Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Offered Compromise Agreement - redundancy/unfair dismissal/sex discrimination case


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4214 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Can you give me some advice on dealing with a Compromise Agreement, Please.

 

I got made redundant yesterday (unfair dismissal) and during the meeting was (verbally) offered 3 months salary if I signed a CA. I spoke to my solicitor today and he says it should be more like 12 months due to the severity of the claim and the fact I cant work for 6 months (for a client or competitor - which is virtually everyone).

 

I'm currently unable to even apply for the 2 or 3 roles I'm legally allowed to apply for because of anxiety and depression (due to work related stress). But I can see my former employer ever going as high as 12 months salary.

 

Do I just email them to say NO and let them come back to me if they want? I'm meeting with my solicitor again in 2 weeks to start the ET process. He's suggested sending a Letter Before Action before the ET1 and he'll manage the Compromise Agreement negotiations if there are any.

 

So first step email saying NO or should I be letting them come to me?? Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They've not said anything other than "we'd like to make an offer of 3 months pay in exchange for a CA. Is this something you would be interested in?". I said I'd speak to my solicitor. I didn't have a clue what I should be expecting and knew not to say too much before seeking legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose the best thing is to take the solicitors advice.

There are employment law specialists on the forum who will hopefully look in and offer some further advice if necessary

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

how long have you been there ?

there are set 'minimums' they should offer

 

also THEY should be paying your legal costs too as advised.

 

 

also i think if you accept a CA , you negate any tribunal claims

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been there 7 days less than 2 years!!!! Its a sex discrimination case with hurt to feeling too. I cant work for 6 months and I cant fully qualify as I should have been in 4.5 months time. Whats the minimum for something like that??

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

not really my bag

 

just gathering Info for the troops

when they come.

 

tell us more if you want.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a conversation with your solicitor about it.

 

Remember that if you have a potential ET claim on the grounds of sex discrimination then your employer should be aware of that and a LBA from your solicitor ahead of an ET may very well prompt some movement.

 

It also all depends on what value to the solicitors assess your claim at, I would ask them to put together a schedule of loss for your case and let you know what they assess your claim to be worth if it went to a hearing. That will then start the negotiations.

 

Oh and yes, they should pay the solicitors fees in drawing up a compromise agreement usually around £350+VAT but every firm is different. And yes a compromise agreement negates any employment claim, with the exception of personal injury. You mention work related stress, these claims are very difficult to win but you might want to get advice anyway just so that you know your position.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice.

 

Having spoken to the solicitor and my family I've decided to go all the way to ET. This isn't about money for me so a compromise agreement isn't going to cut it.

 

My solicitor has discussed the LBA but I'll ask for a schedule of loss so I can understand more where I stand.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi D, (hope you don't mind me calling you this)

 

I send you this reply to let you know that I have just won my unfair dismissal case against my ex-employers and it is all worth it, it can get a bit much sometimes, I don't use the word stressful because whatever we have to endure the end results in matters such as this will be satisfactory.

 

If you have a good solicitor, the battle is partly won. I was offered a compromise agreement after I had won the case, I accepted the offer then withdrew it, the remedies hearing was fast approaching where the employment tribunal would decide what my compensation would be, my ex-employers came to their senses and came to the realisation that I would probably get near enough that which I requested, a couple days after I withdrew the accepted offer they came back to me stating that they would up the figure, this figure was what I originally asked for in order to put the matter to rest.

 

If you know that you have been upright and honest in all that you have done, pursue it and be strong. We always say that it is not about the money but when we are honest we will know that the money matters and that it is recognition that we have been treated unfairly.

 

All the best,

 

Lx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks L

 

I've just had a thought....should I be appealing against my dismissal?? There is nothing within the letter to advise me how but should I write to them and ask? I'm sure ET would want me to exhaust this wouldn't they....even though I know its a sham redundancy.

 

Hope you can help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi D,

 

Although the way you were dismissed was not correct, you need to appeal against the decision, your ex-employers should have this system in place, refer to your staff handbook or ask HR to provide you with a copy of their redundancy procedure & policy. ET will ask you this when and if you get to the point of filling out your ET1 form. Also remember that your ET1 form following the appeal decision from your ex-employers need to be with the Employment Tribunal within 3 months of your dismissal.

 

Question, are you paying for legal representation?

 

 

L x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would listen to the solicitor, they are paid to be chess players, and know that any advice that is given which may later come back to bite them will potentially see tham in court as well. So solicitors tend to be ultra cautious.

