Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
    • Thanks for uploading the appeal.  It was a waste of time but well done in not outing the driver. Why have your friends paid £60 they don't owe to a private company that have no means of making them pay as they don't do court?  If they paid by card, as I presume they did, they should get on to their bank and do a chargeback immediately. We call the £70 the Unicorn Food Tax.  The law specifically states they are only allowed to charge the original £100 but the PPCs and their bezzies in their trade associations allow this made-up extra £70 so £100 becomes £170.  Unfortunately for them the law doesn't. Anyway, snotty letter time. Their is an example in post 32 here you can tweak as it's the same company but a different car park   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/463964-alliance-anpr-pcn-lease-car-appeals-refused-daymer-bay-cornwall/page/2/#comments  
    • Thank god you're not a part of the tribunal! Terribly biased and negative.  HR isn't all knowing. And this case proves it. Thanks again for your opinion.  I'm not going to court because of a few emails, I'm going to court because the head of HR has invented a PCP solely for me, which no other employee is made to sit. The language used in the emails is discriminatory and inflammatory.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA Credit card debt/ charges reclaim


mikesmotor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3981 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

5 threads merged.

 

if its an active credit card then every month.

 

what is the status of the account.

inotice looking back at your many thread on MBNA and merging them here to one thread

 

that you were going the reclaim etc etc

 

did you do that?

 

whom and what are you paying now?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I've just received a letter from this Bryan Carter crowd regarding a desputed credit card debt from MBNA being handled by Fredrickson International. From research I have made it would seem that Bryan Carter is just anther section of Fredrickson International, does anybody else have information regarding that. In any case i was under the impression that a debt collection agency cannot act on behalf of a creditor with a notice of assignment (NoA) and also that the agency cannot pass on these matters to another party while the matter is in depute. I would be interested to know if anyone has experience of this.

 

Regards

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Mike.

 

I've started a new thread for you.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mikesmotor. Ive had the same garbage from Freds and then Carters. One very good idea is to send Carters a CCA Request - they do not like ANY form of resistance or to be made aware that a particular customer ( or "mug" - in DCA speak) may just know his/her legal rights.

They very often return the file back to the DCA with which the debt ( or Assignment of) lies.

Unfortunately this isnt the end of it. It just gets passed to the next DCA who starts the whole process (threats) again.

Be prepared to send lots of "in dispute" letters, all by recorded delivery of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops sorry - hit the "post" button by mistake!

The reality is that it doesnt seem to matter what might be legal or not.

What really happens is that no matter how you stop a particular DCA or "solicitor" from taking an action, all they do is bundle it up and flog it on to the next bunch of creeps.

Damned annoying I know, but even if you have seen half a dozen of these leeches off, you have to keep on the ball because the next low-life might just go for the CCJ if they think they might just get away with it.

So to my mind ( and experience) you can challenge a DCA on all kinds of things ( NOA etc) and probably beat them - but all that will happen after all your hard work is they will sell it to another DCA and you will literally have to start all over again.

Just keep it simple. CCA Request then Account in Dispute letter.

Then do the same with the next one.

And the next.................

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just sent a letter to Bryan Carter telling them that they need to speak to their so called clients Fredricson International. If that dosn't work I'll go down the CCA route. Incidently I've done a bit of further reaserch and it would seem strange to me that a firm of solicitors would (a) work on a Saturday (b) not include their phone number on their corresspondence and © have their offices on a warehouse trading estate next to the Brooklands race track. All very strange when you consider that Fredrickson International's postal address is the post office in Weybridge high street. I am very suspicious that Bryan Carter are a genuine firm of solicitors.

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

they don't need a notice of assignment if the account has been passed for collection,the most important thing to do is send a letter of dispute giving clear reasons' to fredrickson international recorded delivery and stating that you will defend any action that they pursue.my experience when faced with this the account is then handed back to the original creditor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just sent a letter to Bryan Carter telling them that they need to speak to their so called clients Fredricson International. If that dosn't work It won't.... I'll go down the CCA route. As soon as possible, by rec. delivery. Incidently I've done a bit of further reaserch and it would seem strange to me that a firm of solicitors would (a) work on a Saturday (b) not include their phone number on their corresspondence and © have their offices on a warehouse trading estate next to the Brooklands race track. All very strange when you consider that Fredrickson International's postal address is the post office in Weybridge high street. I am very suspicious that Bryan Carter are a genuine firm of solicitors.

 

Mike

 

 

Bryan Carter are in the same building as Freds. and whatever you send through to them will end up with Freds. You may need to raise a formal complaint with BC if he/they play silly b*ggers with your CCA request. They are a tenacious bunch who seem to like threastening (and using) the court process to intimidate.... but not impossible to get rid of as long as you are pro-active.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decided not to wait, sent CCA today.

 

Mike

 

Recorded Delivery right? If not you can guarantee they "never recieved" it. Give it the 12 days then send the "in dispute" letter and keep copies of your letters and print-off the signature from the Royal Mail site. There you have your evidence for failure to comply should one of these chancers attempt further steps in the future.

My file on a particular debt is now an inch thick because of Lowells, Freds and then Carters. Even after Lowells writing and stating their client does not hold an Agreement, they have, up to now, sent a further 5 letters demanding payment and threatening court action.

Needless to say, I have all letters for if they or anyone else attempts Court action somewhere down the line.

Havent bothered to tell them that its well Statute Barred by now - just me playing by the DCAs rules:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

I've just received a letter from Fredricson International in reply to my CCA request. They've sent back my postal order saying that I must go direct to MBNA (their clients) with this matter. I'm not sure that this is correct buit I would be gratefull for any advice here.

 

Regards

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish! The CCA request goes to the company chasing you - it is up to them respond to it and get the correct documentation and they know this! They keep doing this. Send them the Account in Dispute letter- amended- as they have indicated that they are not prepared to honour this request when it is clearly their responsibility to do this. And send copies with a complaint to OFT.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I not wait the 12+2 days before sending this letter? Incidentally they've (Fred. Int.) gone on to say they have plced my account on 28 day hold to allow me to go to MBNA then they will continue their collection activies.

 

Regards

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - up to you - refer to the letter and just it make it very clear to them that you have made the request to them and it is their responsibility to refer this to their client

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just plain laziness if you want the CCA

send to MBNA and tell them that Freds wouldn't

process it.

The are no doubt claiming they are not the

creditor in this case, a situation that is soon

to be resolved.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fredrickson of course this is a regular occurrence with

CCA requests sent to them, they are totally uncooperative,and claim that

they are not the creditor so they don't have to do anything it's largely

pointless to try and get any result from them.:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few threads on here were Freds have done this - it is laziness on theiir part and should be reported to OFT as it actually constitutes harassment. I do not see why you should run around after credit agreements - if Freds/BC want to chase you they must provide the documents themselves!!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a letter back from Freds Int ref my CCA request. They've said that I need to contact MBNA 9the debt originators) with the CCA and they've sent me back the postal ordert that I had made out to them. They have also mentioned that they have put my "account"on hold for twenty eight days in order to give me time to contact MBNA. Anybody got any ideas where to go next.

 

Regards

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, go back to Freds to tell them it is their responsibility not yours to contact MBNA.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...