Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

i was late paying a fine, marstons want fees - but it was paid in full before 1st letter - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi there i hope some one can help me

 

i received a £85 fine for speeding stupid !!

 

i agreed to pay the court 2 installments of £30 and 1 £25

i was late paying one month

so they sent me a letter which i called them and explained why i Had missed the paymen,

we came to an agreement and i paided £30 and i said i would pay the £25 at the end of November ,

 

i paided the £25 on the Saturday the 19 11 2011

then on the Th November this year i received a letter saying they have received the £25 leaving the account clear

but they have issued a enforcement with marston group and because they have issued it they is nothing they can do

and the £25 will clear the fine

but if marston bailifflink3.gif call i will AFT pay ther charges,

 

i rang the court and the first lady was great and said there was problem a mistake and refired me to a fines support man,

after a long chat he abrubly said there is nothing i can do as if he dose return the enforcement he would AFTo do it for everyone,

 

i explained my circumstances

i am a full time carer for my disabled wife recovering from a stroke and bedridden

and very poorly

we receive Dal and carers and income support

,but he said there is nothing i can do,

 

what is the law on this

i was not told they would be sending a bailifflink3.gif

i had paid the fine in full before receiving a letter stating that

 

my wife is at her wits end

please help thanks

 

patty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was that agreed in writing?
no that was over the phone the chap oat the court said i said 4 th november but i sad it would at the end of november, i had already paid the balace of £25 on the saturday over the phone and i received the letter today thursday,i have not had a letter or call yet from marston group only the letter from the court today. thanks patman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow WD on this Formal Complaints, what may happen as has on a couple of threads is the court admins refund your payments, to allow marstons to collect the fine and their fees.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 threads merged

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for all your replys

 

the letter says

 

" your recent payment has been credited to your fine and the authorised enforcemen tagent informed,

they will deduct the amount you have paid from the amount outstanting on the warrant,

how ever once the warrant has been issued the authorised enforcement agent are entitled to collect thier fees assosociated with the exccution of the warrent.

 

payment of the order itsself to hm courts and tribuna lservive will not change this situation and they will continue to enforce agsainst you for the collection of their fees

once the amount due to the court has been paid,"

 

i have not recived a letter or a call from marston yet,

 

im just concerned about them calling and their fees geting higher and higher

when i have already paid the fine to the courts,

 

my wife is very poorly and this is making her worse,

 

thanks for everyones help

 

patman

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was this letter from to clarify things please?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think HMCS have signed up to the National association of Enforcement Agencies 2002 guidelines, and due to your wife's condition she would be classed as vulnerable, which also means you are vulnerable, and as marstons are stressing her, bailiff action is regarded as inappropriate, i would inform the court manager of this and provide proof of vulnerability, viz your wife's condition

 

National Standards for Enforcement Agents align May 2002Vulnerable situations

 

 

  • Enforcement agents/agencies and creditors must recognise that they each have a role in ensuring that the vulnerable and socially excluded are protected and that the recovery process includes procedures agreed between the agent/agency and creditor about how such situations should be dealt with. The appropriate use of discretion is essential in every case and no amount of guidance could cover every situation, therefore the agent has a duty to contact the creditor and report the circumstances in situations where there is potential cause for concern. If necessary, the enforcement agent will advise the creditor if further action is appropriate. The exercise of appropriate discretion is needed, not only to protect the debtor, but also the enforcement agent who should avoid taking action which could lead to accusations of inappropriate behaviour.
  • Enforcement agents must withdraw from domestic premises if the only person present is, or appears to be, under the age of 18; they can ask when the debtor will be home - if appropriate.
  • Enforcement agents must withdraw without making enquiries if the only persons present are children who appear to be under the age of 12.
  • Wherever possible, enforcement agents should have arrangements in place for rapidly accessing translation services when these are needed, and provide on request information in large print or in Braille for debtors with impaired sight.
  • Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:
    • the elderly;
    • people with a disability;
    • the seriously ill;
    • the recently bereaved;
    • single parent families;
    • pregnant women;
    • unemployed people; and,
    • those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be able to resubmit your question as there are typo problems with the dates. You have said that you paid the court on 19th November and that you then received a letter on Te November.

 

[EDIT]. frankly, the administration of these court fines BY THE MAGISTRATES COURTS is a cause of great concern. You would be surprised to know that EVERY DAY we received an IDENTICAL query as yours. If many case, payment has been made to the court using their own online payment facility and it is found that their own payment facility does not credit the payment for 7 days !!!

 

If you are in arrears with repayment of a court FINE, then there is a legal requirement that the Court MUST sent to you a Further Steps Notice which is to advise you that UNLESS the arrears or fine are paid that ANY of the Further Steps as outlined in the FSN will taken if the the arrears are not paid within 14 days of the date of the FSN.

 

I have seen many cases where the payment was made a day or two late and yet, the court are refusing to stop the process and instead, "claim" that there is nothing that can be done.

 

From so many cases that I have seen, the likes of Philips, Swift, Marston and Excel ( the 4 companies with Contracts to enforce these unpaid Magistrates Court fines) do not even receive the Distress Warrants until around 2 weeks AFTER the court are claiming that a Distress Warrant has been issued.

