Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  So brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details so first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it ,this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025 so slightly longer than the original tax set up so all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. So I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled so I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
    • Do you also own land the garages on and the private road? Or is it shared freehold with right of access to all freeholders or why?  Dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

allied international


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4693 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Huff&Puff that is so defeatest!:p!

 

There is stacks you can do to stop them ringing, it just takes the right tool for the job that's all....

 

Administration of Justice Act 1970 (c.31)

 

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c. 40)

 

Now, any breach of both the above Acts is a criminal offence, the Admin of Justice Act makes it a criminal offence for a creditor or their Agent (DCA) to make demands for money which are aimed at causing 'alarm, distress or humiliation, because of their frequency, publicity or manner'.

 

And the second act makes it even clearer, that 'any person who pursues a course of action which they know 'or ought to know' amounts to harassment of another person could be classed as having committed a criminal offence under the act.

 

So a complaint to the DCA in question swiftly followed up with a complaint to Trading Standards Institute - Home page

And the The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Great advice from Bazooka Boo. Send your letters, and if they still keep ringing you can just say you've written to them, and you'll only accept communication in writing, or just refuse to go through security, or just hang up.

 

I actually did start talking to them though after joining CAG, and what's been surprising is that after I have told the first DCA on each account what the situation actually is - no proper agreement, CCA 1974, regulations state... etc., when the original creditor takes it back and passes it to a second (or third) one, I never hear from these unless it is in writing.

 

Clearly the credit card companies don't tell them the account is in dispute and why when they sell it on, which is making me wonder if the DCAs all share some kind of database which says it's not worth bothering with phone calls to DD because she'll just quote the CCA 1974 at you.

 

That seems incredibly far-fetched but I was being hounded every single day but loads of them, and I haven't heard from any of them for months - not even the new ones call now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all, an update. I sent the CCA letter to Fredricksons and have received a credit agreement paper from Nat West now. They were 2 days over the 12 working days and apologised for the delay! wow!! Thing is, the credit agreement does not have my signature on it anywhere, just my name and address. Am wondering if it is the right thing and would like to know what to do now? Please help. I tried to scan it to put it on here but am useless with computers.Basically it says the amount of loan, insurance cost, total charge for credit and total amount payable, annual percentage rate. There is a place at the bottom of the page that says customer signature but no signature on it by me or anyone from the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a bit of a rush so can't find the exact link I am looking for, but, just because they have replied with the agreement minus your signature, does not mean it is unenforceable, they are allowed to remove signatures from the agreement, there is a template on here somewhere which says why you shouldnt use s78 request if you want to receive the agrerement with your sigs on.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, after trying everything i could to get the letter on here have given up and done the only other thing i could think of!1 typed it out myself and pasted it! Long winded but hopefully worked. Everything is word for word although the layout might be a bit suss, sorry!! I noticed there was no date on the agreement, don't know if that is relevant, and no signatures either. So, here goes...

 

 

Date 14 December 2009 Nat West Bank Plc

Etc

 

 

 

 

Our ref: *****

 

 

Your ref:

 

 

 

 

Dear Miss ***

 

 

Re: Request for copy of Credit Agreement under Section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

Account: *****

 

 

We write with reference to your recent correspondence, dated 21 November 2009 and apologise for the delay in our response.

 

 

Please find enclosed a copy of the Credit Agreement, Insurance Certificate and a schedule of Arrears as requested.

 

 

We trust this is satisfactory; should you have any further queries please contact this office at the above address

 

 

ours sincerely

 

 

scribble scribble

 

 

Recovery Manager

 

 

And....

 

 

Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

 

Please sign below where indicated

    Parties to Agreement
     
    The Bank Nat West Bank
    The Customer Me
     
     
    2. Purpose and Amount of Credit
     
    (a)£4,500 cash loan for Refinance Debt this Bank Main Loan (a) + (b)

(b)£ for repayment to the Bank of account number £4,500

 

( c ) £1,275 being the premium payable to the insurers for optional Loan Protector insurance in relation to this Agreement against the death sickness accident and unemployment of Me (the insured ) in accordance with the Banks Loan Protector Insurance leaflet.

