"Your conduct in this matter is unacceptable" Oh dear looks like Reliable are upset....shame

[HomeToRoost]

subbing... Muckraft amuse me no end:rolleyes:

[pinky1977]

me too

 

i like a good laugh

[blind-as-a-bat]

 

 

 

Well that was soooo easy, but just goes to show they dont read what you send them properly, (you need to know what i sent but trust me that reply shows they did not read it correctly, so have made themselves look even dafter )

 

Wonder what JD-W will come up with next:rolleyes:

Edited October 7, 2009 by blind-as-a-bat

[babybear39]

Well, they have moorcrap involved...It doesn't get dafter than that

[citizenB]

Well, BAB, it seems as though some progress is being made

[mr.ton]

 

 

 

Well that was soooo easy, but just goes to show they dont read what you send them properly, (you need to know what i sent but trust me that reply shows they did not read it correctly, so have made themselves look even dafter )

 

Wonder what JD-W will come up with next:rolleyes:

 

 

I love reading squirming DCA letters like that

[blind-as-a-bat]

Just thought you all may like an update on this, after admiting in writing they could not persue it through legal channels, they have employed fredricksons who, yep you have guessed it threatened legal action, followed by Brian Carter doing the same:rolleyes:

 

Now I know he will not like my reply, but i have got past careing, and hope he does waste his time and money, as for other reasons, he wont get a bean:p

 

You could say we have reached a state where heads i win, tails he loses;)

 

 

PS ooops, note to self, need to update the links in this thread

[mr.ton]

Report them all to the OFT & trading standards.

[ODC]

Just thought you all may like an update on this, after admiting in writing they could not persue it through legal channels, they have employed fredricksons who, yep you have guessed it threatened legal action, followed by Brian Carter doing the same:rolleyes:

 

Now I know he will not like my reply, but i have got past careing, and hope he does waste his time and money, as for other reasons, he wont get a bean:p

 

You could say we have reached a state where heads i win, tails he loses;)

 

 

PS ooops, note to self, need to update the links in this thread

 

If you wait 7 days good ole Bryan will have applied for Judgement by default with his pals at Northampton

[blind-as-a-bat]

If you wait 7 days good ole Bryan will have applied for Judgement by default with his pals at Northampton

 

Who cares, a bankruptcy petition will lay a CCJ to rest anyway.

 

If it was me who had to fight this i would, but there are two i cant fight, and win even so.

 

But it is not my debt, its my OH and she cannot fight it, for mental health reasons, and thanks to the joke that is the legal system, i cant do it for her as her health problems are not bad enough:rolleyes:

 

That said, i can still win, in a round about way, just hope i can string it out to cost them as much as poss first;)

[2ltr16valve]

This thread has certainly made me laugh many times, how dumb can these people be !

 

Well done for carrying on for so long, deffo report them. Even if you are going to apply for BR.

 

well done again

[F_DCAs]

Yep, report all DCAs concerned to all arbitration bodies concerned.

 

Then, as your conduct clearly is unacceptable, go and sit on the naughty step - before a collector takes it from you.

 

Reliable cracks me up - that has to be one of the most laughable lines in any DCA correspondence from any company.

[blind-as-a-bat]

Finaly got a reason to dust this of and update, and trust me, this is the iceing on the cake:rolleyes:

 

 

Well, Brian must not have fancied it, but it looks like Moorcroft have lost the plot, after sending this in March last year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I got another one of these yesterday.

 

 

 

Just when you thought they could not make themselves look any dafter, they do

[JonCris]

'Pre-Court Division' OO'er:eek: sounds serious:rolleyes:

[blind-as-a-bat]

Oh, and yes, i know where this is going, after the ruling at the end of last year, already figured that one out ;-)

[blind-as-a-bat]

'Pre-Court Division' OO'er:eek: sounds serious:rolleyes:

 

Sort of loses its menace the second time round, not that it had any the first time

[Helios]

if it is not actually read by you --- :lol: cracks us up that

 

Should of taken the hint by now there is no paperwork exists, DCAs are not the sharpest of tools

[citizenB]

 

Dear Moorcroft,

 

You were unable to collect on this account when you were acting for ABC.. what on earth makes you think you can now collect on it acting for CBA.. it is still the same account, and it is still subject to default of s78.

 

Pursuing an account when you know full well it is subject to dispute is in breach of OFT Guidelines. Oh, but you would know that wouldnt you.. because I pointed it out to you the last time... muppets.

 

Yours

 

really, really ticked off.

 

 

[babybear39]

Get a poster size piece of paper, some large crayons and have some fun

[MorganaNK]

Subbing... and thanks for the laugh, needed it today!

[FightingDirty]

So pleased to read my way through this - am just about to enter into combat with Unreliable myself!

[Guest Cartaphilus]

The more I keep seeing this thread title the more I keep thinking about what they might do or say:

 

1) Tell someone to go stand on the 'naughty step'

2) Stand in the corner

3) Straight to bed with no porridge

 

Well, you can see ... I hope.

[The GodMother]

cartaphilus you forgot to say that tandrum will only make your punishment go on longer.

[F_DCAs]

Aren't Reliable on the way out? If so, I need to find someone else to laugh at.

[welshwizard]

Aren't Reliable on the way out? If so, I need to find someone else to laugh at.

 

Really? Please tell me more - I need cheering up..... I am in the middle of 8 formal complaints with them not one has been addressed yet and their 20 days to deal with the first couple end on Friday.