Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I started paying her old council tax as they said they would jail her I managed to get those account details. We then got back together she moved in with me stopped me going to my house. Eventually let me back in I was there 4 days then the police showed up at 1am arrested me for 8 different offences. On the morning I was in custody she rang the letting agent and asked for the house to be changed to her sole name as I was in jail. The house was changed to her name I was made homeless. The bills she did not change to her name left them as occupier the utility companies then said I had to pay as there was lots more usage than an empty property. My solicitor said if I don't pay them I will be reported for it. It has since turned out that in her old property she didn't pay the bills. The electric bill she put in her daughter's name then cancelled the direct debit the council tax she never attempted to pay. Due to one of the accusations I have since been told I need to pay these bills even after getting emails saying I'm not liable for the bills. I have forwarded these on to the police and solicitors and had no reply. Other than you have to pay these bills. I'm also going to end up paying the bills where she lives now as once again they are not being paid. I can't go in to detail about the case as I'm due to be charged next week not sure what with yet but the police have told me I'm going to be charged.  My ex will not tell me nor can tell me about her debts as she doesn't want me to know how much debt she is in or has put her daughter in once she turned 18. I do not want to be paying her debts after what she has done to me.
    • In the earlier thread (now linked above) you were going to change your name by Deed Poll. Did you do that? Did it solve any of your problems? What, exactly, have you been charged with? Has a court date been scheduled? I cannot think of any reason why the police would tell you to pay your Ex's debts that she incurred 5 years before you met her. Either there's lots of the story you aren't telling us, or you have misunderstood what you have been told, or you are trolling us. Earlier you said it was your Ex who wanted you to pay her debts and, for some reason that  no-one here could understand, you were going to do so. So your Ex can give you all the details of her debts and you can pay them. She can hardly expect you to pay them if she won't give you the account details! I've never known debt collectors be fussy about who pays as long as someone does. They routinely take payments from friends and family to clear debts. It's not illegal to pay someone else's debts          
    • What you've said isn't helping. Please post up a redacted version of the appropriate section of the court papers.  HB
    • Oh, yeah. The law I’m charged with is riding underground without a valid ticket said by SJPN Student Union can’t provide any help, I have contacted them
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suspended from work pending investigation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3181 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having read through this thread I agree with the last few posts.

 

Whilst the employer may have a right to deal with disciplinary matters internally, where such a serious charge is being pursued they must follow the basic premise of 'innocent until proven guilty'.

 

It is one thing to theorise, but an entirely different matter gathering hard evidence to prove a crime.

 

So far as I can see from your thread, there is no credible evidence that you are the perpetrator of a criminal act. The company's booking office accounting systems appear to be insecure and do not protect the individual in addition to the company's revenue, because from what you tell us, these tickets/records appear to be accessible to anyone within the working area.

 

Such records as a shift balance & remittance, including non-issue records should be sealed with a numbered seal and put in a pouch supplied to each individual for the purpose. This pouch should be placed in a drop-safe or other secure location and only opened and checked by the authorised manager / accounts clerk. This process was established in BR days and many TOCs retain it today.

 

I would follow the suggestion made to play them at their own game.

 

As outlined by firstclassx, go to the British Transport Police and advise that you wish to make a statement in relation to an accusation by your employer that you have committed a criminal act namely theft. If the BTP do not want to get involved because they haven't been called in, demand to know why not from your employer. Ask what hard evidence has been collated and whether statements have been taken from all other parties who may have had access to the shift records / balance sheet / tickets /coupons regarding any discrepancies and the procedures in place.

 

The statement by the manager to the effect that "it is my belief that ML gained financially which constitutes theft" does not amount to hard fact, but is only an allegation. Demand to see the hard evidence that you have gained financially.

 

This is an allegation of a very serious criminal offence which may be found to be wholly unfounded once the 'evidence' is examined properly by an independent arbitor such as the Police.

 

Are you a member of RMT or TSSA ?

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

remember the evidence required for dismissal reasons is much lower than that required by a caught of law so "until proven guilty" does not apply. "balance of probabilities" does.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

remember the evidence required for dismissal reasons is much lower than that required by a caught of law so "until proven guilty" does not apply. "balance of probabilities" does.

 

Absolutely correct, but an accusation of 'theft' is an allegation of a criminal act and the OP is not obliged to accept 'non-evidence' and to leave it at that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely correct, but an accusation of 'theft' is an allegation of a criminal act and the OP is not obliged to accept 'non-evidence' and to leave it at that!

