Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wages paid into wrong account - not as simple as it sounds


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5639 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

This is my first post into what looks like a really helpful forum, it being my first post and I am asking for advice, I will try and repay the favour by helping someone with something that I have knowledge of. Perhaps in the I.T section!

 

Anyway, here is what happened to me recently. Anyone who can offer their opinion as to what they think should happen, would be really appreciated.

 

I work for a company, and get paid monthly via BACS. At this particular time, I was between bank accounts having been through a charges fiasco (got my money back though thanks) and I needed to have my wages paid into my Mum's account for just one month.

 

My Mum gave me the account number and sort code of her savings account, which is held with Abbey National, of which she read straight out of her internet banking facility. No problem, you would have thought...

 

Payday comes, the money (£2200) is nowhere to be seen. We wait 3 days to be safe and start chasing with Abbey and my company. Abbey ask what account number and sort code we gave to my company, we advise the one that is listed in our internet banking.. Here comes the problem.

 

Abbey advised us that this sort code and account number is not valid to use for bacs payments. Instead, we were supposed to give a pooling account number and reference number to receive bacs payments into this account, and the account details we gave, are that of another Abbey National customer!!

 

Abbey then went on to tell us that because the money is in someone elses account, they would not discuss it with us! After numerous calls to their CS dept and a visit to the branch, they advised my company need to apply to Abbey to get the money repaid.

 

My company have done this and the person who received the money, says they spent the money and could only afford to pay back £50 a week!

 

We have asked for their final response and are taking the matter to the financial ombudsman. What I really want is peoples opinions as to what they think the final outcome will be, i.e do you think I will get my money back?

 

Thanks for listening :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mymoneypls and welcome to CAG, I personnaly cant help but am sure someone who can will be along soon

 

 

good luck

 

skb

 

ETA: just to clarify cos im a little bit confused, you say you gave your employer your mothers account number and sort code. Abbey then say these details could not be used for BACS payments and the money ended up in someone elses account who has the same account number and sort code?? This just doesnt make sense.

so questions

 

1) were the account details your employer paid the money too the same as the ones that you gave them?

2) are the sort code and account number you gave to your employer actually those of your mother?

3) if the details given were not valis for BACS payments then how on earth was the payment made in the first place?

 

If the answer to both of the above is yes then its the fault of abbey.

If the answer to 1) is yes and 2) no then it could take some time to get the money back, with cout action if necesary

If the answer to 1) is no and 2) is yes then the fault is with your employer

If both answers are no then you better start looking for a paddle

Edited by skbuncks

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think question 3 is the pertinent one, and it sounds to me as if Abbey are full of ****.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Thanks for your responses and sorry for not being more clear in the first place.

 

1) were the account details your employer paid the money too the same as the ones that you gave them?

 

Yes.

 

2) are the sort code and account number you gave to your employer actually those of your mother?

 

They are the account number and sort code that are shown in my Mum's internet banking, but Abbey say that because it is a saving account, those details are not valid for BACS payments and if we wanted to receive a BACS payment, then we were supposed to use a holding account number and sort code, with a reference number for my Mum's account.

 

3) if the details given were not valis for BACS payments then how on earth was the payment made in the first place?

 

The payment was made, but Abbey say that the details given in internet banking are not correct for BACS payments. i.e, they are someone else's current account details. Hence the money going into some other persons account.

 

So I think, Abbey are at fault for giving misleading information inside their internet banking. Perhaps my Mum should have phoned them and asked them about BACS into savings accounts to make sure it was safe, but I think she was definitely misled.

 

My employer have been on to Abbey to retrieve the missing money, but all Abbey did was forward my employer a letter from the person who received the money, saying roughly the following:

 

"Hi, Sorry for spending the money but we thought we had won it in a competition so we spent it. We dont earn much so we will pay you back £50 a month."

 

We are raising the issue with the ombudsman, but wanted to know if anyone had any advice and also what you guys think the likely outcome will be. I have now been without the money for a few months, because Abbey are so slow to respond to letters! and have had to borrow £1500 to get by, of which I am paying a huge amount of interest.

 

Thanks again. A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So I think, Abbey are at fault for giving misleading information inside their internet banking. Perhaps my Mum should have phoned them and asked them about BACS into savings accounts to make sure it was safe, but I think she was definitely misled.

 

I agree.

 

Why should she have to ring them to ask? It is perfectly reasonable to assume that the account number and sort code listed were the ones to use.

 

However, the actions of the receiving party have been wholly inappropriate. I would be inclined to pursue that also - they are, IMO, potentially guilty of theft.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was about to say that another thread earlier on in here was about someone putting in £1000 into a bank when there was only £900... but the bank didn't check.

Now the OP was asking if they should report it or leave it and the general answer was...report it as if he/she did not... it would be a case of theft.

 

Now my thoughts are...the person who has used this money up has surely STOLE the money

It was not this person's money to spend regardless of how they got it.

 

But who is liable I have no idea

My guess...Abbey for wrong information!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I think Abbey are liable for duplicating account numbers. Some savings accounts do require a BACS payment to be made into a holding account with the savings account number as a reference however for them to issue someone else the exact same account number on a current account is frankly idiotic.

 

Spending money that wasn't supposed to be paid into your account is technically theft (and an issue very close to this site at the moment). However from my point of view (which isn't a legal one mind) Abbey are very much to blame if their systems allow multiple accounts with the same and/or similar details. Also BACS payments are supposed to check against the name the account is in I believe

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

The spending of the money is debatably theft, the key issue being if they really believed they won it in a competition. If they entered a competition with a prize of a similar amount for instance, this may be the case. Either way, they are liable to repay the money and Abbey could be liable in negligence if the receiver can't pay: for duplicating account numbers as stated above or for misleading information that led to them breaching their duty of care. It is likely that the mother would have to be the claimant in any action since it would be her the duty of care was owed to (re:Abbey at least). Also, on a non law related point, Abbey are useless, they lost my money before too. Got it back in the end but it took long enough. And then I asked for the rest of it and closed the account.

