Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


JimmySpangle last won the day on December 9 2009

JimmySpangle had the most liked content!


155 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 'will be visiting you'. Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh scary! And how eaxctly are they going to get onto your property without an appointment then? Usual BS nonsense from a bunch of deadbeats who pray on the vulnerable and easily worried. Don't waste another second thinking about it. Contact BT and have the number reported for harrassment.
  2. I hope you did NOT ask for 8% interest per DAY, otherwise the delay may be due to them being unable to hold then pen still long enough from laughing to write a cheque.
  3. And as above, no matter how tempted sshe may be, IGNORE all threatograms.
  4. Because it is HIS door, not yours! You didn't damage it so why should you pay? When they catch the burglars he can sue them for the rest. until then, he can pay you. When HIS door was damaged by burglars, they broke into his property. it may well be your home, but it is HIS property and the external doors are his responsibility. He may well have been able to get it repaired cheaper, but he didn't answer your calls and you cannot leave your home unsecured. In reality you have done hime a favour by getting it repaired, but it is a repair to his property. You need to let him know politely but firmly that you have taken advise and youi regret that he will have to reimurse you. If he still refuses then you will have to send him a letter before action formerly demanding the money owed within 7 days or you will issue proceedings through county court. I have every confidence he will pay youi with a push.
  5. Normally I agree with what you are saying MrShed, but on this one I see it differently. The OP had the property broken into via the door. That is the landlords area as it is structural as in an access to the property. Teh OP tried in vain to contact the LL for urgent repair for security and could not contact them. The fact that they made the effort to get approval first is enough IMHO to demand a full reimbursement for the lock repair. If necssary, through the courts who I am sure would favour the tenant.
  6. And who exactly is that aimed at? If you want the bottom line, Paypal are doing what you agreed they could do. I hate paypal with a passion and would never use them under any circumstanecs and cirtainly do not work for or support them in any way. But your argument must be based on facts. the fact is you signed up and thus agreed that they can do this. No point throwing toys out the pram if you don't like the truth.
  7. You keep going on and on and on about these 'fake' goods. You do NOT know they are fake, you just assume they are. I have been on pain killers dor 9 years. I have had many different brands of them and on occasions have had no apparent effect from some and a monster effect from others, supposedly the same make! Until they are tested or confirmed by the manufacturer you canot go any further. It won't change hings if you say 'fake' a million times. If the manufacturer says 'real' once, that is sufficient to stop your crusade in its tracks.
  8. I am a little worried about the 'I had no idea what they are for' quote. Without meaning to sound rude, have you taken a UK driving test? have you seen or read the highway code? I genuinely hope your knowledge of red lights, pedestrians, give way lines and stop lines is better.
  9. Because under scetion 143a (b) paragraph IV subsection 243a clause 2 they can 'do what they fecking well please and bollox to all customers. OK, the rule isn't actually there but effictively that is what it is.
  10. No, don't ask them for evidence. If the fine is for 'driving in a bus lane' it is incorrect because it is not a bus lane. If the fine is for contravening a no-right-turn sign, then you can appeal on the lack of signs and raod markings in lady Booth Street. If the fine is for both of the above, then they have scored an own goal as those would be two separate offences.
  11. Here is one in Nottingham that is done correctly (albeit to the left rather than the right). Exactly the same, as in not a bus lane to the left but a restriction on vehicles just like in Kingston. The only real difference is this is a one way street we are in. But you will see the relevant signage and road markings.
  12. I agree. The offensive IF ANY would be not complying with a no right turn sign. There is no bus lane at all, thus the penalty is incorrect. The restriction in Eden Road at the point where you turned right is only busses, taxi's and cycles allowed'. that is not teh same as a bus lane because a bus lane (as pointed out above) must be bordered by a solid white line to the offside. As regards the no right turn sign, look at the oicture below and tell me where it says no right turn? As in my previous post, you cannot see it (ironically) because of a bus. That is why they are required in the street BEFORE you turn so you have advanced warning of them. The ground should also be marked 'TURN LEFT' I would appeal on the grounds that the alleged offence did not occur. The council will of course refuse the appeal, then go to adjudication where you will definitely win.
  • Create New...