 

I think OP would be better served dealing with the job situation first. One giant stressful problem at a time!

 

Unless the employer gets the police involved no action may be necessary there.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think OP would be better served dealing with the job situation first. One giant stressful problem at a time!

 

Unless the employer gets the police involved no action may be necessary there.

 

I think you miss the point, the railways are something of a special case. Few other employers have a dedicated Police Force tasked with dealing with criminal offences on the network. If the employer can prove a case of theft they should be putting their evidence.

 

This appears to be a direct accusation of theft being used as a means to discipline and ultimately dismiss (for that's what the disciplinary code calls for if theft is alleged) without hard evidence.

 

Meeting that challenge and asking for the evidence to be examined independently is dealing with the job situation first. No evidence, no allegation, no dismissal.

 

We all know just how hard an Industrial Tribunal can be on employers who do not play by the rules I'm sure and I guess that the employer in this case might be reminded of that fact.

 

If the OP has been leading the Forum on, which I don't believe is so having read the thread, but I accept it is a one sided version of events, then the evidence will be crucial in proving a case for dismuissal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its very important to keep your union involved at all times in this. I believe the RMT is a pretty strong union and may help ensure that a fair decision is reached. I don't think you'll get dismissed based on what you've said, I don't think the proof is sufficient, it isn't enough to say you could have done it - they need to prove you actually did it.

 

Also, concentrate not just on that you did your job properly, but emphasise any gaps in procedures, etc. which could demonstrate that someone else could be at fault, if you're able to demonstrate that someone else could conceivably have been to blame you can't reasonably be held to be at fault.

 

If the investigation hasn't been thorough enough, bearing in mind the consequences to you of being dismissed for theft, you might be able to get a court injunction to prevent dismissal until any decision was made regarding a police investigation. I think if police declined to take action based on the available evidence, your employer would have a hard time justifiably dismissing you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to everyone for you comments and help, I have been away from the computer for yesterday and this morning but I am about to start getting hold of BTP and preparing notes for myself.

 

I managed to at last get hold of a union rep yesterday (some off sick, some no longer reps etc so took a while) and he has agreed to represent me at the hearing next week. Im going to use the time before the hearing to methodically think and plan my notes and take into account what BTP say along with all of your helpful advice. I contacted the investigating manager as firstly her letter inviting me to the disciplinary hearing didn't have a time I was supposed to attend and secondly to inform her that I had my rep and who it was, after speaking to my rep he informed me that it is down to work and the roster clerks to arrange for him to be released for the hearing and make him available otherwise it might have to be rescheduled.

 

Ill continue to update on here as I hear more and also when I have prepared notes and spoken to the BTP

 

Thank you again to everyone who has helped so far and given me advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read through this thread I agree with the last few posts.

 

Whilst the employer may have a right to deal with disciplinary matters internally, where such a serious charge is being pursued they must follow the basic premise of 'innocent until proven guilty'.

 

It is one thing to theorise, but an entirely different matter gathering hard evidence to prove a crime.

 

So far as I can see from your thread, there is no credible evidence that you are the perpetrator of a criminal act. The company's booking office accounting systems appear to be insecure and do not protect the individual in addition to the company's revenue, because from what you tell us, these tickets/records appear to be accessible to anyone within the working area.

 

Such records as a shift balance & remittance, including non-issue records should be sealed with a numbered seal and put in a pouch supplied to each individual for the purpose. This pouch should be placed in a drop-safe or other secure location and only opened and checked by the authorised manager / accounts clerk. This process was established in BR days and many TOCs retain it today.

 

I would follow the suggestion made to play them at their own game.

 

As outlined by firstclassx, go to the British Transport Police and advise that you wish to make a statement in relation to an accusation by your employer that you have committed a criminal act namely theft. If the BTP do not want to get involved because they haven't been called in, demand to know why not from your employer. Ask what hard evidence has been collated and whether statements have been taken from all other parties who may have had access to the shift records / balance sheet / tickets /coupons regarding any discrepancies and the procedures in place.

 

The statement by the manager to the effect that "it is my belief that ML gained financially which constitutes theft" does not amount to hard fact, but is only an allegation. Demand to see the hard evidence that you have gained financially.

 

This is an allegation of a very serious criminal offence which may be found to be wholly unfounded once the 'evidence' is examined properly by an independent arbitor such as the Police.

 

Are you a member of RMT or TSSA ?

 

I'm with RMT, arranged my rep now and have just spoken to BTP first contact centre and they are passing on all the details I have given them to the officers who cover my area and told me to expect contact with them in the next few hours to discuss the case.

