Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
    • If you are helping a family member you are going to need their Government Gateway details in order to Log in to MCOL .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is the bank taking your Benefits ?


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4070 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have a thread open from yesterday, I have not had any advice yet on what to do next for my son. Could someone plese look at my thread and advise? http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/nationwide/201306-help-required-bank-charges.html#post2191149

 

They seem to have ignored the social security act, have said that hardship cannot be considered as on the running of the account they can see that regular deposits were credited (past tense)? His jobseekers goes in to a different account. All of the amount overdrawn is bank charges and he does not have an overdraft facility. The amount was just £20 overdrawn and went up to £297 with charges added on. £100 was paid in to his account by his sister, because she was scared for him.

Any help on what to say in my complaint would be great

Thanks

JP08

 

I've made a reply in the thread you started.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I know this is not really on topic here but has everyone noticed that the CC companies now call all their £12 charges 'Default Sums'?

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Little (personal) update here (and cynically amusing too!):

I posted details regarding HSBC and myself in early May. The jist of it was that after chatting at length and supplying Income and Expenditure details it was agreed that 'no' attempt would be made in June to take a loan payment. It was stated that calls would not happen and on 1st June I would be contacted for an update of the situation.

Nice eh, all 'arranged' at it were?! What actually happened was in the week prior to the end of May I received 3 calls and only 1 of which I managed to answer as the other 2 stopped before I could speak. I explianed (sigh) the agreement made and after checking notes the conversation ended. On 4th June I thought I should pay all my bills as almost fainted when I saw 2 (yes 2!!) instalment loan payments had been taken on 2nd June. Today (5th June) I received a call before I could call them fuming at what had happened. The opening line after the usual security bit, 'Hello this is the HSBC collections department regarding outstading payments on your loan account'. This is the type of 'idiotic not knowing a problem before opening mouth' usual thing from all financial institutions and not just HSBC. It's the usual type of robotic responces that happen whatever you say.

The end result was the payments were reinstated onto our(now reduced to a basic) current account. One of the things avoid payments (and hassle) was to agree the account downgrading yet it was a totally pointless task. Motto 'Never believe anything you are told'. Having not been advised the monies were restored guess what the next question was? - Yes, you've guessed it, 'How much will you be paying off your loan today?'. Apaprt from me flying off the handle requesting the call be listened to I despair at the performance I endured. 'You are welcome to complain sir', and 'If you are not happy with our responce you can complain to the FSA' are unbelievable statements from robotic collection drones. This was all done even after I mentioned 'Beachy Head' as possibly being a furture option too!

Complaints are seldom if ever upheld by the bank and complaining to the FSA means the bank sends you the same answer. They are clever at always just getting to the line but not crossing it.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael, would it not be worth your setting up a parachute account with another bank :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i still it might be worth asking the bank to give you a transcript of the call(if they have one, of course).

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this is not really on topic here but has everyone noticed that the CC companies now call all their £12 charges 'Default Sums'?

Michael

 

It appears to be an approach adopted by other sectors too such as insurance.

Nevertheless,when push comes to the shove they are still very reluctant in providing a breakdown that demonstrates the £12 as a genuine pre-estimate of what it costs them to administer.

I had all my £12 charges refunded by Swinton Insurance after quite lengthly communications with them at CEO level.

They continually maintained that I had agreed to terms and conditions and that was the end of the matter.

I replied that although I had agreed to their terms and conditions,I had not agreed that the £12.00 was a true calculation of what it cost them to deal with a default-and gave them a 14 day LBA to prove it to be the case.

Their cheque promptly followed in 10 days !!!

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Micheal sorry to be blunt but why aren't you recording them & if not why not

 

Thanks to everyone for the replies...

 

With respect to recording one has to advise or have audible beeps to indicate a call is being recorded. Recording calls is IMHO not a 'best' way of dealing with things.

