Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


209 Excellent

1 Follower

  1. What type of tenancy do you have? Is it one where you are all joint tenants on the same agreement? If it is these usually state that tenants are jointly and severally liable for the rent. Which means that if one or more of the joint tenants do not pay, the landlord can chase the other tenants for the money. The other tenants would then be expected to chase/take legal action against the non-paying tenants to recover the money. If all the tenants are jointly and severally liable I don't think it would be found that the landlord did wrong by informing the others of the arrears and that they will be expected to pay if you don't as that is what it states in the tenancy agreement. However, if you all have your own agreements then whether or not you have paid your rent is nothing to do with the others and I think that it would be seen as a data protection breach.
  2. It's the latter. The former wouldn't work as every meter would have to be recalibrated everytime there was a change in the price so that the cost could be worked correctly. Utility bills usually have the balance amount carried over from last period (either credit, debt or nil balance), the amount you have been charged for the current period and any payments received. They also should show how the amount you have been charged has been arrived at - amount of units used at what cost.
  3. I have rarely seen deposit or first month in advance mentioned in advertisements. It's standard to pay these. I've never rented privately without having to pay these at the time of signing the agreement/getting the keys. Anyone looking to rent privately not wanting to pay these or who does not have the money to will find it hard to find a landlord who will let to them.
  4. You need to find out what your Council's allocations/lettings policy says. This will tell you what type of issues would make someone a priority, etc. What actions has your friend taken to find someone to live other than applying for social housing? She may not ever get an offer of a social housing property. I'm in North London and my Council have worked out that about 90% of the people on their housing register will never be offered permanent social housing due to the shortage of properties and the number of people that apply every year.
  5. They know they are in the wrong so are trying to scare you. You were simply stating the fact that if they don't remedy the situation you will have to take further steps. If you haven't done so already you should get some legal advice about whether you can make a claim against the landlord for compensation. But if I were you I would look for somewhere else. The agent and the landlord have shown they don't care about the property or carrying out their obligations. I think you will continue to have problems with them.
  6. I was on JSA for a few months over 10 years ago and my first 3 days were not paid then. So it's not a new thing.
  7. Why do you not want the works done? The Council has a duty to maintain/repair their properties so if this work is needed I don't think they will be able to just accept that you don't want the work done. I know the ALMO/Council I work for has had to take legal action in the past against a few tenants who have refused to have works done/not allowed entry to workmen. Most, if not all, Councils will have a clause in their tenancy agreement and leases that states something about the tenant/leaseholder must allow repair works to be carried out, etc.
  8. Properties should be assessed against the decent homes standard. If they fail to meet the standard then work should be carried out to bring the property up to at least the required standard. If the property meets the standard there is no obligation to carry out any works. The Government has changed the funding recently though so I think a lot of organisations will be finding it hard to do all the work required or to keep to their current programming. For instance the ALMO I work for had been promised all the money we needed and the program was due to be completed by the end of 12/13. However, because of the changes made we had to reapply for funding. We have now not been given the full amount we need, the amount that has been given is now stretched over 4 years (I think) so we can't complete the work in the next 2 years as was planned and only the funding for the 1st 2 years is guaranteed at the moment.
  9. Is it that the Council got an outright possession order and now have a warrant to evict and an eviciton date? Or was a postponed/suspended posession order made (usually made on terms of tenant has to pay current rent plus x off the arrears every week) and then a warrant obtained, etc? If it was the latter then what terms were made and have you stuck to them? If the problem was that it took a long time for your benefits to be paid why do you still owe nearly 3 months worth of rent? Why did HB not cover this amount? You will need to apply to the Court for the warrant to be suspended.
  10. We need more information: Does your partner work? What is their income? It is likely that you would get a sanction for voluntarily leaving work if you applied for JSA. The sanctions can be up to 26 weeks I think.
  11. Nope, unfortunately the only option is to pay and try to get the money back. You could take them to Court but it still won't guarantee that they will actually pay you the money.
  12. You should write to the Council's Insurance Team detailing this incident, the damage to the car and the history of the situation.
  13. "If this is the case are they treated with the same severity??? e.g false claim from the beginning vs change in circumstance." - The are many factors that will affect how lenient Councils and the DWP will be. 1. Believing/having evidence that the person deliberately committed fraud against believing/having evidence that it was a mistake or misunderstanding of the system that led to the person receiving money they were not entitled to. 2. Whether the overpayment/fraud has been going on for a long time especially if they had had a chance to put it right i.e. someone who has consistently handed in the wrong info/omitted info that would affect their claim. 3. If the amount of money that it involves is relatively low i.e. someone who hadn't informed them of a small income increase that would have led to them getting say £5 less per week would likely be treated more leniently than someone who hadn't informed them their partner who earns £30,000 per year had moved in. 4. People who are honest in the interviews and hold their hands up to any mistakes, misunderstandings or even fraud committed will likely be treated more leniently than those who start or continue to lie and are found out. "Is there also a guideline which the investigation team uses to decide the punishments???" - I'm sure there are guidelines but I don't have a copy nor have I seen one. "I know this is unlikely but if any overpayments were made would how the money was spent be taken into account e.g on needed household items??" - Don't think they would take this into account. Remember the DWP and Councils have a duty to investigate reports of fraud and some of these reports are made maliciously or because someone has put 2 and 2 together to make 5.
  14. Paying £13,000 off in March - the DWP will want to see bank statements for the last few months so if your husband applies for JSA in April they will be able to see that you had savings over £16,000 but that the majority was removed shortly before he was made redundant. It is likely that they will see this as deprivation of capital. £13,00 counts as capital and not savings - capital is taken into account as well as savings. So if a claimant owns a house they rent out, etc this would be counted towards whether or not they were over the threshold for means tested benefits. However, if you own a house and live in it this will not be counted as capital as you would not be expected to sell your home to provide money to live on. Savings/capital thresholds for means tested benefits are: under £6,000 - could get full benefit (depending on income) between £6,000 and £16,000 - could still get benefits but they will be reduced over £16,000 - not entitled to any means tested benefits Applying for contributuion based now to avoid future problems - even though savings and income do not affect cont based JSA the DWP usually do ask for the information. This is because the form is for both cont based and income based JSA and they like to have the info so that if they find the person is not eligible for cont based they can then assess them for income based without the delay of getting the relevant documentation. However, unless there is only a short period between claims and it is treated as a rapid reclaim then I don't think they would look at your last claim and what information was given then.
  15. Certainly worth applying to your local Council for Council Tax Benefit. They will then assess you on your household incoem and savings.
  • Create New...