Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OFT imposes requirements on Mackenzie Hall to improve handling of disputed debts


fermi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

removed some off topic remarks and libellous remarks.

 

Maybe MH should do the same with what they have printed on their webs*ite

 

 

Our business and solid reputation is built around our core values of professionalism, integrity, performance and excellence in service delivery. In addition, all of our services are delivered to ISO 9001:2000 quality standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mmmmmmmm i see that the directors addresses appear as public information therefore what is to prevent someone who keeps being pestered outside of the OFT guidlines from visiting the directors at THEIR home address to deliver the letters asking them not to harrass!

 

accompanied by a reporter from a national newspaper!

Link to post
Share on other sites

mmmmmmmm i see that the directors addresses appear as public information therefore what is to prevent someone who keeps being pestered outside of the OFT guidlines from visiting the directors at THEIR home address to deliver the letters asking them not to harrass!

 

accompanied by a reporter from a national newspaper!

 

If you were so minded it's far easier and safer (legal wise) just to repeatedly send them a nice postcard saying you will visit on xx date between x and x time first :-)

Edited by the_shadow
DOH Fat fingers!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Our business and solid reputation is built around our core values of professionalism, integrity, performance and excellence in service delivery. In addition, all of our services are delivered to ISO 9001:2000 quality standards.

 

Which means that they have have a big FO manual saying lots of nice things which nobody reads and has an inch of dust on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which means that they have have a big FO manual saying lots of nice things which nobody reads and has an inch of dust on it.

 

That's a bit like:

 

  • "Education, education, education"
  • "We won't raise income tax"
  • "We will give you a referendum on the EU constitution"

One of the great lies.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a bit like:

 

  • "Education, education, education"
  • "We won't raise income tax"
  • "We will give you a referendum on the EU constitution"

One of the great lies.

 

Fred

 

Whoops, quoted the wrong thread - should have been the one above that.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cor! I bet Tony is laughing his socks off.

 

He knew the wheels were going to come off and legged it leaving poor dumb Gordon to carry the can. Prime Minister..... talk about being out of your depth!!!

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a bit like:

 

  • "Education, education, education"
  • "We won't raise income tax"
  • "We will give you a referendum on the EU constitution"

One of the great lies.

 

Fred

 

 

Only one more like a million & one:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

The transcript of Andrew Mackinleys motion House of Commons Hansard Debates for 22 Apr 2009 (pt 0019)

 

I have edited Andrew Macinlay’s external links on Wikipedia to highlight his debt collection debate in the House on 22 April 2009.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_MacKinlay

“External links

 

Regards – Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent piece. Glad to see he referred to Mackenzie Hall as ''That Outfit''

 

I am also glad to see he mention our good buddies in HFO as well. Of course thay all come up with the usual glib bullsh!t denials that they or their monkeys do anything wrong and that they are all good members of the CSA etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My god, I loved reading that.

 

When Mr Leech got his chance I thought he was going to say something to the contrary, but he just made a further observation about in-house Sols, and then came the 'yes, they are rotten to the core'. It was much better than a sneeze for me! :D

 

Does anyone have any idea who these 9 are that the OFT are still hacked off with? (I still think they should be doing alot more, although they appear to be doing more than I thought, though we know it's at best, limp).

 

Who is this DCA that is supposedly stopping pursuing debts that are in dispute?

 

What was all that about the CSA being helpful, though? (cynic me?) :rolleyes:

 

That was brilliant, but still could have been hammered home harder... a few more 'ffs - boy are these animals at it, every second of every day...causing bedlam, concern and grief through threats and intimidation and with no f**king regard to our laws whatsoever' would have made me even more chuffed. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

there was a phone call to my office just two hours before I commenced this Adjournment debate, asking for more information. That gives an idea of the sort of cavaliers and cowboys that we are dealing with, among both the companies themselves and their agents. Such behaviour has got to stop.

 

That was regarding Lowell.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent this to the OFT about JD Debt Recovery

 

Reply from the OFT.

 

Dear Mr Alphageek

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act)

Complaint Against: JB Ventures Limited t/a JB Debt Recovery

Licence No: 596203

 

Thank you for your email received on 22 April 2009.

 

We can confirm that the business you mention holds a consumer credit licence. Under the Consumer Credit Act, holders of consumer credit licences must be fit and competent to do so and the OFT has a duty to monitor the fitness and conduct of all traders who hold such a licence.

 

As you are aware, the OFT has issued guidance to consumer credit licence holders engaged in the debt collection industry. The guidance is intended to ensure that debt collectors treat individuals fairly. Non-compliance with this guidance will call into question the fitness of licence holders and applicants. You can view our guidance at: http://www.oft.gov.uk/advice_and_resources/resource_base/legal/cca/debt-collection

 

We have therefore noted the details of your complaint, and we will consider this alongside any other complaints we have received with a view to any consumer credit licensing or other action we may decide to take. If we do take any action against this trader, it is likely that we would need to disclose your identity to this trader along with details of your complaint. I should therefore be grateful if you could sign the enclosed consent form and return it to me. Unfortunately, we cannot disclose any details about any action we may take, due to legal restrictions on the OFT relating to disclosure of information.

 

Thank you again for writing to us and bringing this matter to our attention.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Person

Enquiries and Reporting Centre

Office of Fair Trading

 

JB's website is still the same.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
it would be interesting to know if this lot Mackenzie Hall has improved its practises?

 

I think the answer is very likely in the negative, if you read some of the threads on the forums!!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...