The facts are simple in that they take notes. They are good at taking notes. In my case there was 'no' dispute to what I commented was said - that was of course when the 'this is the collections department' repeated reply ended. I made it plain that he scroll back on the notes. In the end with my prompting he did apologise and whilst I was on the phone the funds were 'reversed'. This however, should never have happened in the first place.

Yes, I agree that I should set up another 'basic account' with a different bank. I've been meaning to do this for a long time so I should kick myself for not doing this earlier. The fact is that it's my wife's income within a joint account as mine is nowadays 'zero'. The other income is the (embarassing) council tax and housing allowance.

 

Thanks again

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

THE ABBEY have today taken £145 in one go, in charges from my account which completely wiped out my £110 family credit and left me with £6 to last the rest of the week. This money is supposed to be for myself and my handicapped teenage son coupled with my low weekly wage. When I complained, I felt humilated that I had to BEG for my own money back!

 

Eventually, I was informed in front of other customers that £75 would be put back 'This Time' only. I was told that it dos'nt matter where the money comes from, if it's in my account they will take it if I owe them charges!...Surely our family credit was'nt awarded to swell the coffers of these already bloated banks! I even sent in a 'Right of Appropreation' 3 months ago but it was completely ignored.

 

Surely this underhand 'abhorrent' idea of taking peoples basic living benefits to pay off illegal extortionate bank charges cannot be legal or continue without some sort of FIGHT BACK?:mad:

 

pezz1753

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE ABBEY have today taken £145 in one go, in charges from my account which completely wiped out my £110 family credit and left me with £6 to last the rest of the week. This money is supposed to be for myself and my handicapped teenage son coupled with my low weekly wage. When I complained, I felt humilated that I had to BEG for my own money back!

 

Eventually, I was informed in front of other customers that £75 would be put back 'This Time' only. I was told that it dos'nt matter where the money comes from, if it's in my account they will take it if I owe them charges!...Surely our family credit was'nt awarded to swell the coffers of these already bloated banks! I even sent in a 'Right of Appropreation' 3 months ago but it was completely ignored.

When benefits goes into an account it is treated as income, and if bank charges are incurred then they are legitimate(given the OFT test case has yet to be finally completed). However, the Right of Appropriation is very hazy at best and most banks do not seem to have any hard and fast rule even though you have that right.

Surely this underhand 'abhorrent' idea of taking peoples basic living benefits to pay off illegal extortionate bank charges cannot be legal or continue without some sort of FIGHT BACK?:mad:

 

pezz1753

 

There is an argument that would say that the charges are the consequence of not covering payments going out. I would say if an account is incurring regular charges that you need to open a parachute account for the benefits in all honesty.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE ABBEY have today taken £145 in one go, in charges from my account which completely wiped out my £110 family credit and left me with £6 to last the rest of the week. This money is supposed to be for myself and my handicapped teenage son coupled with my low weekly wage. When I complained, I felt humilated that I had to BEG for my own money back!

 

Eventually, I was informed in front of other customers that £75 would be put back 'This Time' only. I was told that it dos'nt matter where the money comes from, if it's in my account they will take it if I owe them charges!...Surely our family credit was'nt awarded to swell the coffers of these already bloated banks! I even sent in a 'Right of Appropreation' 3 months ago but it was completely ignored.

 

Surely this underhand 'abhorrent' idea of taking peoples basic living benefits to pay off illegal extortionate bank charges cannot be legal or continue without some sort of FIGHT BACK?:mad:

 

pezz1753

 

I'd ages ago would have said 'complain in writing' but from my own experience know this will do nothing. Are you saying that a bank teller spoke to you at the counter in public? If so this is to say the least shameful (and of course embarassing) and should never happen.

As mentioned nicely by 'YourBank' open up a basic account - It would strangely seem that Barclay's is a suggested best bet for that having viewed others.

Having been blatantly lied to and then told they were being helpful I don't believe anything a bank tells me anymore.

