Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Holiday entitlement.


dave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'll kick off with a well known one:

 

Regardless of your employment contract, you are entitled to at least 4 weeks paid holiday in the UK.

 

Not sure if this is instant, or if you would be bound by a probabation period.

 

(Stephen could probably tell us more ;-) )

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would depend on what period the company use for acruing holiday entitlement. If it is from January to December, and you started work on 1st April, then you would only be entitled to three-quarters of the holiday in that year ie 3 weeks.

 

Also remember that if you were to take the three weeks holiday, and then left the company on 31st September, the company would be entitled to reclaim one week of the holiday pay back, as you would only have worked for them for six months.

 

Other factors do come into play with part-time and shift workers etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite right - the holiday entitlement would be pro-rataed.

 

My partners sisters boyfriend, had a job where he was paid for only 3 days holiday regardless of the % of the year he'd been there.

 

He wasn't aware that they legally had to pay him for 4 weeks.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - not as a contractor. Sorry.

 

As an employee of the firm you would be entitled.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

European legislation came in some years ago now. All part-time workers, temps, contractors etc., are entitled to paid holiday just the same as full time employed people.

 

Try this link:

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/life/employment/holidays_and_holiday_pay.htm#who_has_the_right_to_paid_holidays

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey!! You learn something every day.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey!! You learn something every day.

 

I have to admit that these changes crept in from Europe without much publicity. At the time I was working in a Human Resources office, so had to deal with it at the front line, so to speak.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....are you saying I'm entitled to paid holiday as a contractor?

 

As a contractor, you are just there to be bled dry by the inland revenue who want to treat you as an employee (IR35). However, it seems we do not get any of the perks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Am I understanding this correctly..

I work as a job sharer for a large airline company.. I work 10 days a month on a 2on 4off roster I have worked for the same company for nearly 10yrs and i receive 16.5 days off a year is this ok? As we are shift workers we are contracted to work all public holidays,xmas etc

just wondering if i have a good deal or am entitled to any more..

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ran an recruitment agency with loads of temps who all now get holiday pay entitlement. It's a good thing for temps as they often went from one job to another and never took a break and often their rate did not reflect the equivelant of permanent staff. However, contractors as they like to be called with their Limited Companies faired alot better with thier reduced tax & NI and higher charges - I don't feel too sorry for Ltd Company contractors I'm affraid, they in the main do very nicely thank you and shouldn't complain too much on a site like this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a HR Advisor - I thought I'd just say that this 4 weeks does not mean 28 days. It means 4 working weeks. 20 Days. Also it is perfectly legal (although terribly bad practice) for companies to include 8 Bank Holidays a year in this figure. I am so lucky, I get 35 days holiday plus Bank Holidays a year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also remember that if you were to take the three weeks holiday, and then left the company on 31st September, the company would be entitled to reclaim one week of the holiday pay back, as you would only have worked for them for six months.

 

Alanfromderby, i beg to differ here, if you do take 3 weeks paid holiday (but have only accrued say 1 week) the employer cannot reclaim the holiday pay from your final wages as this would be seen as an unlawful deduction from wages, the fact that they have paid you for something you are not entitled to is their problem and they have no legal recourse for getting the money back - if they did unlawfully take this from final wages then you would have a case at an industrial tribunal and you would win, but of course ACAS would tell the employer this before it got to a tribunal and advise them to pay up or else !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also remember that is you are on Statutory Maternity Leave, your holiday entitlement must accrue at the same rate as if you were still working at the place of work. I used to be a temp and got 20 days, 8 of which were bank hols so technically got 12 days holiday a year and kind of accrued them as I went along.

 

They tried to tell me they didn't accrue on Maternity Leave, I gave them the DTi Maternity Rights booklet with the paragrapgh highlighted, it seems they had done it to other people and owed them £100's!

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, does anyone know what I would be entitled to if anything.

I work in an Afterschool club 3pm - 6pm 32 weeks a year (term time) The rest of the time during the holidays my work is unpredictable, One holiday I could work the whole holidays 5 days a week 10hour days. But these hols (easter half term) there is know work for me so therefore no pay either.

I have asked my employer on many occasions what my entitlement is but still after almost 2 years I do not have an answer.

I was paid for 1 weeks holiday last year, and I was given a £200 xmas bonus (which when i asked about holiday pay was told that was covered in the bonus, so was it a bonus or holiday pay?)

