Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

capquest/Opos limited letter on old MBNA account


JT2002
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I received a letter from capquest about a week ago saying they assigned ownership and legal rights to my credit agreement (previously with MBNA) to Arrow Polar Designated Activity Company, who then appointed Capquest Debt Recovery limited as admin of my account going forward.

I thought it is a scam so just ignored it.

I then received an email today (personal email which I only use for some online banking registrations so don't really junk emails usually) from Capquest stating my account is now managed by Opos Limited and gave me an online account number and PIN to pay for the outstanding balance - which is £6k! 

I am unsure what to do here but it seems this company does have access to my personal information which is very concerning.

I had an MBNA credit card probably 15 years ago (still trying to find any statement through my emails to check the period I owned it and if I had any contacts from MBNA in regard of the credit card) but I don't recall any details of when I closed the account etc.

I never had any contacts in the last 6 yrs since I lived here, but was living outside of UK for about 8 yrs

- I checked my credit score all seemed fine and no CCJ while I was away.

I am unsure if I should response to validate the debt or just ignore them. 

Thanks very much in advance for any advices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its simply because capquest and the debts they owned have now become a part of a different debt buying/DCA group - arrows.

 

just like lowells have recently bought out Hoist uk.

when this happens its quite usual for the new group to send out 100'000 of letter to see if they can scam some mug that believes DCA are bailiffs and not the TOTALLY POWETLESS firms they really are , to pay them. 

as you've discovered most of these debts are statute barred.

pers i'd send capquest our SB letter from the debt collection section of our library

nail them in their coffin.

 

just one other point, you indicate you are worried they have your pers information. 

well thats a good thing in a way as you've obviously moved around a bit and never bothered to inform your debt owners of your correct and current address in writing. you've been lucky you've had no backdoor CCJ 's....NEVER run from debt no matter how old it is

 

dx

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk,

Thanks a lot for the response and link to the library - this is very helpful. But having looked at the statute barred letter, it seems to say one have not made any payments, acknowledgement etc in the last six years time hence it is barred, is this not admitting knowledge of the debt? I read some posts are suggesting to send 'prove it' letter - should I do the prove it letter first then this statute barred letter? or the SB letter alone will do?

In regard of personal info, I did not mean to hide it but was surprised that they obtained email address which I have not used long. During the years my current account has not changed and I updated my previous addresses with the bank so I am assuming all this info is in my credit file and can be accessed, only email I don't understand. 

Edited by JT2002
remove quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

nope prove it letter is useless should not ever have been written

silly letter tennis.

sb letter is NOT acking the debt, and anyway if a debt is SB'd it CANNOT become unbarred...not even a judge can do that.

as for the email, it will be in the info the bank gave the debt buyer which they are quite entitled to hold,

sorry but you seen very green

go read a good few threads in the debt selfhelp forum

dx

 

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...