Dare we ask why they charged you without notice £145 in one fail swoop?

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges were 4 X £35 Charges for NOT paying four direct debits over a two week period in May and also single charge of £5 in June. I emailed them in May and asked for time to pay & explained my current circumstances and naively assumed it would be taken in installments, I was quite shocked when they took it all at once. So in actual fact they charged me £145 for doing nothing more than refusing my DDs!...Nice work if you can get it!!

I appreciate that these charges will at some time be taken from my account, but I never thought that they would wait until my Family Credit was paid in on a Monday to take it! They can quite easily check to see that I get paid monthly from my job and they could have just waited until my July wages were paid in and then deduct the charges in installments.

 

My point is; that Family Benefits such as Family Credit should be 'untouchable' when it comes to collecting illegal extortionate charges like these. These family credit entitlements are based on 'family' circumstances such as my handicapped son and therefore that money is provided by the tax-payer for that family not just the person who actually receives it each week. Why should the other family members be denied their entitlement because I have inadvertently accumilated these extortionate & illegal bank charges?

 

Pezz1753

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges were 4 X £35 Charges for NOT paying four direct debits over a two week period in May and also single charge of £5 in June. I emailed them in May and asked for time to pay & explained my current circumstances and naively assumed it would be taken in installments, I was quite shocked when they took it all at once. So in actual fact they charged me £145 for doing nothing more than refusing my DDs!...Nice work if you can get it!!

I appreciate that these charges will at some time be taken from my account, but I never thought that they would wait until my Family Credit was paid in on a Monday to take it! They can quite easily check to see that I get paid monthly from my job and they could have just waited until my July wages were paid in and then deduct the charges in installments.

 

My point is; that Family Benefits such as Family Credit should be 'untouchable' when it comes to collecting illegal extortionate charges like these. These family credit entitlements are based on 'family' circumstances such as my handicapped son and therefore that money is provided by the tax-payer for that family not just the person who actually receives it each week. Why should the other family members be denied their entitlement because I have inadvertently accumilated these extortionate & illegal bank charges?

 

Pezz1753

 

Okay.

From this it's assumed that the DD's are now cancelled? This is normal practice. The only thing anyone would offer would be an overdraft which can be decided instantly otherwise it's a loan (which can these days be handled just as fast.

Personally I've been in exactly the same situation. I take it you've applied for 'financial hardship' (as in repayment of bank charges) however when I did they refused it on the grounds it was (at that time) my own fault back in January.

The view of the banks is that if the funds are there they will take them. If not and you have D/D's or S/O's that they do not pay they will assume the charges automatically. Their view is the emphasis is on yourself to ensure funds are available. What concerns me is that you previously said you were sown up in front of other customers. Never should this kind of action be done in public as at the 'teller' point. Whilst as I mentioned before complaiints are commonplace you might lodge this in the way you were treated as a good lever to refund the charges.

Untill the court case is finalised and the OFT has the ability to decide on charges it's not something that will go away. Personal situations until then are wise to talk to the bank. I seldom ever step foot into my HSBC local branch but if you feel better doing that make an appointment to see them. If the D/D's are still in place they will be called on again and charges made. The problem is that a creditor might make the call for payment again before the next due date and if their are no funds the bank will charge. The situation be it for whatever reason is looked on equally. In my case I'm now unemployed, get no benefits and want to work (more than many can possibly imagine) - To the bank that is quite irrelevant and my loan with them will eventually go into default for non payment.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant to add that it's not unusual (and quite common practise) for a bank to close an account if over a 3 month period more than 6 D/D's or S/O's are refused/returned. If you find that the fugure is going to be that it might be wise to cancel them all yourself. Many D/D's unpaid incur penalties from the respective creditors as well just to add to the spiraling debt.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE ABBEY have today taken £145 in one go, in charges from my account which completely wiped out my £110 family credit and left me with £6 to last the rest of the week. This money is supposed to be for myself and my handicapped teenage son coupled with my low weekly wage. When I complained, I felt humilated that I had to BEG for my own money back!