 

Where I have concerns is that the court SHOULD he able to have some degree of discretion. This is UTTER nonsense. The FINE has been paid in Full.

 

Another point is that this scenario will ultimately lead to people like you, making complaints against the ENFORCEMENT COMPANY , which in your case is Marston Group. So far, the bailiff company have done nothing wrong but they would not know that you had paid and neither would they be aware that your circumstances are clearly classed as "vulnerable" in accordance with the National Standards for Enforcement Agents.

 

You certainly have grounds for complaint but this should NOT be against the bailiff firm but should be directed to the Court Manager at the Magistrates Court.

If an initial letter is sent to you, then Marston Group will request administration fees of just £75. I am sure that Marston Group would see that there has been some injustice on the part of the Court and if the background to this query was given to them, they would very likely return the warrant back to the court. A letter needs to be sent to Marston's first thing on the morning.

 

Please try not to worry. I will post back in the morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there i hope some one can help me i received a £85 fine for speeding stupid !! anyway i agreed to pay the court 2 installment's of £30 and 1 £25, i was late paying one month so they sent me a letter which i called them and explained why i Had missed the payment, we came to an agreement and i paided £30 and i said i would pay the £25 at the end of November , i paided the £25 on the Saturday the 19 11 2011 then on the 25th November 2011 this year i received a letter saying they have received the £25 leaving the account clear but they have issued a enforcement with marston group and because they have issued it they is nothing they can do and the £25 will clear the fine but if marston bailiffs call i will afto pay their charges, i rang the court and the first lady was great and said there was proberly a mistake and revered me to a fines support man, after a long chat he abruptly said there is nothing i can do, as if he returns the enforcement he would after do it for everyone, i explained my circumstances, i am a full time carer for my disabled wife recovering from a stroke and bedridden and very poorly but he said there is nothing i can do, what is the law on this i was not told they would be sending a bailiff i had paid the fine in full before receiving a letter stating that my wife is at her wits end please help thanks patty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks patman, I think as tomtubby has alluded to you have paid in full, but have fallen victim to a 7 day clearence, I would follow tomtubby on this and contact the court manager, and send an email, and a hard copy by post to marstons asap.

 

Don't worry, you are in safe hands with tomtubby on the case.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem TT, where there is blatant incompetence/unlawful application of fees, the authorities must feel the full rigour of complaints in the hope that one day they will get it right.

 

Debts should be paid, but not with the addition of spurious, and/or unlawful fees

 

BN

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Patman,

 

I have sent you a message.

 

hi i have sent you a reply at bailiffs, sorry for the delay thanks patman

 

Tomtubby, Why have you sent a message, what is so secret about this that it cannot be said in the open forum ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have plenty of experience here!

 

I just finished going through this exact experience which nearly ruined my life, my marriage and my mental health.

 

It's a nightmare I wish upon noone.

Don't worry.

If you have paid the fine to the court then you do not owe bailiff anything. Not a sausage.

They ARE entitled to collect fees and entitled to keep it if you give it to them they are NOT entitled to enforce any action to get you to pay it.

You legally do not owe it. Make sense?

 

It's in the HMCS guidline/handbook (its online, although I don't know where exactly) to encourage you to pay the bailiff

and to allow the bailiff to take any steps necessary within the law or not to retrieve their "fees" even though the the person owing is not resposible for fees.

 

It's beyond belief, but its there in black and white!!

My jaw hit the floor when I saw that!

Basically it keeps the bailiffs sweet and gives them incentive to continue working for the HMCS. True!

 

So the bailiff will show up huff, puff and do whatever.

He'll lie, say he's going to take your belongings, tell you a removal truck is "on its way", even say he's going to arrest you himself with a warrant he's gotten from the courts.

 

Ours even went so far as to removed the air from my car tyre and claim it was "immobilized" until we paid up!!!

 

I cannot say this strongly enough....DON'T BELIEVE THEM!

They have no powers to do anything whatsoever, providing you have given them no money and have not let them into your home.

Let him huff and puff, stay strong.

Keep your vehicles safe.

They may not have powers to seize goods but they WILL tamper with them or try and clamp them to persuade you to pay.

 

If they do, just call the police. They clear off pretty quick when you do that!

 

I wrote a letter of complaint to the court manager and recieved a reply a week later telling me swiftly where i could sod off to.

I copied my complaint to Marstons, so told me the Bailiff denied everything and they believe them.

The were however no longer persuing me for the fines.

Gee thanks.

 

Unfortunately, all you can do is stay strong.

Eventually, he will give up when he realizes your not paying even if he may make your life hell in the interim.

 

I'm writing a letter to my MP to strongly suggest that such appalling and illegal behaviour (sactioned by our own HMCS no less) be stopped!!!

 

Phone Debtline or Citizen's Advice. They'll back you up and also put your mind at ease that you're in the right.

 

Hang in there!!

Edited by DeeDee401
Link to post
Share on other sites

well done

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...