I liek my job as it suits my circumstances at the moment but can't help but feel a bit let down.

vicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alanfromderby, i beg to differ here, if you do take 3 weeks paid holiday (but have only accrued say 1 week) the employer cannot reclaim the holiday pay from your final wages as this would be seen as an unlawful deduction from wages, the fact that they have paid you for something you are not entitled to is their problem and they have no legal recourse for getting the money back - if they did unlawfully take this from final wages then you would have a case at an industrial tribunal and you would win, but of course ACAS would tell the employer this before it got to a tribunal and advise them to pay up or else !!

 

 

I agree that this is not as clear-cut as I suggested. However, most companies do have a clause about it within their Contracts of Employment, and where it is stated that unaccrued leave has to be repaid then that is the case.

 

Employees without a CofE, or where their contract does not have such a clause then they cannot be made to repay.

 

This is taken from the ACAS website:

 

What happens when a worker has taken more leave than their entitlement on termination of employment?

Regulation 14 (4) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 states that an employer and worker can draw up a 'relevant agreement'( for example, in the contract of employment) to provide that a worker will compensate the employer, whether by payment, undertaking additional work or otherwise if leave already taken is in excess of entitlement when employment ends.

 

There should be a 'relevant agreement' in place; if not, and a deduction of overpayment is made by the employer from the worker's final wage payment, the worker may have the right to submit a claim to an employment tribunal under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 - the right not to suffer unauthorised deductions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about if you work 5 days one week and 6 days the other alternate weeks.

 

if you are entitled to 4 paid weeks and the employer only gives 20 days paid holiday are they conning workers out a days holiday pay here?.

 

only 1 day i know but rather my days holiday than being at work

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone.

 

Just to pose a question:

I have been on long term sick and and the company have clawed back some money from me.I am in full time employment and I get 30 days per year which is 2.5 per month.

 

They have taken back pro-rata and i was just wondering that as i have a contract with the company which gives me these days per year, am i entitled to the holidays as in payment for these when i am not there or do i have to be at work to `earn` this entitlement.

 

Have been with this company for 5 years and never thought of questioning losing entitlement through sickness.

DPA Letter sent 28 Feb

  • Statements Received 24 Mar
  • Prelim sent 24 Mar
  • LBA sent 12 Apr
  • MCOL 26 Apr
  • Acknowledged 3 May
  • Coming soon:

£2810 inc int. Halifax. Done and Dusted 16/05/06

Dont forget to donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that you are entitled to accrue holiday pay whilst on long-term sickness, provided that it is only part of the year that you are ill. If you are absent for the whole year - then you cannot claim back pay in lieu of holiday entitlement.

 

If in doubt ring ACAS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks alot, that is a good answer. Accrue was the word I was looking for.

 

I was just chancing my arm would have been a bit cheeky to ask for something for nothing.

 

Dont buy a raffle ticket. Dont win a prize.

 

Thanks.

DPA Letter sent 28 Feb

  • Statements Received 24 Mar
  • Prelim sent 24 Mar
  • LBA sent 12 Apr
  • MCOL 26 Apr
  • Acknowledged 3 May
  • Coming soon:

£2810 inc int. Halifax. Done and Dusted 16/05/06

Dont forget to donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can someone please advise me,

 

I started working for a company on 1 February and our holiday period started 1 April. My contract states that 'You are entitled to 1 and half days holiday per calander month'. I know from asking around that we can carry holidays forward, but only a maximum of 5 days.

 

Does anyone know of a time limit to carrying them forward? Contract has no information on time.

 

eg, I took no holidays until April, so would I still be entitled to carry forward the 3 days I was entitled to from Feb - March?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please advise me,

 

I started working for a company on 1 February and our holiday period started 1 April. My contract states that 'You are entitled to 1 and half days holiday per calander month'. I know from asking around that we can carry holidays forward, but only a maximum of 5 days.

 

Does anyone know of a time limit to carrying them forward? Contract has no information on time.

 

eg, I took no holidays until April, so would I still be entitled to carry forward the 3 days I was entitled to from Feb - March?

 

Hi Tucool,

 

Going by what you say, then yes you would be entitled to carry them forward, but when you have to use them by is entirely up to your company. My OHs holiday year is Jan to Dec, and can carry forward 5 days, but these have to be used by the end of March, else he loses them. Where as I work for a company that don't allow any hols ot be carried forward at all.

 

It should all be in your contract, but if in any doubt, speak to your line manager or HR.

 

Suzie x

The world is divided into 10 types of people - those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...