 

Eventually, I was informed in front of other customers that £75 would be put back 'This Time' only. I was told that it dos'nt matter where the money comes from, if it's in my account they will take it if I owe them charges!...Surely our family credit was'nt awarded to swell the coffers of these already bloated banks! I even sent in a 'Right of Appropreation' 3 months ago but it was completely ignored.

 

Surely this underhand 'abhorrent' idea of taking peoples basic living benefits to pay off illegal extortionate bank charges cannot be legal or continue without some sort of FIGHT BACK?:mad:

 

pezz1753

 

This behaviour by some jumped up little snotty jobsworth is not only probably a breach of whatever guidelines they have but it's also unlawful as it breached your rights under the DPA - Personally I would go back into the branch demand to see the manager & tell them in no uncertain terms as loudly as possible that you fully intend to report them AND their employee to the ICO - jumped up little twots:mad:

 

There are some who come on these sites & ask that we be sympathetic to front line staff - "It's not their fault" they bleat - sorry utter nonsense they know full well that what they are doing is if not unlawful at least immoral - Having listened & been a witness to some of their behaviour I have absolutely no sympathy whatsoever for bank staff who follow the party line & the more who lose their jobs the better I'll like it:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just got a quick question.

 

My partner has been trying to claim back 2 charges from Alliance & Leicester. We are currently on benefits & the only money that goes into his account is JSA. He went over his authorised overdraft by less than £5 & got charged, putting him further over the overdraft & we couldn't clear it immediately, so got charged for that too. he wrote claiming financial hardship & they wrote back asking him to complete an income/expenditure form which he did. They've now written again saying that they want to see proof of 3 months income (payslips) or benefit payment as they cannot see it crediting on his account & also details of any savings.

He did explain on the form that we receive housing benefit, child tax credit & child benefit, but that those come into my account which is not held with Alliance & Leicester. I am guessing those are the payments that they are referring to not showing on his account, but is it entirely necessary for me to send them details of what gets paid into my account? I've done 2 financial hardship claims myself this year & neither asked me for proof of income/benefits, they just credited the money back to me. It seems like a lot of information (or an excuse to stall!)

Halifax Credit Card : PPI Claim Successful! :D

 

Freemans : CCA request sent - ACCOUNT WRITTEN OFF :D

 

Alliance & Leicester: PPI Claim Successful! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just got a quick question.

 

My partner has been trying to claim back 2 charges from Alliance & Leicester. We are currently on benefits & the only money that goes into his account is JSA. He went over his authorised overdraft by less than £5 & got charged, putting him further over the overdraft & we couldn't clear it immediately, so got charged for that too. he wrote claiming financial hardship & they wrote back asking him to complete an income/expenditure form which he did. They've now written again saying that they want to see proof of 3 months income (payslips) or benefit payment as they cannot see it crediting on his account & also details of any savings.

He did explain on the form that we receive housing benefit, child tax credit & child benefit, but that those come into my account which is not held with Alliance & Leicester. I am guessing those are the payments that they are referring to not showing on his account, but is it entirely necessary for me to send them details of what gets paid into my account? I've done 2 financial hardship claims myself this year & neither asked me for proof of income/benefits, they just credited the money back to me. It seems like a lot of information (or an excuse to stall!)

 

This is actually a standard request. I've been through it all in entirety. Previously were you claiming just recently charged fees or actual 'hardship' in respect of bank charges?

They expect a true and qualified display of total household income. You want items refunded claiming financial hardship and they want the details to prove it. Sadly in this case it might mean you copying other bank details as you say housing benefits etc get paid into another banks account. If they still doubt they might even make a CRA enquiry but this is not mormal.