 

 

I have some experience of employment law cases, and in my opinion compromise agreements are generally something that need serious legal advice, and second opinions before ever agreeing to them. Companies in my experience use them to make problems go away, or to protect themselves from unknown further cost in court wins.

 

 

It's all about risk management..., even the best solicitors can not give you an exact number of what a court will award you. Both defence, and prosecution know this, therefore both sides can only quantify what they know now, rather than what they may be shocked with later.

 

 

I was once awarded a really unusual award, which set UK case law at the time, and was seen across the board as a shock "Novel ruling", which publically embarrased the company, tied them in knots for years to come, and gave me more power to change the workplace than even the most senior of staff.

 

 

Nobody knows what will be in the judges mind, therefore compromise agreements are used to sort issues before anyone does find out what is in the judges head :)

If you cannot take on a problem head on, go around the sides, over the top, or underneath. If you still have problems, then change the rules. If you can't change the rules then manipulate yourself into a position where you make the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm happy to sit it out and see. I've been put through hell because I asked to spend more time with my kids, ended up seriously ill and now I'm just going to sit back and get well rather than stress about what may or may not happen (did that sounds convincing because thats what I've decided I'm doing!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advice needed!

 

I have my grievance meeting tomorrow and I've just received an email telling me that a HR Consultant will be present. I don't want to postpone the meeting because the grievance has already been delayed for 3 weeks by my ex employer BUT this has added to my stress so much. I now feel I have to make sure I've gone over everything with a fine tooth comb and watch everything I say. I've still not got my sleep sorted since I was dismissed and now I know I'll be up all night trying to make sure I'm ready....which will mean I'll be exhausted by the time the meeting comes around.

 

I'm also really disappointed that this HR Consultant wasn't ever brought in or even talked about when I was going through the discrimination or redundancy consultation.

 

I feel I need to tell them this isn't acceptable but also not delay the process any further. Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If you are concerned about HR Consultant being there I would write to them and request clarification as to what the HR Consultants role will be at the meeting.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have said it is just to take notes and make sure that he is following the correct procedure. My issues isn't that she'll be there. I wouldn't have had an issue with it at all, had I have had notice of her being there. My issue is that it has been sprung on me, adding to my stress and making me feel further under pressure. I think it is unreasonable to add this so late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question - after my grievance meeting today my ex employer asked my note taker to send her notes to his note taker so she could make sure everything was included.

 

Should I insist I see them first and they come from me OR should they come from my note taker?

 

Hope you can help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice to you going forward is that you stop stressing about every step of the process you are going through. I am going through a similar issue (ie grievance, but not on sex discrimination basis) with my employer at the moment.

 

DONT GIVE THE GAME AWAY BY LETTING THEM KNOW EVERY TIME THEY MAKE A MISTAKE

 

In your case this means, everytime they make a move that upsets you, you deem to be unfair/in breach of policy,procedure or statute, just make a note of it to yourself... but ALLOW THEM to make the mistake.

 

This then allows you to use the appeal process and have a very strong case for appeal, it is not your job to remind them to treat you fairly, if they were fair, you wouldn't be in this predicament in the first place!

 

Remember, when you get your grievance outcome you then have TWO bases for appeal:

 

a) appeal against outcome (ie if your grievance is not upheld)

b) appeal against procedure (ie, if your grievance is upheld but you are unhappy with the way they have conducted the process)

 

In the case of them making you aware only the day before of this 'HR representative' being present, bear in mind that what the tribunal will look at is whether they have treated you FAIRLY and CONSISTENTLY.

 

So for example.... if they had asked you for 3 days notice in writing of the name of the person you intend to accompany you to this meeting, in order for them to be FAIR and CONSISTENT they must also allow you the same privilege of having 3 days notice. it might seem like a minor discrepancy... but as you said it caused you major distress and a tribunal will not take kindly to it.

 

But like I said, just take it on the chin, with a smile, then KILL 'EM in your appeal letter.... regardless of the outcome.

 

Just don't let this get to you TRUST ME you are just going through the motions and you have a very strong case, it wont last forever.

 

Well done for not accepting crappy 3 MONTHS CA and keeping your dignity intact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send a questionnaire, but that should not stop you from submitting your ET1 asap. They have up to 56 days to reply to a questionnaire, you'll need your claim filed by then, you are looking at a 6-12 mth wait for a hearing anyway.

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...