Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Resigned from job due to illness...will I get benefits??


Big Shoooz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4275 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So is it best to just tell them that it's in their best interest to pay it without further delay as they are breaking the law because they had agreed to pay it on 15th March and see if that provokes a response?

The response I have had today is that it will be paid as soon as the company Payroll has been redone and there is no need for me to contact the managing director over this matter (like I had threatened) because he can't get the payroll done any quicker.

I'm not sure the MD knows what is going on but if he knew he was breaking the law I'm sure he would just sort out my pay straight away and then get the payroll re-run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

sev threads on basically the same subject merged

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are to be made redundant and the employer requires you to work your notice period:

You are entitled to full pay if off sick during this period regardless as to whether your company has a sick pay policy or not,( as long as you have provided a doctors sick note)

But if you go sick for a reason that would have jeopardised you returning to work then your employer could challenge your right to sick pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi, I've been looking through other posts in the hope my question will be answered but I'm still confused so needed to start this thread (sorry!).When an ESA/ATOS medical has been failed, should I just put the minimal amount of information on the GL24 form to state why I disagree with the medical report and DWPs decision?My understanding is that the GL24 is just the initial form to say that you disagree with the decision so that DWP will look into it and hopefully reconsider it and that it's only necessary to pick out every single inconsistency in the medical report if the DWP don't change their decision and so you then need to go to a tribunal. Is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. Yes, I think you've understood it right. At least, if you haven't then I haven't!

 

As you say, you don't need to put much on the GL24, but I only ever filled in the one myself. I hope someone in the know will be along later to suggest how much to say.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. Yes, I think you've understood it right. At least, if you haven't then I haven't!

 

As you say, you don't need to put much on the GL24, but I only ever filled in the one myself. I hope someone in the know will be along later to suggest how much to say.

 

My best, HB

 

Hi HB, thanks for your quick response. Did you not have to go to a tribunal after filling in your GL24 form?Will I be ok to say on the GL24 that I disagree with DWP's decision because there are inconsistencies between my medical questionnaire and the ATOS medical report which means I should have scored more points or do I have to list all the consistencies one by one at this stage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. Yes, I ended up at a tribunal, but had to go through the request for reconsideration [GL24] first.

 

What you're proposing to say sounds reasonable to me, but it would be nice if someone with more experience would comment for you. I've seen leemack and Erika today, so hopefully they'll be around later.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really should submit as much information as possible with the GL24, or write on it that more information will follow if you are running out of time to get your appeal in.

 

Not giving all of this information to DWP means that they are less likely to be able to revise the decision in your favour. They reconsider every case before sending it on to tribunal, but the more information they have in support of your claim, the more likely it is they will revise in your favour, and you won't have to go to tribunal. Not providing enough information often means you'll have to wait months to get an appeal date - thus waiting months for your additional benefit, and it causes uneccessary delays in the tribunal system for others.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also put in the GL24 with minimum information but stating that you will be sending further supportive evidence within x weeks - say 2-4, not more than 4 weeks. Many decision makers will give you some time to present it, though its not a guarantee. With ongoing ESA dependant on having made the appeal, it is difficult for some to wait for evidence from their doctor that may take a few weeks, before needing to put in the GL24. Also at this stage, some don't have the atos report.

 

Getting evidence in early, the less likely you are to have to go to tribunal. It didn't used to be this way for incap or ESA, they were rarely overturned before tribunal, but with the push lately to avoid the excessive Tribunal numbers by the DWP, there is a real chance to get decisions overturned early.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

My partner and I are on a couple claim for ESA. My OH is the claimant. He has failed an ATOS medical, appealed and won his tribunal 6 weeks ago (but still awaiting ANY contact from DWP to confirm he will receive backdated payment).

We have some questions now because at the moment we are in limbo, waiting for DWP to confirm what we should do next:

 

1. Is it normal to wait more than 6 weeks for DWP to confirm they acknowledge the appeal was won and that backdated payment will be given?

 

2. The appeal decision stated that my OH is "entitled to ESA with the work related activity component".....does this mean he is now in the WRAG? If so, what does it involve?

 

3. Does my OH still have to get a fit note from his GP every 4 weeks or can he now be put on repeat prescriptions for his medication and only visit the GP for check up say every 3 months? Also, if fit notes are no longer required, will there come a point when DWP will request them again? Will his GP still issue them after a gap?

 

4. I have also always got a fit note from my GP every 4 weeks although DWP say they do not require them, but I have got them in case my OH failed all the medical/appeal and then I had to become the main claimant. Should I also now stop getting the fit notes and ask to be put on repeat prescriptions for my medication?

 

5. The DWP didn't send their usual reminder letter for a fit note the last time one was due.....can we assume this is because they are aware my OH won his appeal and so no longer needs to send fit notes?

 

6. How long will my OH be in the support group he has been put in?

 

7. What happens about my NI contributions? I understand my OH is covered because he is the claimant but will I not be contributing now and therefore affecting my state pension (if its not already abolished by the time I get to that age!!)? Should I be informing my tax office that I am on an ESA claim?

 

Sorry for so many questions, hope you can answer them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Shooz:

 

1. Yes. Could be two to four months, such is their backlog and reluctance to pay.

 

2. Yes. Unlimited work focused interviews but, for the moment, he can't forced to apply for work.

 

3. No. Once Jobcentreplus have acknowledged the decision, preferably in writing!

 

5. No. Don't assume Jobcentreplus know until you've received a written acknowledgement of the decision. No unfit note may mean no assessment rate till they've caught up.

 

6. No idea. Was the ESA85 in the bundle from Jobcentreplus? Should be a prognosis towards the end of it.

 

4. and 7. Need more detail than should be put on an open forum.

 

Congrats on staying the course and winning at tribunal.:whoo::whoo:

 

Best wishes to both of you, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Big Shooz..I won my tribunal and received notification of the decision on the 8th June..Having waited 6 weeks and receiving NOTHING from the D.W.P. I rang them..They told me it would take seven to ten working days to sort it all out.

 

That came and went with still nothing, so I rang them again. This time, I was informed that because of staff shortage, and a backlog of paperwork, it could be up to another 2 weeks before I receive anything. It has been nearly a year since I failed the W.C.A. and cannot believe how long it is taking to sort out.

 

Just thought i'd share this with you, so you know you're not alone..

 

Sorry I can't help with your other questions, but finally, I was told NOT to stop sending fit-notes in, until the D.W.P., or jobcentre tells you to.

 

All the best..Chelle123

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...