I have a N244 printed off here so need to know how long i have got

 

thanks

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

unles the judgement says they can charge post judgemental interest they cant.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

only says what my post #316 on the judgement

 

just phoned ccmc - set aside is £80 :( 

 

on the N244 it asked me who should be served with this application?

 

do i put TBI or the name of the solicitors dealing with this?

 

thanks

 

I need to sent n244 today. I will send evidence I sent it before the 18th. Should I be sending my defence with this? It also says I need to send extra copies for other parties. Do I do this just for tbi or do I have to incude ascot lawyers also? Thanks

 

sent n244 with defence and and evidence of errors

 

just checked all 3 CRA's - showing CCJ on all 3 already :(

 

set aside granted and also court sent me some real copies of the claim forms.

 

Looking at the aos sheet there is a blank section for me to write my address in for docs to be sent to me....

 

The one I got from the lawyers was totally different and had their address typed in

 

..which I thought was court produced so sent aos to the lawyers.

 

Seems like a devious act possibly??

 

no wonder I sent it to the wrong place

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

great news!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought so too

 

luckily i photocopied the AOS that ascot sent me before i sent it back to them to acknowledge. I sent it with my n244 so the judge now nows why i didnt send it to the court and only to them.

 

 

the court letter:

 

deputy district judge considered the papers in the case and ordered that;

 

1 the judgement entered against the defendant in default of the filing of an acknowledgement of service and/or defence is set aside :)

 

2 the defendant must file a defence within 14 days of the date of service of this order on the defendant.

 

I dont quite understand 2.... i must serve on myself?!

 

i sent my defence with the n244. would the court accept then that I have already sent it??

 

thanks

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought so too

 

luckily i photocopied the AOS that ascot sent me before i sent it back to them to acknowledge. I sent it with my n244 so the judge now nows why i didnt send it to the court and only to them.

 

 

the court letter:

 

deputy district judge considered the papers in the case and ordered that;

 

1 the judgement entered against the defendant in default of the filing of an acknowledgement of service and/or defence is set aside :)

 

2 the defendant must file a defence within 14 days of the date of service of this order on the defendant.

 

I dont quite understand 2.... i must serve on myself?!

i sent my defence with the n244. would the court accept then that I have already sent it??

 

thanks

 

 

Probably a typo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Set aside granted and also court sent me some real copies of the claim forms."

 

3 Days Gust so swift....... that's because it was their error..... hope you didn't pay for the application? .... as advise in my post #311 & #315 ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned about it and was told I had to pay 80. Letter says I have 14 days from letter ? I sent defence with n244. Is that acceptable? Ta

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jobs worth being pedantic ...they could of accepted the defence and just asked you resubmit with the SoT..instead of applying default judgment. Check that they have got your defence attached to the N244 and is that now acceptable.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

phoned today and defence accepted with n244.

 

I asked for 80 refund as their fault with aos.

She said send in allocation sheet?

Whats that.

Im still waiting for it.

 

My counterclaim fee is 95 quid which i must send.

 

Ps what would the 35 quid refund be for

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disregard the refund Gust it now just an £80 fee

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening

 

received set aside and they sent me my £80 cheque back :) i have till 18th to file counterclaim..

 

. so could use some help on that! the fee is £95 mostly for unfair charges around the 2K mark. Now TBi own this debt then my counterclaim is against them isnt it?

 

I asked for proof of any payment to tbi and all i was sent was a spreadsheet type letter - no reciept type proof. is this enough?

 

I have an allocation form here to fill in too but have a little more time than the counterclaim

 

I have done the PPi reclaim spready and unfair charges with compound interest. What covering letter would I need to put with this? I was sold the PPi telling me the loan would have failed the credit check without it and taking it would increase my chances of the loan

 

Also C.A.B. told me that it was a bank churn loan as the loan was to settle an older loan but I wasnt given an early settlement figure and it cleared the whole amount.

 

not sure how to layout counterclaim and dont wanted it rejected!

 

any help please :)

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so it was a refinance of an earlier loan

if so have you got those statements i forget did you sar HFc [your claims goto HFC]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I have sar - but HFC destroyed old acc

 

the claims goto HFC? is it aceptable as a counterclaim then? (as i thought this was against the claimant who is TBI)

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the reclaims goto HFC , but as you are using these to counter the claims by TBI, you can include them in your court stuff

 

just puts the demanded balance into serious despute.

so hence another nail in their overall claim coffin.

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i did as thats what i thought i had to do to get 28 days instead of 14

 

just to add - the AOS had ascots address typed in already and It looks official so thats why i sent it - would this be why the judge set aside and also returned my £80 cheque?

 

It is now costing the claimaint £220 for allocation. Is this usual or because of what they did to me?

If i help feel free to click star on my post. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to add - the AOS had ascots address typed in already and It looks official so thats why i sent it - would this be why the judge set aside and also returned my £80 cheque? No because there wasnt an hearing for your set a side it was their error.

 

It is now costing the claimaint £220 for allocation. Is this usual or because of what they did to me?

No its usual

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...