 

 

3. The Credit £5,775

    (2(a)+2(b)+2© )

 

    4. The total charge for credit £2,208.60 Comprising (a) Interest £2,208.60 (b) Administration Fee £0

 

    5. The total amount payable ££7,983.60
    (3+4)
     

    6. The Instalment Repayments

Repayments due one month after the Credit is drawn and monthly thereafter as follows:-

60 Repayments of £133.06 Comprising Main Loan repayments

Insurance Loan Repayments £29.38

 

7.Annual Percentage Rate (APR) 14.4%

 

 

8. Charges on Default (a) The Banks Expenses in enforcing this Agreement. These expenses will include (but not be limited to) expense of taking steps including court action , to obtain payment , tracing the customer if the customer changes address without notice and communicating with the customer if the customer breaks the terms of this agreement and (b) Interest (APR) on any sum payable to the bank under this agreement from its due date to the date of actual payment

 

    9. Service Account
    (Account from which Instalment Repayments will be made) Sort Code ***

Account Number ***

 

 

    10. Destination Account

(Account to which any cash loan is to be paid) Sort Code ***

Account Number ***

 

 

By signing this Agreement the Customer confirms:-

  1. having read this agreement including the terms and conditions set out seperately
  2. having received a copy of this agreement
  3. having elected to take the option of death, accident sickness and unemployment insurance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See page 2 of this Agreement for the remaining terms and conditions related to the Credit

 

 

 

WOW IT WORKED, Phew..... Please let me know what you think. Thanks foe all the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a multi agreement so there should be separate signature boxes for the loan and PPI - they are different types of credit and must have separate agreements and prescribed terms. The loan is debtor-creditor and the PPI is debtor - creditor - supplier, the supplier being whoever provided the insurance. Did they send you statements?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There doesn't appear to be seperate signature boxes. There was a bit on the terems and conditions page that just said customer initials. I never had any statements from the insurance company as far as i'm aware, in fact, until i got a load of paperwork from nat west, i did not realise that i had insurance. It does not seem that there are seperate agreements here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all, hope you've all had good xmas and new year. Would be grateful for any advice on what to do now. Have started to get calls from Fredricksons again, not answered then just checked the number but don't really know where i stand now. Is it worth still trying to dispute the case or should i make an offer of payment? Hope someone can help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Hippy - you seem to have been deserted!:-) As I said above, this is a multiple agreement and the PPI should have been shown separately. Do you think you were badly advised about the PPI anyway? Were you aware it was there? I would argue with Frederickson that this is an unlawful agreement as there should have been 2 separate agreements, one for the alleged loan and one for the alleged PPI. The document they have sent is not a properly executed agreement and until such times as you receive one the alleged agreement is in dispute and you will be making no payment whilst the dispute remains. Send you letter to Frederickson's Complaints Department. Tell them you want everything in writing and they must cease all calls immediately as they have no legitimate right to pursue the alleged debt whilst it is in dispute. Failure to do so will result in a complaint to the OFT's Credit Licence Fitness department. Frederickson's don't like any hassle and will probably sell it on. If they do, you are half way there because it will just get passed round the houses until one of them finally gives up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for your help. Am writing to fredricksons and will say what you said about it being an illegal agreemant. I did not even realise that i had the PPI until nat west sent me that bunch of papers!! So definately think it could be classed as misold. Thanks for your help, will update when i get reply (or if!!) Bye for now and thanks again.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I have been scarred for life, a 'friend' told me to watch (Removed for not only my sake, but to protect others also!), I'll never be able to close my eyes again!

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just about to start cooking dinner ... that is seriously gross.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please, I am trying to eradicate it from my Memory! I had to sleep on my back last night,

the next time I see my so called 'mate' I'm just gonne kick him square in the crown jewels....

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back to matters in hand, I was thinking that Unlawful and Illegal kind of mean the same thing, so would Unfair be better terminology to use?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...