Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dell Laptop faulty - issued summons - **WON** they coughed fully 1 day short of deadline'


Ash1646
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4308 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening All,

 

I have an issue with Dell and am looking for a bit of advice....Not too sure where I stand.

 

Dell Latitude Z600 still within the 3 year Next business Day Warranty.

Had an issue with the power socket, where the power supply intermittently stopped charging.

 

After 5, yes 5 visits, I have been prvded with a new power supply, which is incorrect. A meesage on the laptop flashes up saying that the charger is the incorrect power configuration.

 

Dell have been for the last month trying to obtain the correct power supply, but it's always out of stock.

 

I had a look at some Dell forums, and although Dell assure me that the continued use of this power supply is not damaging the laptop, the forums tell a different story.

 

As Dell aren't able to supply me with the correct power supply, under the next business day warranty, within a reasonable period of time, am I able to reject goods and demand my money back? (We are talking about a laptop that cost over £2k.)

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a further development with this, and was wondering if someone cold answer a question for me please.

 

Dell have now given up trying to supply a power supply for the laptop, and have suggested a swap.

 

They have offered me a laptop that costs £678.00. Now my laptop cost over £2k. I have queried this disparity, and have received the following response;

When specking up replacement systems we would look at the original systems spec rather than cost as its normally a “like for like” replacement. With technology advancing as rapidly as it does the cost of components when you purchased your system will most likely be different today. I did check though and got the price to be more around £899. Was it the normal XPS you looked at by any chance?

The replacement system does have more memory, a larger HDD ( although not solid state ) , better graphics & PROC.

How would you like to proceed?

Dell are unable to supply me an exact like for like unit. (I have a Dell Z600, ultra slim laptop, and they no longer have anything quite like this anymore.

 

What is being offered is thicker, smaller, and cheaper.

 

Do I have an argument for rejecting this, and request a credit to the value of the original purchase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

Just to keep interested parties involved, I've gone down the road of rejection of replacement offers, and rejection of original laptop based upon the following reason;

 

9 attempted service callouts to rectify the problem, which after three months is still present, which is in breach of the next business day warranty.

Rejection of replacement offers, as over 60% of the original specification of the laptop is not being accounted for.

 

Only sent the letter to Dell this morning, so will keep you all updated if interested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebel,

 

Many thanks for this. Number 10 in your signature looks like a very good read, will give it a good going over once I've finished work today.

 

I used my own version of rejection letter for Dell, which I kept short and to the point, and basically consisted of:

 

They had a reasonable amount of time and visits to attempt repairs. A separate sheet was enclosed to provide the timeline for the events that have taken place.

They had offered to swap the laptop out on a like for like specification but detailed on a separate sheet how the offers, at most consisted of about 20% like for like, and I rebuffed their argument on processor upgrade by quoting Moores Law.

A simple notice of rejection quoting SOGA, and refund request.

Requesting that they respond within 7 days.

 

I purchased the machine 2 and a half years ago, with a 3 Year Next Business Day Warranty.

 

How long ago, I hear you cry!

 

The problem that they have, is that they are no longer able to supply the correct REQUIRED accessory for the unit (Mains Adaptor); What they want me to do is to turn of the warning notifications on the BIOS settings, so that the alert no longer comes up!

 

The essential fact is, that they are unable to perform to the extended warranty provided, or support a product that they manufacture after 2 1/2 years.

 

I realise that there may be an element of recision to be taken into account, due to the age of the machine, but that really doesnt concern me too much, as this will have to take into account the initial cost of the system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. I have a friend of mine looking for the head of EMEA in Dell, so that I can go directly to the person who can make the decision.

 

Will keep the thread updated, in an effort to keep all information open and available to other users.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as an aside...

 

if you want to keep and run the laptop, we used other generic power supplies and we run the lower wattage ones too, that give the bios warning that the psu is not enough power to properly power the lappy.

 

we have never had a failure.

 

+2500 laptops on a very large educational est some 850+ of this or other like dells that produce the same 'issue'

 

we just turn off the bios warning.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Afternoon All.

 

I have some updates for anyone that is still following my fight with Dell.

 

First of all to DX100uk. Thanks for the information, but the actual fault is with both the motherboard as well as with the incorrect power supply.

 

I have been having a conversation with a customer service representative at Dell, since January, and have managed to glean the following information in writing:

 

Dell are no longer willing to come out to me and repair the PC.

Dell have a policy of replacing the laptop on a like for like basis. (Where a specification is not available, they offer the next available upgraded component.) However the like for like PC with the same specification is over £3000.00, and Dell are refusing to offer this as a replacement, because, in their own words, 'it would cost us too much to do'!

Dell have offered a partial refund, saying that my PC has devalued by £25.00 per day.

 

I have refused all of this, and have today issued a summons to Dell, for a full refund plus interest, inconvenience, and costs. (Total £4230.00) (I had a solicitor friend of mine who owed me a favour, and he drafted the paperwork for me, based on inherent fault, not fit for purpose (SOGA).

 

We shall see where we go from here...All fun and games.

 

Bought a MacBook Air, so am no longer using the Dell unit, hence the reason why I've stepped it up a notch now.

 

Will post a copy of the summons on the site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Success.

 

Issued summons to Dell, for the full amount, and they contacted me within 5 days. Initially they offered me £2300.00, as a partial refund, but stuck to my guns, and said see you in court.

 

With 24 hours left to file a defence, they contacted me a again, and offered to settle immediately.

 

The irony to all of this is that they settled back in May, and I still have the laptop! They haven't bothered to collect it, even though I've reminded them a number of times.

 

Never take no for an answer, and if not satisfied call their bluff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...