Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dubious and unusual situation!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5423 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Unusual situation here...... a lady came to me for help with an alleged debt. As it's statute barred I have simply advised her to send the statute barred template and contact OFT. I've also advised her to join CAG; she currently has no internet access so I asked if she'd be ok for me to post this thread in the meantime. Her experience got me thinking how this would pan out if it hadn't been statute barred.....

 

She applied for a loan 9 years ago for household improvements. She was accepted and signed for the loan. The day that she did this, her parents offered to lend her the money with no interest. She rang the loan company, and explained she no longer needed the loan. They put a hold on the funds being released to her but advised they needed her to cancel th loan in writing. She did so, and received a letter back acknowledging her letter and stating that the loan had been cancelled. She thought no more about it until approximately 1 year ago when she started to get letters from a DCA demanding repayment.

 

Correspondance went back and forth for a time, with this lady explaining that although she had applied for the loan and was accepted she had cancelled it and never received the funds. She explained that she had at the time receievd a letter from the company to confirm the loan was cancelled. However she made the error of admitting that she no longer had this correspondence. She asked for proof that she had received the money.

 

She received a copy of the CCA - and again insisted that although she accepted the loan she later cancelled it and did not receive the funds. The DCA told her on the phone (yes she made the mistake of ringing them too!) that all they needed to do was produce the CCA in court and she'd have to "pay up then, including court costs".

 

As it's statute barred, CCA or not they can't enforce this but I am pondering if it wasn't statute barred, how she could fight that - they have the CCA yes but she claims to have never received the funds as the loan was cancelled.

 

Any thoughts on this? I didn't think loans got cancelled - I had thought once the CCA was signed that would be it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the creditor that has to prove the debt exists. I'd ask them to prove that the money was received, and they'll have a hard time doing so as they didn't release any funds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, they might have a CCA but what about statements and repayments?

Edited by bigandyuk1
I must learn to speell

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks folks. She's not happy to let it lie at the statute barring. She called me again today. She wants to take them to court for harassment (now she knows they hold so little power!)

 

I have advised her she should seek proper legal advise if her wish is to take that route. I bloody well hope she nails them. To be honest I was slightly doubting her story to begin with - I was frank about this to her - it's not my place to judge but it's something I have never come across before - it just seemed strange that this all creeped up on her at the "right time". Like banks only keeping records for seven years - the records for that period will likely be destroyed, ect. She also wouldn't name the OC or the DCA either. I'm a strong advocate that where a DCA has failed, get them nailed but I needed her to be completely honest or I might have given her the wrong advice. She did appear genuine it's just very strange!! (What's not strange about a DCA though, eh!)

 

She's hell bent on making them pay for harassing her and is determined to go further than a report to the OFT!!

 

I hope they do an audit trail that far back, or find something that a solicitor can and will use in a claim against them.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Even tho' this was an a/c from 9 years ago they should still have all the data which would include the transfer of any monies. They are required under the Data Protection Act & the Money Laundering Act to keep this information for a period of five years after the a/c is closed so a sar should throw up the info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to know how it pans out, I hope she gets back in touch. If she does I will ask again if I can post the result.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing:wink:

 

Actually, no, I'm gonna throw my two penna worth in aswell:D

 

I understand the situation, but having thought about it a little, something is definitely fishy here, and quite possibly fraudulent :eek:

 

So a DCA is chasing her and saying that she owes money on a Loan that was never taken, so that would imply that the Bank sold a ficticious debt onto a DCA, thereby, the Bank would have received money from the sale of the debt aswell as money from their insurance!

 

I would think that needs alot further investigation by the FOS aswell as the OFT, plus a complaint to the bank in question and having them conduct an internal fraud investigation, it is definitley suspect8)

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooooh this is GRIPPING stuff!! I sooo hope she comes back and lets me know the outcome

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It says in the small print that you have 14 days cooling off period with all loans, so having the CCA isnt going to prove anything.

 

Good luck to her.

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...