Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capone/cabot v OH (disputed Acc)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

*** HELP ***

 

Although I have disputed the account based on charges, I have received(yet again) a reply from capquest stating that they have been instructed by capone to carry on with collection activities, capone will deal with the dispute (they have only offered a £12 refund :eek: ), surely capquest arent allowed to pursue a disputed account.

 

Capq are only collecting on behalf of capone - the account has not been assigned.

 

Currently dealing with three bereavements within eight days and can well do without these leeces at the moment. :(

 

Any advice would be most welcome.

 

just file em and ignore em until your ready to deal with them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 455
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Beachy and sorry to hear what you're going through just now.

 

As DD says, ignore until you have time to deal with them - they're not worth worrying about. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Beachy

sorry to hear what you going through,Maybe DD right as you have made it clear enough in several letters to Crap one and Capquest that account in dispute and that you strongly believe they dont have an enforceable cca and some people on my thread think they have shreedded most of them from the earlier sort of times we took our cards out.Capquest know this Crapital one know this and you know this! They woud be stupid to try and escalate it .i think i saw on Zazen wariers thread that she saw hl legal and capquest off with some letters she used on her thread! Maybe if you look at her tactics and letters ,if you still anxious to send them something but you have made it clear to them now you kow your rights which is the important thing.

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing to add beachy, but just wanted to say how sorry I am you're having to deal with so much in such a short time.

 

I hope things pick up for you soon.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry to hear about your bereavements, Beachy.

 

Was good to hear you have shucked CapQuest though. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news Beachy! I glad you saw them off ok :D

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you one & all.

 

We are quite touched by the messages on this wonderful forum, we consider you all as our 'special friends' who we will probably never meet, although we hope that one day we will have that opportunity.

 

As for CQ, it was certainly a tonic to get them off my back, I'm sure it wont be long before the next one swims to the surface for a bite - still now that C1 have put it in writing that there IS a dispute it should be easier for me.

 

As they say Onwards & Upwards :)

 

Have a good weekend.

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a good w/e too Beachy.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HELP - WILL THESE EVER GET OFF MY BACK

 

Need some more help here please guys, has Ellie Left ? Patrica Chadwick now writing.

 

'Thank you for writing to CQ advising them that your account is in dispute because you do not agree with the documentation you received from us. I am disappointed you feel these documents are incorrect.

 

I have sent a copy of this letter to CQ to advise them we have sent you a copy of the alledged agreement contained within s78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. Therefore we believe the documentation sent to you to be correct and for that reason we do not consider this account to be in dispute.

 

As a result, we have instructed CQ to continue further collection of your account on our behalf.

 

Please be aware, we will continue to pursue the outstanding debt and as we do not consider this account to be in dispute, I would remind you that you are bound by the terms & conditions of your credit agreement and are obliged to maintain payments and repay your outstanding balance.

 

Please contact CQ to arrange payment of the outstanding balance.

 

Your letter to CQ mentioned we may be in violation of various acts, guidelines and regulations.

 

Please be aware that our agreements are drafted by legal professionals and are monitored to ensure compliance with current regulations and the commercial enviroment. We are therefore confident that the terms of our agreements are fair and enforceable and will strongly defend any claim making allegations to the contrary.

 

I trust I have explained things clearly, however, if you have any more questions about this, please write back to me within four weeks. My address details are in the leaflet I have included, which also outlines our complaints procedure. If I do not hear from you again within the four weeks, I will consider that you are happy with my response and that your complaint is closed'.

 

 

NO MENTION OF UNFAIR CHARGES THAT THEY WONT REFUND

 

Beachy

Edited by beachcomber60
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

HELP - WILL THESE EVER GET OFF MY BACK

 

Need some more help here please guys, has Ellie Left ? Patrica Chadwick now writing.

 

'Thank you for writing to CQ advising them that your account is in dispute because you do not agree with the documentation you received from us. I am disappointed you feel these documents are incorrect.

 

I have sent a copy of this letter to CQ to advise them we have sent you a copy of the alledged agreement contained within s78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. Therefore we believe the documentation sent to you to be correct and for that reason we do not consider this account to be in dispute.

 

As a result, we have instructed CQ to continue further collection of your account on our behalf.

 

Please be aware, we will continue to pursue the outstanding debt and as we do not consider this account to be in dispute, I would remind you that you are bound by the terms & conditions of your credit agreement and are obliged to maintain payments and repay your outstanding balance.

 

Please contact CQ to arrange payment of the outstanding balance.

 

Your letter to CQ mentioned we may be in violation of various acts, guidelines and regulations.

 

Please be aware that our agreements are drafted by legal professionals and are monitored to ensure compliance with current regulations and the commercial enviroment. We are therefore confident that the terms of our agreements are fair and enforceable and will strongly defend any claim making allegations to the contrary.

 

I trust I have explained things clearly, however, if you have any more questions about this, please write back to me within four weeks. My address details are in the leaflet I have included, which also outlines our complaints procedure. If I do not hear from you again within the four weeks, I will consider that you are happy with my response and that your complaint is closed'.

 

 

NO MENTION OF UNFAIR CHARGES THAT THEY WONT REFUND

 

Beachy

 

You could ask to visit their offices and inspect the alleged agreement... their procedures as confirmed to me in their defence is to scan the front page only.

 

Until they show you a document with the prescribed terms signed by yourself and them then its unenforceable.

 

and in any event... they state their agreements are compliant with current legislation.. well thats not hard now with s127(3) repealed the bag of a fag packet could count as an agreement(extreme I know).

 

S.

Edited by the_shadow
Link to post
Share on other sites

I offered that diddydicky and they stated that they had no facilities to entertain guests to inspect their agreements, oh what surprise, another excuse to not show us.

kb

Keefy (:-)The "Moaner":rolleyes:)Boy

Prepared to take on anyone until I win...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D You guys have certainly lifted my spirits on what has been an absolute sh*t day.

 

I wanted to go to Nottingham to view the original as its the only way to resolve this dispute, should I point out to them that the alledged agreement doesn't fall under 'current' legislation and that as I have already been terminated surely I dont have an agreement to abide by?

 

Room for three if I can get an appointment :)

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noffing at all, I would think the board room would have been good enough for us, don't you, wiv real china cups (wots one of them? ) and saucers.

Keefy (:-)The "Moaner":rolleyes:)Boy

Prepared to take on anyone until I win...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that now C1 have sent me my sar, (I am still trying to wade through it all) and I've stopped paying as my account is definately still indispute, they will try a CQ on me soon... corr I'm saving a whole £3 a month by not paying them, how many months before I can buy a round down the pub anyone any ideas please?

Keefy (:-)The "Moaner":rolleyes:)Boy

Prepared to take on anyone until I win...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote= Should I point out to them that the alledged agreement doesn't fall under 'current' legislation and that as I have already been terminated surely I dont have an agreement to abide by?

 

Beachy

 

Any thoughts on the above

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to joinn you all too! :D

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...