Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank extended overdraft to unmanagable amount despite me being on benefits


kaytee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4722 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi new to this site and hope to find help, i was offerd a over draft on my account of a few hundred pound which i used a few year ago when moveing home due to haveing my first child, i got to the point where i was struggling and askd for my over draft to be extended by another 100 pound, i was told they could not offer me just hunderd i had to get the limited amount which was £1200 bareing in mind they knew i was on benifits and would take time to pay it back. so thinking i wouldnt use that amount i accepted and just take out what i needed, times got hard and slowly i fell into the whole debt, then within time they started charging me intrest fees and giving me charges... my only income was my benifits which was for me and my son to live off..food, bills, clotheing BUT as soon as my benifits were payed into my bank natwest snached it, they took payments out of my bank for the charges and some weeks i was left with absolutly nothing... still to this day they want me to pay it back but can i not do anything to claim the benifits they took? in the end i had to change bank but still not happy :( natwest left me and my son with nothing, i had to pawn in gold which was bought as presents just so i could buy gas n electric and basic food... hard times!! can i not do anything to claim that money bak? plz help

Edited by MARTIN3030
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi new to this site and hope to find help, i was offerd a over draft on my account of a few hundred pound which i used a few year ago when moveing home due to haveing my first child, i got to the point where i was struggling and askd for my over draft to be extended by another 100 pound, i was told they could not offer me just hunderd i had to get the limited amount which was £1200 bareing in mind they knew i was on benifits and would take time to pay it back. so thinking i wouldnt use that amount i accepted and just take out what i needed, times got hard and slowly i fell into the whole debt, then within time they started charging me intrest fees and giving me charges... my only income was my benifits which was for me and my son to live off..food, bills, clotheing BUT as soon as my benifits were payed into my bank natwest snached it, they took payments out of my bank for the charges and some weeks i was left with absolutly nothing... still to this day they want me to pay it back but can i not do anything to claim the benifits they took? in the end i had to change bank but still not happy :( natwest left me and my son with nothing, i had to pawn in gold which was bought as presents just so i could buy gas n electric and basic food... hard times!! can i not do anything to claim that money bak? plz help

 

Hi Kaytee

 

I feel you will get more adquete advice in relation to your direct circumstances you outlined in your post by having a thread of your own. So i have notified the site team to come along and move your post into its own thread - From there you will get the advice you need in relation to your issue with natwest.

 

One point i would note is by giving you £1200 overdraft instead on £100 as you request and were subsquently refused for in favour of a limit of £1200 - Then i would say they were acting in breach of section 25 (2B) of the consumer credit act 1974 as amended in the consumer credit act 2006 amendments to the 1974 act. Which came into force in April 2008.

 

So when did you ask for the overdraft - Before or after april 2008?

 

Though there is a couple of court cases that are going to test the Lawfulness or fairness of bank charges later this year, and they have been discribed as being cases that are indefensible in regards to the banks trying to defend against. So the out come of those cases are looking in consumer favour and will, hopefully, if successful entitle you to reclaim such charges.

Edited by teaboy2

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank can offset from one account to another,but if they are aware that a persons income is bade uo solely of benefit

they should not touch it.

Your problem is I think that you may have left it to long to complain and would have difficulty claiming it back.

Others may be able to help when they are available.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kaytee,welcome to the site.

Have created a thread of your own and moved here.

From what you say so far,it does seem that the bank have been reckless and failed in their obligations to follow codes of practice,and fair business practices.

In fact their actions here could also be viewed as them creating an unfair relationship.

We need to establish how this was done and what supporting evidence you have.

Can you please answer the following questions;

1.Have you been in rec of benefits for the duration of all your complaints ?

 

2.When did you first make them aware that you were on benefits,and how was this done ?

 

3.What was their response when you contacted them and how was this done ?

 

4.What was the timeframe between you alerting them of financial difficulties and them responding and how was this done ?

 

5.Do you have a log of dates / any letters that support the complaint/the way they were dealing ?

 

6.When they extended the overdraft-how long was it before they took charges from this-and what was the amounts ?

 

7.Have you been refunded with any charges at all on this account ?

 

8.If you have not had any charges refunded,did you make a request for this and when/how was this done ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kaytee,welcome to the site.

Have created a thread of your own and moved here.

From what you say so far,it does seem that the bank have been reckless and failed in their obligations to follow codes of practice,and fair business practices.

In fact their actions here could also be viewed as them creating an unfair relationship.

We need to establish how this was done and what supporting evidence you have.

Can you please answer the following questions;

1.Have you been in rec of benefits for the duration of all your complaints ?

 

2.When did you first make them aware that you were on benefits,and how was this done ?

 

3.What was their response when you contacted them and how was this done ?

 

4.What was the timeframe between you alerting them of financial difficulties and them responding and how was this done ?

 

5.Do you have a log of dates / any letters that support the complaint/the way they were dealing ?

 

6.When they extended the overdraft-how long was it before they took charges from this-and what was the amounts ?

 

7.Have you been refunded with any charges at all on this account ?

 

8.If you have not had any charges refunded,did you make a request for this and when/how was this done ?

 

 

My opinion is that you need to be doing a full Subject Access request even if you do already have some info.

The reason being that this should get everything needed to take them on with this and put together a case with the proof.

The SAR will need to be very specific so they will HAVE to provide the evidence needed.

