Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Experto/Varde now Arrow/Shoos Claimform - old MBNA card debt


roygoodbeat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3924 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

NOA I understand has to come to you from MBNA signed for, check with others as you are getting the rubbish notification of NOA as we got in one of Experto!s own envelopes, make sure you keep the envelopes with letters.? others will advise I am sure.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

On a side note they also sent a me a copy of my long awaited default notice (I have the original plus envelope) . It's clearly been fabricated with the dates and amounts changed to comply with the law. Where shall I go with this? Moral of the story - KEEP THOSE ENVELOPES!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi reignoffire

 

I also recevied a 'reconstructed' copy of an MBNA default notice (via Hillsden). Copy DN is signed by a different person than the original, date of copy is approx 3 months before that of the original and requirements to remedy breach are different. The original DN appears at correct date in SAR records, there is no trace in SAR records of the 'copy' at the supposed date.

 

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi reignoffire

 

I also recevied a 'reconstructed' copy of an MBNA default notice (via Hillsden). Copy DN is signed by a different person than the original, date of copy is approx 3 months before that of the original and requirements to remedy breach are different. The original DN appears at correct date in SAR records, there is no trace in SAR records of the 'copy' at the supposed date.

 

C

Subbing exactly same situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Lots of MBNA ending up sold to Varde and then Experto sending a letter saying they are acting on behalf of Varde....unless you have received a Letter of Assignment from MBNA and more important VARDE why would Experto expect you to pay money to them and what is more take their word that they act for Varde................Am in the same position with Experto myself and I will not pay them as I say Ive never heard of them or Varde so PROVE IT..............to date nothing.....................FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have written to MBNA with another subject access request.

 

The response so far. Nothing from MBNA but after several section 10 requests for Experto not to call on my work mobile.

 

1) Text sent on the 24th December from Experto with their xmas opening times and their 24 hour payment facility.

 

2) The multiple phone calls started on the 27th Dec.

 

Happy xmas from experto, ignoring my lawful requests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am having similar problems with Experto.

 

MBNA and now Experto have only sent application form and current T&C's. This does not comply with the Waksman Ruling. Application does not contain prescribed T&C's.

 

Experto did not respond to my Subject Access Request until last month. (It's taken them 9 months to admit that they had received this request and that I paid for it) They have hardly produced anything and the deed of assignment is typed on one sheet, no date and is in no way a proper legal document.

 

They still call me on the phone and have ignored my requests to remove my number and ignored my section 10 request. Have never receivd a proper deed of assignment from mbna.

 

They also sold the debt prior to the default notice and Experto wrote to me during the default recification period. Have accepted there unlawful termination. Just being ignored by Experto.

 

Wrote back in December to MBNA again for another subject access request. No acknowledgment. Almost 40 days is up. Keep on having this same problem over and over again with both of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi......Roy....did Experto state when the debt was sold that they represent Varde Ireland who purchased the debt??????????????...........with regard to Experto and MBNA,IMO you need to make ICO and OFT aware of both their absolute dont care attitude,and their complete lack of compliance of OFT guidelines,............MBNA have very recently had their wrists slapped for their attitude by OFT..........FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default notice dated 9th oct for full balance. rectify by 26th oct.

 

Letter from experto dated 17th Oct saying that they were representing varde and had been sold the debt.

 

Just had the mbna subject access request today.

 

Log confirms charge off on sep 30th. Sold to varde 17th Oct.

 

No deed of assignment for mbna to experto, no mbna statements included since they took over from beneficail bank. No deed of assignment for mbna taking over from beneficial bank.

 

Also on the log, they had received a letter of complaint on the 6th Oct, with a note to put on hold for 28 days. Complaint was ignored and reply not sent until 20th Nov.

 

I have also writen to mbna accepting unlawful termination of contract. They wrote back saying that the debt had not been sold until end of oct, after the default rectify date. Log and Experto say otherwise. Sounds to me both mbna and experto are acting outside the rules on this, could this be possible fraud?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roy...I have made this statement before much earlier in the thread....why would you pay Experto who you have never heard of who say they represent Varde who you have never heard of.........You have not received a letter of Assignment from Varde or had any communication from them regarding their authority to allow Experto to act on their behalf,why would we even contact Experto???????....FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts exactly.

 

No valid default notice.

Section 78 not fully complied with

Subject Access Requests not complied with by both MBNA & Experto

No deed of assignment

No letter from Varde

Unlawfully terminated contract, of which I could counterclaim in a court of law along with costs for unlawful charges.

Ignoring section 10 requests

False statements by MBNA

False statements and threats by Experto

 

Not a chance of paying a single penny. More of a chance of me counter suing should I have to but they do not even have an enforceable agreement in place so this has a good chance of being thorown out by a court of law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Advice needed.

 

Mbna sent me my subject access request but failed to include the recent statements and deeds of assignment. I wrote to them stating that these were not there and surprise surprise, yet another call from Experto and letters.

 

Also checked on the log from mbna and it clearly states that the debt was charged off prior to the issue of the default notice and sold to experto during the default notice period. (This is backed up by a letter from experto stating that the debt had been sold to them) This goes against what mbna said when i calimed for unlawful rescission of the agreement as they state that the account was sold after the default period and yet all the evidence says otherwise. Sounds like a cover up or fraud to me.

 

Still waiting to hear back from mbna but experto have now passed my details onto their solicitrs legal (something) giving 7 days to pay up the alleged debt or else they may take me to court.

 

Fed up with experto and mbna side stepping everything. Any advice or should I just ignore these letters and calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usual experto crap, HL legal letter frightening, another words sent by experto, look down the side of the letter code: - etc experto + numbers?? if so another 75p HL solicitors letter for sale @ 75P? did it say to repond only direct to Experto?? sold to vardi usual letter but came from experto (just in case keep the envelopes attached to letters).

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

A Dn claiming the full account balance in order to remedy it is as near to a 100% defective DN as one is ever going to get- as it would be impossible for the debtor to lawfully comply with it

 

Is this statement still true after all the recent rulings?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, i take it you refer to the Brandon ruling........in that case the judge argued that although brandon had not been given 14 days in the dn- the creditor did not terminate for 3 weeks and so brandon (presumably who had a crystal ball and could see what was ahead- and somehow should have known when the creditor was going to terminated even before the creditor himself) had plenty of time to remedy

 

not unruurprisingly this is being appealed

 

however that has nothing to do with your situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Since the last HL letter, I have had one stating that they would be arranging a doorstep visit and calling around. I ignored that. Today I have now received:

 

We have now received instructions to issue proceedings against you in the county court for the recovery of the full amount outstanding together with interest and costs.

 

Letter goes on to say, contact Experto to pay or discuss.

 

Anyone had experience with this letter or do I ignore it and wait?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...