 

Im hoping I can arrange for one of them to look over it all if not just a decent phone conversation to discuss it all and have some backing on my side

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTP advice is that it has not been reported to them as of yet, they are not willing to take a statement or really comment on the evidence however I had a long conversation about it with a sergeant who was very helpful, I have spoken to a friend at Surrey Police who advised very much the same. Im going to take advantage of a free half hour with a lawyer on Monday and just get their opinion over everything and get them to look at the evidence I've been presented with and also was advised to speak to CAB who have a specialist session with employment lawyers depending on what else will come up.

 

My key points that I have noted so far are:

 

  • There is no evidence to back up the allegation I gained financially from any irregularity (mainly because I didn't but, there is nothing to suggest I did)
  • The items that are said to be missing are not kept in a secure area, not accounted for regularly(taken 4 months to bring up these issues) and a lot of people have access to these, I have worked out a minimum of 15 staff that work in the office plus managers, contractors, agency staff and maintenance staff
  • The missing items sit in a tray for 4 weeks where they are then bundled up and filed in boxes then dumped into an unlocked and easily accessible cabinet for a year
  • There is no evidence to suggest I have taken any tickets to sell on, or taken cash to the value of the missing tickets
  • No statements or interviews have taken place with any other staff etc that have access to where the missing items are stored
  • I am innocent and cannot be proven guilty of being involved in an irregularity to gain financially, theft or anything else as I have not done this.
  • There are many gaps in procedures and items of a cash value (as referred to by the investigating officer) are left out with many people having access to them
  • I am confident in my role, I know I do my job well and that I am not responsible for the irregularities
  • Overall, there is a direct accusation of theft being made to discipline me and ultimately dismiss me without any hard evidence

Many of these things are from all of your kind comments and help and Im sure this list and notes will get longer and more will be added but this is my starting blocks.

 

My union rep is going to be in touch with me soon as well and going to go over everything I have too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raise a grievance with your HR Dept/Line Manager informing them you went to the BTP police station regarding the allegation of theft and no such allegation had been made. Ask why if they believe theft or fraud has been committed, a criminal offence, they haven't reported this to the police.

 

Also query as to whether your employer has asked their Revenue Protection Inspectors to keep a look out for certain tickets with specific serial numbers matching those that are "missing".

 

The Disciplinary procedure should be suspended whilst the grievance is investigated.

 

If they really have no evidence on you, I'd certainly also be looking into Defamation of character.

 

I'd also say that by the employer accusing you (falsely) of criminal theft, that a "breach of trust and confidence" has occurred, and should you resign, you may have a fairly good case going with constructive dismissal.

Edited by firstclassx
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

BTP advice is that it has not been reported to them as of yet, they are not willing to take a statement or really comment on the evidence however I had a long conversation about it with a sergeant who was very helpful, I have spoken to a friend at Surrey Police who advised very much the same. Im going to take advantage of a free half hour with a lawyer on Monday and just get their opinion over everything and get them to look at the evidence I've been presented with and also was advised to speak to CAB who have a specialist session with employment lawyers depending on what else will come up.

 

My key points that I have noted so far are:

 

  • There is no evidence to back up the allegation I gained financially from any irregularity (mainly because I didn't but, there is nothing to suggest I did)
  • The items that are said to be missing are not kept in a secure area, not accounted for regularly(taken 4 months to bring up these issues) and a lot of people have access to these, I have worked out a minimum of 15 staff that work in the office plus managers, contractors, agency staff and maintenance staff
  • The missing items sit in a tray for 4 weeks where they are then bundled up and filed in boxes then dumped into an unlocked and easily accessible cabinet for a year
  • There is no evidence to suggest I have taken any tickets to sell on, or taken cash to the value of the missing tickets
  • No statements or interviews have taken place with any other staff etc that have access to where the missing items are stored
  • I am innocent and cannot be proven guilty of being involved in an irregularity to gain financially, theft or anything else as I have not done this.
  • There are many gaps in procedures and items of a cash value (as referred to by the investigating officer) are left out with many people having access to them
  • I am confident in my role, I know I do my job well and that I am not responsible for the irregularities
  • Overall, there is a direct accusation of theft being made to discipline me and ultimately dismiss me without any hard evidence

Many of these things are from all of your kind comments and help and Im sure this list and notes will get longer and more will be added but this is my starting blocks.

 

My union rep is going to be in touch with me soon as well and going to go over everything I have too

 

 

Spot-on Mark, you have all the major issues identified.

