Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
    • Yeah only £10 so may as well just get it done. When it comes to liaising with the police and bargaining before it hopefully goes to court. How does that happen? Via email? Phone call etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing Benefit Reduced cos I get DLA


jendoc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can someone please clarify: I have recently been awarded high rate DLA but I had a letter today saying that my Housing Benefit is to be reduced because i now get DLA.

 

Is this correct.?....I always thougt DLA was not counted as income for housing Benefit purposes?

 

Jendoc

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware it is never possible for DLA to reduce housing benefit.

 

Any chance you could post the full letter?

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if you're in the same position as me.

I get income support as well as DLA and my housing benefit hasn't been reduced.

I would query their decision because DLA is not counted as income.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

The council are definitely wrong to reduce housing benefit on the basis of DLA. DLA is as said above NOT included in anmy calculation for incopme at all. The person who made this decision is wrong. Appeal immediately outlining that reducing housing benefit on the basis of DLA income is unlwful and completely incorrect.

 

You will eventually get it backdated and corrected, but don't expect any apologies.

 

You must appeal within 28 days IIRC.

 

 

Oh.... just re-read. It is a very old thread. No point appealing now. Hopefully that was done at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I receive DLA for my 15 year old son. The council use this as income to calculate my Housing and Council Tax benefit. I did ask why when I called them but did not get an explanation. I will look into it further.:confused:

 

Sorry, but I have to ask. . . are you sure you are not confusing Disability Living Allowance (DLA) with Carers Allowance?

 

DLA is definately disregarded, but if you are receiving Carers Allowance because you care for someone, this is not disregarded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carers Allowance is counted in full as unearned income, obviously unless a claimant is only awarded an underlying entitlement to it. Just checked my guidance, unless things have changed very recently???????? Hey no need to shout either!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if someone is already on IS , and their partner gets Carers allowance for them , part of CS will be deducted as the claimant is receiving IS, however there is a personal allowance which is about £29 ( might be a bit more now ) and non of that can be regarded as INCOME in respect of HOUSING BENIFIT

 

what needs to be clarified here what other BENIFITS the OP is receiving

 

its not a blanket answer that Carers Allowance CANNOT be disregarded in respect of HOUSING BENIFIT

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wondering where Millie says she was on IS? if she was then there would obviously not be an issue with the Council including whatever income they have included. IS would automatically passport max HB and CTB regardless of what other benefits are in payment, deductions only 'normally' occur if there is a non dep residing in the property and the claimant is NOT receiving DLA care component.

The max CA is not payable if there is another DWP benefit in payment which is more, then they have an underlying entitlement to it. Which helps with premiums etc.

 

I queried with MILLIE, to be sure what benefit she was getting in order to ascertain a reason as to why the HB had reduced. I dont think it can be DLA as DLA is disregarded, which is why I think perhaps she is getting Carers ALlowance, which is as I said before included as unearned income even if its at a reduced amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Sorry to start an argument :(

It is DLA I receive for my son. It is in his name but as he is a child it goes into my account.

I don't receive IS. I am in low paid employment and so receive working tax credits. I know they count that as income, but are also counted the DLA as income too.

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Millie

No the Council shouldn't be including your sons DLA as your income, it should be ingnored. In fact, it maybe that him being in receipt of DLA could even increase your applicable amount, because you may be entitled to the disabled child premium and you MAY get more benefit. The best thing to do is write to the benefits section at your local authority and request they reconsider their decsion to include your sons DLA as income. They should then realise thier error and give you back the benefit that's due to you.

Regards Soleman. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...