Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC/Rockwell DCA - Urgent advice needed please :-(


maud26
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4593 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I am writing on behalf of a very good friend who had been receiving hassling phone calls at work from a DCA (Rockwell). When i enquired as to why she was avoiding the calls she explained that they were a DCA who were calling continuously about a debt she had incurred whilst with her previous partner, he had left her with two children to cope on her own with a joint debt of just under 10k. I asked her to bring in a letter from the DCA and offered to send a CCA request and also a harrassment by telephone letter which i did just over 2 months ago. They promptly wrote back declaring:

 

'We can confirm that the account assigned to our above named client relates specifically to a current account and as such is not regulated under the CCA 1974. Due to the nature of this account there is no written agreement to provide.

 

The enclosed statement showing repayments is your acceptance of liability'

 

So when I read this i questioned her further and she described what i can only interpret as a 'consolidation loan' offered to them by HSBC, she has since provided a statement from March 2010 which describes it as a 'Managed Loan Account'.

 

Now Rockwell are still making calls despite the letter i sent them, and i wonder where we can go from here. The previous partner has left her with two children, one on the way and pays not a single penny whatsoever and she is frightened to death of the DCA turning up on her doorstep. Is there anything we can do now??

 

Thank you in advance

 

Maudy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, an HSBC managed loan.. these are presenting quite a few issues. If it is a loan, then you are entitled to see the agreement.

 

However, if it is a current account then there simply wont be one.

 

You could send a Subject Access request, which should net you all the information in respect of your friend's financial history with the bank. It will cost you £10.00 and you will find a draft letter in the CAG library.. linked in green at the top of the screen. the company is allowed 40 calendar days to respond to the SAR. You send it to HSBC.. not the DCA.

 

I am assuming the ex is not around to help pay this off? Do you know if the ex is being chased as well ?

 

Rest assured that the DCA has no power of entry if they were to turn up on the doorstep. In theory they are not permitted to do so without an appointment and I assume your friend is unlikely to give permission. In the event that someone does turn up. Just ask them to go away.. There is a draft letter in the CAG library to send in respect of doorstep visit :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

These managed loans are starting to

crop up a lot are from the period

just after the banks failed, consolidating

a current account and overdraft into a loan

and ''managing'' the use (to thee benefit of the bank of course)

there should be a confirmatory agreement of some sort

I think.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for your reply. No the ex is not around - he doesn't help her financially or any other way and i think communications have broken down and so she is not aware if he is being pursued for it. She has explained to DCA that its a joint debt and they don't seem to care. So do you think the only option is to send the SAR? - Is this the only way we can find out if its a loan or account?

 

Thank you once again

 

Maudy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with citizen B that you should

do the SAR it's probably the only way

to get the information required.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiAt work today and my friend has bought in some paperwork relating to the DCA info - its an arrears notice from HSBC dated March 2010 and clearly states that 'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974' and goes on to quote that it relates to a credit agreement...... Does this mean that it IS a credit agreement and therefore we do have the right to pursue the CCA request??Failing that SAR will be done this evening lol :-)Many ThanksMaudy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

A loan will be subject to CCA 1974, an OVERDRAFT

is not so regulated as it is described as a facility.

I f it is a regulated agreement the you can do a CCA

request, a SAR can be done at any time on any form of account.

So you can do both, as they are not obliged to send a copy

agreement with a SAR.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the thread about O/D's and the CCA, it's a long one so put the kettle on first!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?237096

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiAt work today and my friend has bought in some paperwork relating to the DCA info - its an arrears notice from HSBC dated March 2010 and clearly states that 'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974' and goes on to quote that it relates to a credit agreement...... Does this mean that it IS a credit agreement and therefore we do have the right to pursue the CCA request??Failing that SAR will be done this evening lol :-)Many ThanksMaudy xx

 

If they are issuing an arrears notice under the CCA1974 then yes it is covered under CCA1974 and there should be an agreement. I think the clue is in the Title.. "Managed LOAN" :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi again

Thanks for getting back to me - it takes me a while in between posts as Im currently undergoing chemo so apologies for the delay.

So what do you think I should send now - pursue the CCA as the letter does indeed state 'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974' - i guess i could enclose a copy of this said letter along with a CCA request???

 

Or should i send a SAR?

 

Thank you to everyone who replied - i appreciate it so much as does my lovely friend

 

Maudy xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to hear of your priority battle, that should be foremost in your concerns, not these tin pot good for nothing con artists, I guarantee that all of them would agree that money is far more important than health as far as they are concerned! Fools.

 

Anyhow, this gives you something to do I guess, and you could send them the CCA request in light of your last couple of posts, see what they come back with....if you need the link to it just ask.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sound advice from Boo - further to that, my suggestion would be that before the SAR you could try:

 

Sent By Royal Mail Recorded Delivery

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Account Reference: 123456789

 

In your letter, dated xx/xx/xx you stated that you were under no obligation to provide me with information regarding the above account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 as the account is considered not to be covered by that Act.

 

In your subsequent letter, informing me of the arrears on the above account, you clearly state: "'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974" which is a clear, written admission that the account is covered by the Act.

 

I therefore require you to comply with my previous formal request for the relevant information.

 

(If you haven't already sent a £1 PO):

I enclose a Postal Order for the statutory amount of £1 to cover the fee for the request of a CCA, which must only be used for that purpose. If you are unable to comply with my request, you should inform me in writing, returning the payment.

 

(If you have already sent the £1 PO):

On xx/xx/xx I sent you a Postal Order for the statutory amount of £1 to cover the fee for the request of a CCA, which must only be used for that purpose. If you are unable to comply with my request, you should inform me in writing, returning the payment.

 

I look forward to your written response.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I'm sure others will be able to suggest better wording, but the above might save your friend a tiny bit of money before trying a SAR.

 

I'd also be inclined to enclose the "In writing only" and "No doorstep visits" letters in the same envelope - keep a copy of everything and never answer the phone to them or give "security details" - keep everything in writing so you have a very definite paper trail/proof.

 

Hope that helps and best of luck with both your health and your mission to help your friend.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halibutt, that sounds like a good plan and your letter is sound :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...