 

There are more suggestions that may be of help, but it is important not to overcomplicate things at this stage

 

Good luck and keep us all posted

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again Mark. I hope you're feeling a bit better about things now.

 

I would just like to voice my appreciation to firstclassx and Old-CodJA for arriving on this thread with rail industry advice for you.

 

Please keep posting to let us know how you are. :)

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great Markl, good luck

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too am very greatful to everyone that has commented and sent me advice, Im still very worried about what is going to happen but planning to get myself in order over the next two days and, with my union rep, plan where to go and hopefully end very well. Im very aware of what Firstclass has said and almost expecting to be dismissed but going to build up the strongest possible case on my side that I can and also looking into the grievance mentioned.

 

In my most positive and best outlook I would love to come back here on Wednesday afternoon with news that I will be returning to work asap, hopefully I can pull this off in the real world too!

 

HB I tried to reply to your PM but it says your inbox is full so wouldn't let me send a reply to you.

 

I'll update tomorrow after speaking to the legal advisor and union rep

 

Thank you again to everyone :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen the lawyer and he's looked over the evidence and said its all very circumstantial and doesn't seem to be any hard facts in it all and he said he would be very surprised if I were to be dismissed over what is in the investigation pack. He also advised to put in a grievance about the investigation and also offered to see me again free of charge if things don't turn out well (not sure if that's a positive outlook or not)

 

I've got to swiftly put together my grievance and get it in tomorrow if I go ahead with it but at a bit of a loss as to where to start and if I should focus on that or build it all into my defence at the hearing?

 

Got a horrible feeling in my stomach and just want this to be over now but know I've got to keep up feeling tougher and get through this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure 100% you start it with

 

Dear Mr. Manager

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT I REQUEST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROCESSED AS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPANY GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

I request the ongoing disciplinary action is suspended pending the outcome of this grievance so as to allow proper and fair examination of the case.

 

(They will try and bully you into dropping the grievance by saying it can all be looked at DURING the disciplinary etc, which is a bit too late by then).

 

Explain the circumstances of your case, what has led up to this point.

Tell them how you feel about the circumstantial evidence

Tell them how it is making you feel, breach of trust, stress, anxiety, made out to be a common thief - defamation of character

Explain what their flaws in the investigation are

Ask why they have not reported it to the police. Give them dates and times of when you went to the police station to clear your name.

You have to be quite polite, but forceful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting worried about tomorrow now as I cant get hold of my rep, he said he would call me on Monday or Tuesday as it had to be arranged for him to be released from normal duties to represent me, I have called the office and they said to attend tomorrow as planned allowing about an hour before the time of the hearing. Has got me very worried and didn't really think the union would be adding to my troubles at this late stage!

 

If for some reason he has not been released from duties do I have the right to ask for the hearing to be adjourned and rescheduled for when he is available?

 

I want this to be over so much and firstly I am still in huge fear and expecting to be dismissed and also now worrying that it could potentially be delayed causing me more stress and worry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a call from my rep, he's not been released from work for tomorrow so is unable to attend despite work being notified on 30th Aug by myself notifying the investigating manager and my rep notifying his roster clerk

 

Work have made no communication with each other to arrange for my rep to be there, I've tried to contact the hearing manager but he didn't answer his phone so a voicemail has been left backed up with an email everything in the voicemail.

 

Its all turning into a huge joke really, 6 weeks off suspended now and finally get to a disciplinary hearing and Ive spent all this time and taken all your advice to prepare myself and they havent even made a call or sent an email at their end,

 

Does anyone have any advice as I really dont want to go to the hearing tomorrow without my rep present

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark,

 

first thing am call union HQ and ask for further guidance.

 

It is entirely reasonable to have the meeting postponed until your rep can attend. Any employer not doing so would find it difficult to defend their actions at ET especially when release was soley within their own power. HQ may be able to a) talk to boss or b) send an alternate.

 

I would NOT go in without your rep!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have to agree with the advice please call the Union HQ ASAP and explain the circumstances of the Rep not being released to attend Disciplinary meeting and that you require a firm date when they will be available.

 

You require this information so that you can ask for a adjourement of the Disciplinary until your Rep is available to attend.

 

Now you also need to inform the Chairperson of the Disciplinary Meeting of your request for an adjournment to the meeting and your reason for the request.

 

After that it is really out of your hands and they will either accept or deny your request.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do also put the request in writing, keep a copy and cc it to the union HQ. Which may put them off playing silly arses with you! Email ok, paper good too. Verbal - no. Ask for thier reason why not in writing also.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...