It's been mentioned many times before but hardship claims are voluntary in respect of a financial institution's final decision. You'll need to show that what you defined as income can be quantified (as mentioned before) but I'd suggest that banks are reasonably generous on expenditure allowances even to allow for alcohol and tobacco.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

This behaviour by some jumped up little snotty jobsworth is not only probably a breach of whatever guidelines they have but it's also unlawful as it breached your rights under the DPA - Personally I would go back into the branch demand to see the manager & tell them in no uncertain terms as loudly as possible that you fully intend to report them AND their employee to the ICO - jumped up little twots:mad:

I think perhaps you could make a complaint to their Head Office ie making what is called a grievance against the member of staff. In such difficult a time for you they humiliated you in front of other people rather than offering you privacy ie an interview room, to deal with this issue.

There are some who come on these sites & ask that we be sympathetic to front line staff - "It's not their fault" they bleat - sorry utter nonsense they know full well that what they are doing is if not unlawful at least immoral -

To a point I agree with what you are saying, however, Banks look to try and influence/take over every aspect of your life. Even if bank staff post on internet forums, if they identify themselves, the bank will take action(yes I have examples and I'm not one of them). I used to say that you should be sympathetic but i am on the fence on that issue today. Many staff are simply scared of losing their jobs even though, I can say, the grass is greener on the other side. Having a job or not having a job---that is their choice. Unfortunately not many branch staff have the cajones to do anything.

 

Having listened & been a witness to some of their behaviour I have absolutely no sympathy whatsoever for bank staff who follow the party line & the more who lose their jobs the better I'll like it:lol:

 

Well, obviously I don't agree but I do understand totally what you mean with regards to the last point ;)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

JonCris,

 

Re your post #943 I absolutely/totally agree with your comments re the ignorance and absurd arrogance of *ank staff and their management, they of all people should hang their heads in shame, never mind the overbearing ignorance and totally unsympathetic attitude towards their customers that they continue to display, after bringing this country almost to its financial knees and of course being bailed out by the very same people who they treat with the utmost dis-respect.

 

Arrogance or ignorance is no excuse except of course when the *anks try and defend themselves pre court, during court and after court when of course, they are mostly exempted from the correct procedures that their customers have to endure, alas that is another story.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

 

:p:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Nationwide have also taken over £150 in charges over the last 6 weeks from my account and were going to charge a further £30 for going into an unauthorised overdraft, I went to my local branch and asked that the charges be repaid as it was benefits intended for our day to day living expenses.The manageress was quite helpful and said that she would put in a request to head office and they usually,as a one of gesture,payback the charges charges within 72 hours.Hoping to have the money in the account today.Interesting to see that the DWP can help as its because of a computor error on their part that I incurred these charges in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would appreciate some guidance here :)

 

CCA'd RBS, they confirmed no loan agreement. Sent a default which was wrong....sent another which is still wrong (I have told them and challenged them on it) but today they are apparently defaulting me and closing all my accounts (even earlier than the wrong date) on the default.

 

Thing is my benefits are due to be paid in n Thurs and I cannot get them rtansferred to my parachute acc in time.

 

Can I stop them?

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would appreciate some guidance here :)

 

CCA'd RBS, they confirmed no loan agreement. Sent a default which was wrong....sent another which is still wrong (I have told them and challenged them on it) but today they are apparently defaulting me and closing all my accounts (even earlier than the wrong date) on the default.

 

Thing is my benefits are due to be paid in n Thurs and I cannot get them rtansferred to my parachute acc in time.

 

Can I stop them?

 

Go down to the local branch and ask/demand to see someone, like today! Explain the whole thing including taking with you all the documents. See what they say. When did they initially tell you the account would be closed? The other thing is that your 'benefits' would probably be accepted because closing an account does not close the 'payments in' section (as that happened to me years ago!). In reality there's nothing to stop the bank closing an account as they see fit but the arguent here is 'hardship' and whilst voluntary it would not be 'good press' to see any bank not listen to argument.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...