Once you have that,they can be put on notice that you will refer it to the FOS,who from what you have told,will almost certainly uphold in your favour.

Before this,its a case of getting together the material docs that will establish their failures.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You didnt have to use the overdraft? If you are of sane mind, I think you should have to pay back what you borrowed. That's just me though, the country is in a bad way partly because people didn't pay back what they borrowed from it. But I do know of one person that had credit card debts of 15k & used the argument that they were on benefits when they were given these credit cards.

On the ball enough to go bancrupt & have the debts written off, but not enough to not spend it in the first place. It does seem to work that one, so you'll probably be ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they must have known because the payments state that its from the dwp and say jobseekers allowance,it looks like another case of irresponsible lending.normally basic accounts do not have overdraft facilities but if you on the system as being on benefits there isnt any justification for lending like this.

 

www.lendingstandardsboard.org.uk/docs/lendingcode.pdf

 

i natwest left me and my son with nothing, i had to pawn in gold which was bought as presents just so i could buy gas n electric and basic food... hard times!! can i not do anything to claim that money bak? plz help

 

the financial onbudsman service would be able to help if the explanation is not what it should be,look into the cputr also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"You didnt have to use the overdraftlink3.gif? If you are of sane mind, I think you should have to pay back what you borrowed."

 

jadeybags,the op has not come here to be lectured on their sanity,or the ethics of making financial decisions.

Please keep your comments to helping or offering advice,or dont post here at all.

  • Confused 2

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creditors have to take some of the blame, they offered credit like it was going out of fashion. In a nutshell, they never checked peoples ability to pay back the money. The creditors should of said 'no'. That brings us to the 'cart before the horse'. Many years ago it took 2 weeks to get a £500 loan, today it

takes 3 seconds, infact they send you pre-filled cheques with £500 printed on them.

 

You didnt have to use the overdraft? If you are of sane mind, I think you should have to pay back what you borrowed. That's just me though, the country is in a bad way partly because people didn't pay back what they borrowed from it. But I do know of one person that had credit card debts of 15k & used the argument that they were on benefits when they were given these credit cards.

On the ball enough to go bancrupt & have the debts written off, but not enough to not spend it in the first place. It does seem to work that one, so you'll probably be ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO the bank was wrong giving so much of an overdraft when a much lesser amount was asked for. But I don't think being on benefits should automatically stop a person having an overdraft.

 

I agree. I've personally had no problems with that - I asked for £200 OD and got the £200. Although, could've got up to £500.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"You didnt have to use the overdraftlink3.gif? If you are of sane mind, I think you should have to pay back what you borrowed."

 

jadeybags,the op has not come here to be lectured on their sanity,or the ethics of making financial decisions.

Please keep your comments to helping or offering advice,or dont post here at all.

 

Hint taken, & understood....

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO the bank was wrong giving so much of an overdraft when a much lesser amount was asked for. But I don't think being on benefits should automatically stop a person having an overdraft.

 

its the reckless way amounts are given,people on benefits are more likely to be exposed to the consequences "charges" its unfair.benefits and banks don't go it can be said exclusion but there are risks using them with the results such as here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. I was told I'm not entitled to a credit card (don't want one anyway) because my income isn't high enough.

 

you were fortunate nystagmite,however there are many cases where checks have not been carried out and there has been irresponsible lending, todays economic situation is all down to this.

 

all of a sudden the "borrower" "customer" becomes the "defaulting debtor".

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Katee

 

I will see you at work and try to help you with this.

 

Katee is not trying to shirk her debt. I know her personally and she has just secured permanent employment with the NHS>

 

It was I that directed her to this site as I thought she would get help with the fact that her benefits were appropriated to repay an overdraft. I thought that benefits couldn't be touched? But I could be wrong ...

 

All this happened a few years ago so am not sure where she would stand in a regards to a claim or what template letter to send ?

 

I am going to draft her a complaint to the FSO when I return from holiday and she has fished out all the paperwork and hope to get some real help here rather than any sarcastic, unhelpful comments. Thanks for all sensible replies so far.

 

Keep your chin up Katee and look at the good advice on here.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fernack,thanks for directing Katee to the CAG.

When you say it was a long time ago -how long exactly ?

We need some questions answered if poss the ones I posted.

The FOS will need all supporting docs if they are to investigate,which is why its very important to have a good paper trail.

They would also need to see that Katee brought this to the banks attention at the time and they did nothing or else refused to answer her complaints positively.

It may be an idea once she has everything to do a preliminary letter to the bank asking them for an explanation,and if they do not agree that their actions were not in keeping with their obligations.

This would also serve as part of what the FOS would want to be looking at.

Some of the things Kayee complains of would have been covered under the old BBA banking and lending codes of practice.

Insofar as time limits,the FSA handbook says that in some situations they can look into complaints that arise from issues up to 3 years after the complainant becomes aware they have a case to complain about-if the original issues fall outside of 6 years.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent Katee a message and told her to check back here and to do a SAR. I dont know the full details as we got to discussing it at work yesterday and am now on holiday for 2 weeks. Katee is also at work today. She is new to the site and probably wont know how to navigate properly around the site. I will help her with letters etc as much as I can when I get back. I think she needs direct guidance as to what letters to send to whom at the moment. Thank you for input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok first we need to know which bank it was.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah thanks-missed it.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...