Please note nothing I say constitutes legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone, Thanks so much for your responses, its really appreciated.

 

Yes I agree with all said, and we're just gathering our case together with the FO. peterlucas, yes I agree about Abbey being useless, their attitude has been absolutely hapless and as soon as this sorry tale is dealt with my Mum is going to change.

 

I'll post here with the what happens, be it may some time next year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mymoneypls

 

Abbey, thats par for the course for them can't believe they done that to you, well i can as they done a simular thing to my dad's account.

My dad had an account for his pension, and i made it a joint account.

Short story is my dad lost his card, i wen't to the bank to cancil the card.

But what they did was remove his name from the account.

It took me 9 months before they put his name back onto the account.

I would complain and get some compansation from Abbey, they gave my dad £100 but if i knew what i know now i would of took it further.

 

Hope you get it all sorted with Abbey.

 

Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would say that the person who received the money is giving a very lame excuse about the competition.

 

If this was true then they would be able to name the company responsible for the competition as to receive the winnings straight into their account they would of had to give out their account details

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add weight to your argument, we use BACS to pay our wages and have several employees who have Abbey accounts. Before realising about the 'pool' account I paid wages to a lad who had given me the numbers off his card, and they were automatically returned by Abbey several days after they were supposed to have landed in his account, ie they tried to allocate them, couldn't, so sent them back. When you send a BACS payment, they ask for the sort code, account number and NAME ofof the account holder. Are they then saying the person they paid the money to had the same name as your mother?

 

Good grief, in this day and age you would think security wuld be tightened, not let slip like this. I've read in threads on the Employment part of here where people have been overpaid wages that there are grounds to repay them in stages.

 

FWIW I'd be going after Abbey National. See if you can get hold of the email and postal address for the CEO and write to him demanding action (plus compensation ;))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sorry to hear about your plight; it really is distressing when your salary gets messed up like this.

 

IMO Abbey aren't at fault at all. I suspect the T&C for your mothers savings account state that BACS transfers can't be made directly into the account, so I don't see how they have 'misled' you - as you haven't sought their advice at any point to enable them to mislead you.

 

I doubt very much that the people who have spent your money have entered, and been notified they won, a competition which coincided with them receiving your £2200. However, if they did then they would have received the competition winnings as well, i.e. had double the money.

 

Either way, I think you have very good reason to take them to court to recover your money; I wouldn't believe them for a second that they either entered or won a competition, and would make them prove it in the County court. If they did then great, because then they've admitted that they knew the money wasn't the competition winnings (as they would have received these additionally), and if they didn't (enter or win a competition) then great, because they're admitting they knew the money wasn't competition winnings)... Damned if they do, damned if they don't. It would also help you formalise the repayment arrangement, and may increase the repayments you receive if they can afford it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Everyone,

 

I have an update on my situation here.

 

We are still filing a complaint against Abbey for what we think is bad practise. But in the meantime, the people who received the money have written to my employer through the bank, asking if we accept the £50 per week.

 

Now I think that these people have probably looked into their position and are a bit worried that they will be prosecuted for theft.

 

Should I respond to this saying that we do not accept the offer of £50 a month and they should pay back the amount in full? Or should I ignore their letter and keep pushing the matter through the Ombudsman?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you need to get in touch with someone high up in Abbey and kick off merry hell it is inconceivable that 2 accounts, whether they be savings and current or not, should have the same account number, I would be persuing Abbey, it is their problem, have you tried Money Mail? Watchdog?

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have pursued Abbey as high as I could go, they have issued their final response letter and we are now pursuing them through the Financial Ombudsman...

 

Its just in the meantime, I was thinking of replying to the person who received the money and demand the whole amount back in hope that the threat of a legal case would scare them into just giving it back?

 

Abbey are absolutely useless.. But I do just want my money back :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wages paid into wrong account ? why doesnt ur employer pay you again and there chase the bacs payment through the bank, the company would have more chance of taking the bank on for refund than you would, if it was i that was waiting for this wages payment, i would be asking my employer for for it, as the money is due from them after all. i do'nt see how you writing to the person whom got ur money would help, and how did you find out the persons address and name ? i would have though thought this information was confidental ?

The bank should be chasing the person whom got the money not you, myself would seek my company to chase this, as infact the money was theres, it isnt urs untill its received. good luck with ur quest, and i hope u get ur money sooner rather than later...but i really do think the matter is with ur employer and the bank....

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would forget the financial ombudsman as your first line (keep the complaint going but dont rely on it for a quick response)

 

I would write to abbey telling them that unless they return the money to you, or place it in your mothers account you will take them to court, as in your opinion you believe that, having given the sort code and account number of the account you acted appropriately, and if their systems were so lax as to allow the money to be paid into another persons account then they are at fault.

 

Send the letter registered and if they do not respond - issue. (it will cost but you can add it to the bill)

 

It is upto the bank to get the money back off the person who they wrongly gave it to - not you.

 

Even if the T&C of the account your mother has says it does not accept bacs, they should have checked the name as well as the account number and the bacs should have been refused.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flyingdoc, thanks for your response, this is really helpful.

 

We will keep taking Abbey to court as our first line of action and keep the Ombudsman enquiry going as well.

 

The fact that you say if the name is wrong the payment should have been refused is comforting, since this is definitely 100% fault of the bank.

 

Thanks to everyone again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...