Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

All this talk about guns


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

DD went to the US a few months back to visit a friend. She is a bit of an extrovert, talks loudly, waves her arms about, that kind of thing. They were in a bar (in Michigan) and she was being her usual self, and her American friend kept on telling her to be a bit quieter. Well, they'd met in Italy and DD couldn't understand why all of a sudden her friend was being bothered by something like this.

 

She got this sobering answer: "Here, people start gesticulating and shouting, other people get worried, because that person may well be carrying a gun and could start shooting any moment." She added that in the not particularly crowded bar where they were, it was likely that at least 3/4 of the people sitting there would be carrying a gun of some sort.

 

DD found that terrifying. As do I. As for the old chestnut that "guns don't kill people, people kill people", that's BS. Unarmed people may want to kill people, but it takes someone with a weapon to actually do it. (Generally speaking)

 

Fact is, as long as you have harsh gun control, you have fewer chances of illicit guns changing hands, so the general population is less at risk. Long may it last.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

DD went to the US a few months back to visit a friend. She is a bit of an extrovert, talks loudly, waves her arms about, that kind of thing. They were in a bar (in Michigan) and she was being her usual self, and her American friend kept on telling her to be a bit quieter. Well, they'd met in Italy and DD couldn't understand why all of a sudden her friend was being bothered by something like this.

 

She got this sobering answer: "Here, people start gesticulating and shouting, other people get worried, because that person may well be carrying a gun and could start shooting any moment." She added that in the not particularly crowded bar where they were, it was likely that at least 3/4 of the people sitting there would be carrying a gun of some sort.

 

DD found that terrifying. As do I. As for the old chestnut that "guns don't kill people, people kill people", that's BS. Unarmed people may want to kill people, but it takes someone with a weapon to actually do it. (Generally speaking)

 

Fact is, as long as you have harsh gun control, you have fewer chances of illicit guns changing hands, so the general population is less at risk. Long may it last.

 

I'd have been out of there like greased lightening :!:

Life is like an echo, it all returns......The good, the bad, the false, the true......So if you give life the best you have, the best will come back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i learned to shoot in america and it was intresting how many of them owned guns, even the cook at camp had one in an ankle holster

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

not by a long shot

 

air rifles are fine, so are air pistols

 

if your in a gun club its easy to get a liscence

 

crossbows fine.

 

easy to build a potato cannon, even a semi automatic one + easy to modify

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

not by a long shot

 

air rifles are fine, so are air pistols

 

if your in a gun club its easy to get a liscence

 

crossbows fine.

 

easy to build a potato cannon, even a semi automatic one + easy to modify

 

Labrat will be conducting a demonstration later, on how to build a flame thrower using nothing but two loo roll tubes, some sticky back plastic and a bucket full of papier mache.

 

*Please insert generic "Do not try this at home" warning here*

 

 

 

:lol:

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

doubt it laughing girl - last flamethower i built was when i was 11, and lost all my hair on one side and set fire to the garage

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Terrible (but all too common event). There are too many innocents taken by idiots with guns. On the plus side though, most people killed by them are the dregs of society.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely heart-breaking. I cannot even begin to understand what was going on in this young mans mind.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

.. I cannot even begin to understand what was going on in this young mans mind.

 

maybe he was on a similar wavelengh as sodems odd view #60! ie re

On the plus side though, most people killed by them are the dregs of society.
:!: Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe he was on a similar wavelengh as sodems odd view #60! ie re :!:

 

Where you got that from, I don't know.

 

Most victims of shootings are targeted for a reason. These people were shot for no apparent reason. That in itself is terrible.

 

There are plenty of shootings around my city now (far too many). But fortunately, there have been no innocent victims. That's all I was saying.

 

 

I'm not condoning this persons actions in any way.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. no worries, your post was a bit ambiguous. thought you were talking about the victims of such US shootings, and not crim on crim shootings which i now presume you mean. ie you say 'most' shooting victims here. (ie apart from the innocent victims!)

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

How many more victims before their precious 2nd amendment rights are curbed at last? Oh, hang on, never, it's a vote loser, any presidential candidate taking a slightly less than 100% pro-gun stance in the US never gets anywhere. The gun lobby is all powerful in the US. :-(

 

Sorry, the line "guns dont' kill people, people kill people" is getting harder and harder to swallow at each new massacre, not that I ever saw it as so much sanctimonious babble before anyway. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lived in a society where gun ownership was almost mandatory due to acts of terrorism on a daily basis. Our children were taught properly on how to handle various guns from a revolver through to an automatic weapon like the Uzi sub machine gun. It was a necessity in order to protect lives.

In the 14 years of the bush war, I can only recollect one incident where a husband shot MIL, wife and someone else but the incident was related to a divorce. Our kids knew that they had to follow procedures when handling weapons and the danger associated with the weapon.

It is very difficult to understand why in a gun society we have these mass murders unless the kids have been influenced by TV, video games, etc. There is proof of this happening!

Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently he didnt legally own the guns they were his mothers - who he killed first..

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i love the way i comment on a gun thread then it dies - its like i have a reputation or something

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lived in a society where gun ownership was almost mandatory due to acts of terrorism on a daily basis. Our children were taught properly on how to handle various guns from a revolver through to an automatic weapon like the Uzi sub machine gun. It was a necessity in order to protect lives.

In the 14 years of the bush war, I can only recollect one incident where a husband shot MIL, wife and someone else but the incident was related to a divorce. Our kids knew that they had to follow procedures when handling weapons and the danger associated with the weapon.

It is very difficult to understand why in a gun society we have these mass murders unless the kids have been influenced by TV, video games, etc. There is proof of this happening!

 

It's not about computer games. People who are violent are attracted to violent games, but games do not cause violence (otherwise countries with high levels of gaming like Japan and South Korea would have the most violence, which they don't). Its about the culture of fear and hate that is promoted in the US (watch Bowling for Columbine - I'm not a big Michael Moore fan, but he made some good points in this film). I also suspect that the culture of alienation of anyone 'different' - particularly in high school age children contributes to mental health problems that come with these sort of 'breakdowns'.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...