Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC signs up 10 DCAs following mega-tender - 26/05/2011


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Absotivly Posolutly!! bunch of bandits :jaw::!:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I owe money to HMRC, wonder how long it will be before the DCA's start sending me even more love letters than they do already :oops:

Have £20k+ in debt, seriously want to be debt free, currently in temporary accomodation and having business problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the bit

"an offer to pay by installment that we are able to accept"

Whats the betting they will not be able to accept what ever amount is offered

 

I am waiting to see how long before members are posting on here about demands for non-existent debts to HMRC

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount is around 1.5 K and I was informed that installments could last no longer than 3 months, so even if my sister paid all of her state pension and pension credit over to them every week it would still not clear the 'debt' in 3 months, so she is 'doomed'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pity it is not credit solutions that sent the threat-o-gram

 

Three of the four DCAs used in a previous HMRC debt collection pilot project have been retained - iQor, Fairfax and CCS Collect. It is believed the fourth, Credit Solutions, was not retained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Just read this on Credit Today...Haven't Apex been selected by HMRC!

Just goes to show what an industry this is.....****!!

OFT warning to debt management firms - 27/05/2011

 

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has warned debt management firms that their licenses will be revoked if they do not operate within guidelines and withhold cash from creditors.

 

The comments come following a BBC investigation that alleged some firms held on to clients' cash rather than paying it to creditors in a bid to secure lower settlements.

 

David Fisher, OFT director of consumer credit, said businesses that operated a full final settlement model had a responsibility to tell consumers what they were doing with their money.

 

"We would be very concerned should a business mislead consumers," he said. "This would call into question its fitness to operate.

 

"We have warned the industry that it needs to improve its business practices and in June 2011 we will publish further guidance setting out the standards we expect of businesses that we license."

 

The BBC alleges that in one case Bolton-based Global Debt Solutions offered to arrange a repayment plan for £40,000 of credit card debt and loans but did not pass the money paid over to creditors.

 

As a result the creditors took the couple who had used the firm’s services to court, resulting in County Court Judgements against them.

 

Global Debt Solutions, which became 3 Step Finance, has since been shut down by the Insolvency Service.

 

Another company, Apex Debt Counselling & Management, is also named in the investigation as having withheld money from creditors.

 

Industry guidelines state that any money taken from debtors should be passed on to creditors within five working days.

 

Lisa Colclough, national money advice policy and development manager at Citizens Advice (CA) that offers free debt advice to consumers, said that some firms offered a useful service that people were prepared to pay for but a lack of regulation provided a fertile breeding ground for rogue operators.

 

"We continue to see far too many people whose debt problems have been made much worse by the high fees and poor service of some debt management companies - including cases where money is not passed on to creditors," she said.

 

The CA is calling for the Consumer Credit Act and data protection legislation to be updated to tackle these problems and has made a super complaint to the OFT calling for a ban on cold calls and upfront fees. A response is expected from the OFT next week.

Edited by twoman
DELETE PICKIE
Link to post
Share on other sites

My sister had another letter this morning for CCS saying they were now chasing a second amount!!! I assume there can only be one amalgamated debt to HRMC? The first claim amount covers all the period since she became 60 up to date so who knows now where this second claim is coming from. Sadly she is now in a very distressed state and we do not know who to turn to next. It has been confirmed by a voluntary company helping 'older' people with tax affairs, that all her assessment are wrong and she owes much, much less than they are claim, the charity has written to them with her new calculations which HMRC are just ignoring. She is too ill and disabled to ever deal with this herself or appear in Court.

 

How did she get in debt - well originally when she was first eligible for State Pension they sent the gross amount to Pension Credit who topped her allowances up to the basic minimum. Apparantly this is wrong as they should have sent the net figure after taking into account what her liability to tax on her state pension would be. This has happened over 5 years, hence she now owes the tax from the minimum guaranteed pension income, which should have included an amount to cover this tax. So, basically the State Pension Office owe this money to HMRC but my sister is the piggy in the middle, we have proof of this, and have sent reams of paperwork to all concerned with copies of everything. No one has bothered to come back to her even though they were all sent Recorded. I think we either have to see our MP or write and send the lot to David Cameron to sort out!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't want to alarm anybody but are friends at CABOT are involved in this,

 

AnaCap buys Cabot Financial from Citi - 08/04/2011

 

AnaCap Financial Partners (“AnaCap”), the European private equity firm that specialises in the financial services sector, acquires Cabot Financial, the consumer debt purchasing firm, from Citi.

 

The purchase will create the UK’s biggest debt purchasing and collection business as AnaCap will integrate Cabot Financial with Apex Credit Management, another market leading debt purchasing and collections agency that is already owned by AnaCap’s funds.

 

Cabot Financial purchases consumer debt from financial institutions and other credit providers that no longer wish to manage that debt internally.

 

Apex manages debt on a contingent basis and also purchases debt from credit providers no longer wanting to manage it internally.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your right a DCA has no formal power, however HMRC does, so they will use this to chase and harrass under the guise of working for the HMRC, what is needed is people to collect evidence on abuse in this process

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH, As you may have seen I have had dealings with the DCA's for nearly two years and have been told

that in collecting for government depts. they must conform to they codes of practice in place for all debt collection,

anything further has to be handed back to the dept. concerned.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up date my MPs' office has acknowledged my communication on the use of DCA'S for DWP

debt/over payment.

Will post up results.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of very large smelly ones HS:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a reply from my MP with regard to the regulating of DCA's and CRA's employed

by the government to collect benefit over payments etc.

He has referred the matter to Lord Freud,Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Welfare Reform)

He been asked to clarify exactly the manner in which the companies are regulated.

Edited by BRIGADIER2JCS

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...